Ahmad Ahmadzadeh Amiri1, Avideh Maboudi2, Adele Bahar3, Asadollah Farokhfar4, Fatemeh Daneshvar5, Hamid Reza Khoshgoeian6, Mehdi Nasohi7, Alireza Khalilian8. 1. Bu Ali-Sina Clinical Research Development Unit, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Mazandaran, Iran ; Diabetes Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Mazandaran, Iran. 2. Department of Periodontics, Dental Faculty, Diabetes Research Center, Mazandaran, Iran. 3. Diabetes Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Mazandaran, Iran. 4. Bu Ali-Sina Clinical Research Development Unit, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Mazandaran, Iran. 5. Research Committee, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Mazandaran, Iran. 6. Department of Dentistry, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Mazandaran, Iran. 7. Student Research Committee, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Mazandaran, Iran. 8. Department of Biostatistics, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Sari, Iran. E-mail: avideh48188@yahoo.com.
Dear Editor,We appreciate the comments regarding our article entitled “Relationship between type 2 diabetic retinopathy (DR) and periodontal disease in Iranian Adults” published in North American Journal of Medical Sciences 2014; 6:139-44.[1]In response to the comment, the control group, we selected healthy individuals matched to the cases as a secondary target for comparison of the oral hygiene and periodontal conditions of the diabetics versus the control group. The cases were 84 diabeticpatients with retinopathy under focus and the controls were 129 type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients without retinopathy under focus. We state that the severity of periodontal disease was significantly correlated with the severity of DR, and the risk of proliferative DR (PDR) was significantly higher in the presence of periodontal disease. This comparison occurred between two groups of diabeticpatients with or without respective to retinopathy. It could be considered that we agree some mistake occurred in the numbers of Table 1 in our article. We wish to correct it as following: