| Literature DB >> 24843790 |
Jagdish Gabhane1, Spm Prince William1, Atul Narayan Vaidya1, Duraisamy Anand1, Satish Wate1.
Abstract
The present investigation aims at studying the effectiveness of alkali-assisted ultrasonication on pretreatment of garden biomass (GB). Dry and powdered GB suspended in 1% NaOH was ultrasonicated for 15, 30 and 60 minutes at a frequency of 25 KHZ. The mode of action and effectiveness of alkali-assisted ultrasonication on GB was established through microscopic, scanning electron microscopic and X-ray diffraction studies. A perusal of results showed that alkali-assisted ultrasonication led to fibrillation of GB which ultimately facilitated enzymatic hydrolysis. The results also indicated that alkali-assisted ultrasonication is an efficient means of pretreatment of GB at moderate (45-50°C) working temperature and low (1%) concentration of alkali. The yield of reducing sugar after enzymatic hydrolysis increased almost six times as compared to control due to alkali-assisted ultrasonication.Entities:
Keywords: Alkali pretreatment; Cellulosic ethanol; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Garden biomass; Ultra structural changes; Ultrasonication
Year: 2014 PMID: 24843790 PMCID: PMC4008385 DOI: 10.1186/2052-336X-12-76
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Health Sci Eng
Composition of garden biomass expressed as % of dry matter
| 1 | Total organic matter | 85.70 |
| 2 | Organic carbon | 45.13 |
| 3 | Total nitrogen | 1.16 |
| 4 | Ash content | 12.58 |
| 5 | C/N ratio | 38.90 |
| 6 | Cellulose | 44.03 |
| 7 | Hemicellulose | 28.55 |
| 8 | Lignin | 24.46 |
| 9 | Sodium | 1.98 |
| 10 | Potassium | 1.17 |
| 11 | Phosphorous | 0.98 |
Effectiveness of alkali concentration and sonication time on reducing sugar yield after enzymatic hydrolysis
| 00, 0.0 | 5.40 ± 0.65 a | --- |
| 00, 0.5 | 26.53 ± 0.76 c | 391.29 |
| 00, 1.0 | 32.76 ± 1.92 d | 506.66 |
| 00, 5.0 | 39.26 ± 0.78 ef | 627.03 |
| 15, 0.0 | 7.64 ± 2.33 ab | 41.48 |
| 15, 0.5 | 31.05 ± 3.34 d | 475.00 |
| 15, 1.0 | 37.71 ± 1.23 e | 598.33 |
| 15, 5.0 | 41.63 ± 0.62 f | 670.92 |
| 30, 0.0 | 8.41 ± 1.49 ab | 55.74 |
| 30, 0.5 | 36.54 ± 1.94 e | 576.66 |
| 30, 1.0 | 48.13 ± 1.57 g | 791.29 |
| 30, 5.0 | 52.32 ± 0.80 h | 868.88 |
| 60, 0.0 | 9.55 ± 1.58 b | 76.85 |
| 60, 0.5 | 42.42 ± 1.68 f | 685.55 |
| 60, 1.0 | 59.56 ± 2.60 j | 1002.96 |
| 60, 5.0 | 56.40 ± 3.43 i | 944.44 |
Data are means ± SD (n=3).
Means followed by the same letter in a column are not significantly different at P ≤0.05 by DMRT.
Initial and final characterization of garden biomass after alkali- microwave and alkali-sonication pretreatments
| Cellulose | 44.03 ± 1.39 a | 66.25 ± 2.83 b | 73.08 ± 0.77 c | 77.28 ± 0.85 d |
| Hemi-Cellulose | 28.55 ± 3.19 c | 12.85 ± 0.69 b | 7.19 ± 0.32 a | 8.02 ± 0.85 a |
| Lignin | 24.46 ± 0.64 d | 19.80 ± 0.82 c | 15.86 ± 0.87 b | 13.39 ± 0.69 a |
Data are means ± SD (n=3).
Means followed by the same letter in a column are not significantly different at P ≤0.05 by DMRT.
Figure 1Light and scanning electron microscopic views of control and pretreated GB. A: Polarized light microscopic view of raw garden biomass. B: Polarized light microscopic view of alkali-microwave pretreated garden biomass showing fragmentation. C: Polarized light microscopic view of alkali-sonication pretreated garden biomass showing fibrillation. D: Scanning electron microscopic view (500 X) of untreated garden biomass. E: Scanning electron microscopic view (500 X) of garden biomass pretreated with alkali (1% NaOH)-sonication. F: Scanning electron microscopic view (500 X) of garden biomass pretreated with alkali (1% NaOH)-microwave.