| Literature DB >> 24843684 |
Lan He1, Chun Kwok Wong2, Kitty Kt Cheung1, Ho Chung Yau3, Anthony Fu3, Hai-Lu Zhao1, Karen Ml Leung2, Alice Ps Kong4, Gary Wk Wong3, Paul Ks Chan5, Gang Xu4, Juliana Cn Chan4.
Abstract
AIMS/Entities:
Keywords: Diabetes; Exendin‐4; Inflammation
Year: 2013 PMID: 24843684 PMCID: PMC4020234 DOI: 10.1111/jdi.12063
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Diabetes Investig ISSN: 2040-1116 Impact factor: 4.232
Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with type 2 diabetes and control subjects
| Variables | Type 2 diabetes | Controls |
|---|---|---|
|
| 10 | 10 |
| Sex (male/female) | 6/4 | 8/2 |
| Age (years) | 32 (27–33) | 26.5 (25–31.5) |
| Duration of disease (years) | 1 (1–2) | NA |
| Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) | 8.6 (5.9–12.1) | 4.9 (4.5–5.2) |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 28 (26.7–33.2) | 21.1 (19.3–22.6) |
| Fasting serum C‐peptide (pmol/L) | 980.2 (470.5–1561.4) | 232 (170.9–275.7) |
| Anti‐GAD | Negative | Negative |
| Anti‐IA2 | Negative | Negative |
| HOMA‐IR | 29.2 (20.1–42.6) | 7.9 (5.8–13.5) |
| HOMA‐β% | 193.8 (123.7–505.8) | 416.4 (340.7–664.6) |
| Treatment with metformin | ||
| Patients, | 8 (80%) | NA |
| Daily dose (mg) | 2100 (1700–3000) | NA |
| Treatment with simvastatin | ||
| Patients, | 3 (30%) | NA |
| Daily dose (mg) | 26.7 (20–40) | NA |
| Treatment with gliclazide | ||
| Patients, | 2 (20%) | NA |
| Daily dose (mg) | 125 (90–160) | NA |
| Treatment with lisinopril | ||
| Patients, | 2 (20%) | NA |
| Daily dose (mg) | 12.5 (12.5–12.5) | NA |
| Cytokines/chemokines | ||
| TNF‐α (pg/mL) | 56 (7–236) | 22 (8–58)* |
| IL‐1β (pg/mlL) | 111 (6–184) | 35 (22–61)* |
| IL‐6 (pg/mL) | 114 (8–205) | 55 (20–105)* |
| RANTES (pg/mL) | 330 (53–694) | 32 (15–98)* |
| CXCL10 (pg/mL) | 76 (10–156) | 24 (16–38)* |
*P < 0.05. CXL10, interferon‐γ‐induced protein 10; GAD, glutamic acid decarboxylase; HOMA‐β, homeostatic model assessment of β‐cell finction; HOMA‐IR, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; IA2, protein tyrosine phosphatase; IL, interleukin; NA, not applicable, RANTES, regulated on activation normal T‐cell expressed and secreted; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.
Figure 1Effects of exendin‐4 on the ex vivo production of pro‐inflammatory cytokines of controls (CTL) and patients with type 2 diabetes. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from controls and type 2 diabetes patients were pretreated with U0126 (U0126 10 μmol/L), SB203580 (SB 10 μmol/L) for 1 h followed by incubation with or without exendin‐4 (Ex4; 50 nmol/L) for 24 h. Release of (a) tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α, (b) interleukin (IL)‐1β and (c) IL‐6 were determined by cytometric bead array using flow cytometry. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (0.1%) was used as the vehicle control. Results are presented with box‐and‐whisker plots. *P < 0.05.
Figure 2(a) CCL5/regulated on activation normal T‐cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) and (b) CXCL10/interferon‐γ‐induced protein 10 (IP‐10) levels in culture supernatants of peripheral blood mononuclear cell from patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and normal controls (CTL) with or without treatment of exendin‐4 (50 nmol/L) for 24 h at 37°C. Results are presented with box‐and‐whisker plots. *P < 0.05.
Figure 3Representative histograms of flow cytometry analysis of phospho‐mitogen‐activated protein kinases including (a) phospho‐extracellular signal‐regulated kinase (ERK), (b) phospho‐p38, and (c) phospho‐c‐Jun NH2‐terminal protein kinase (JNK) in CD4+ T lymphocytes and monocytes from peripheral blood mononuclear cells in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and the control group (CTL). Triplicate experiments were carried out with essentially identical results and representative figures are shown. Immunoglobulin G1 isotypic control antibodies, which have no specificity for target cells within a particular experiment yet retain all the non‐specific characteristics of the antibodies used in the experiment. Inclusion of this antibody is to confirm the specificity of primary antibody binding and exclude non‐specific fragment crystallizable receptor binding to cells or other cellular protein interactions.
Figure 4Basal and ex vivo expression of phospho‐mitogen‐activated protein kinases (MAPK) in exendin‐4 treated CD4+ T lymphocytes and monocytes from peripheral blood mononuclear cells in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and healthy subjects. (4‐1) Representative histograms show the intracellular expression of (a,b) phospho‐extracellular signal‐regulated kinase (ERK), (c,d) phosphor‐p38 and (e,f) phosphor‐c‐Jun NH2‐terminal protein kinase (JNK) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells incubated without or with exendin‐4 (50 nmol/L) for 10 min. (4‐2) Results are expressed in bar charts. (a) Phosphorylation of ERK, (b), phosphorylation of p38 MAPK and (c) phosphorylation of JNK in monocytes and CD4+ T lymphocytes from patients with type2 diabetes and control subjects were analyzed by flow cytometry. Results are presented with box‐and‐whisker plots.
Figure 5Effect of exendin‐4 on the ex vivo production of superoxide anion in culture supernatant of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from type 2 diabetes patients and control subjects. PBMC culture was incubated with or without exendin‐4 at 50 nmol/L for 24 h, with or without pretreatment with U0126 (U0126 10 μmol/L), SP600125 (SP 10 μmol/K) and SB203580 (SB 10 μmol/L) for 1 h. Culture supernatants were then harvested for the assay of superoxides. Results are presented with box‐and‐whisker plots. *P < 0.05. CTL, control; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; T2DM, type 2 diabetes.