| Literature DB >> 24843665 |
Tomoyuki Takagi1, Hiroto Furuta1, Masakazu Miyawaki2, Kazuaki Nagashima3, Takeshi Shimada1, Asako Doi1, Shohei Matsuno1, Daisuke Tanaka3, Masahiro Nishi1, Hideyuki Sasaki1, Nobuya Inagaki3, Norishige Yoshikawa2, Kishio Nanjo4, Takashi Akamizu1.
Abstract
AIMS/Entities:
Keywords: ABCC8; Neonatal diabetes; Sulfonylurea receptor
Year: 2013 PMID: 24843665 PMCID: PMC4015663 DOI: 10.1111/jdi.12049
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Diabetes Investig ISSN: 2040-1116 Impact factor: 4.232
Figure 1Pedigree of the family. The allele status is indicated under the symbols. Directly below the genotype is the age of diagnosis of diabetes and treatment. INS, insulin; NA, not available for testing; NM, one normal and one mutated allele; NN, two normal alleles; OHA, oral hypoglycemic agent.
Figure 2(a) Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) sensitivity of wild‐type and mutant ATP‐sensitive potassium (KATP) channels. The dose‐dependent inhibitory effects of ATP on the activities of the wild‐type (Kir6.2/SUR1) and mutant (Kir6.2/SUR1P1198L) KATP channels are shown. Five experiments were carried out for each type of channel. The channel conductance of the mutant channel in a ATP‐free condition was similar to that of the wild‐type channel (73.1 ± 0.57 vs 72.9 ± 0.52 pico‐siemens (pS), P = 0.765). (b) Sulfonylurea sensitivity of the wild‐type (Kir6.2/SUR1) or the mutant (Kir6.2/SUR1P1198L) KATP channels. Residual KATP channel activities were determined by the ratio between the amplitudes of KATP channel currents before and after 100 μmol/L tolbutamide (Tolb) or 30 nmol/L glibenclamide (Glib) applications. Data are mean ± standard error from seven independent experiments. IC50, the concentration of adenosine triphosphate at which the inhibition is half of the maximal.
Figure 3(a) Daily urinary sugar excretion and daily urinary C‐peptide excretion at insulin injection, high‐dose gliclazide (a daily dose of 160 mg) or low‐dose glibenclamide (a daily dose of 0.625 mg, which is 0.017 mg/kg/day) administration in the patient. (b) Schematic representation of the sulfonylurea receptor and the location of P1198L mutation (arrowed) identified in the patient. CL, cytosolic loop; NBD, nucleotide‐binding domain; TMD, transmembrane domain.