| Literature DB >> 24843496 |
Nobuhisa Nakamura1, Keiko Naruse2, Yasuko Kobayashi3, Takashi Matsuki4, Yoji Hamada5, Eitaro Nakashima6, Hideki Kamiya7, Masaki Hata3, Toru Nishikawa3, Atsushi Enomoto1, Masahide Takahashi1, Toyoaki Murohara8, Tatsuaki Matsubara3, Yutaka Oiso4, Jiro Nakamura4.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Aims/Introduction: Endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) play a critical role in adult vasculogenesis and vascular repair. Previous studies have described the dysfunction of EPC in diabetic patients, but the precise mechanism is still unclear. To elucidate the dysfunction of EPC in diabetic patients, we investigated the functions and intracellular signaling of EPC under normal or high glucose conditions. We also examined the number of EPC in the peripheral blood of Japanese type 2 diabetic patients.Entities:
Keywords: Akt; Endothelial progenitor cells; Vascular endothelial growth factor
Year: 2011 PMID: 24843496 PMCID: PMC4014965 DOI: 10.1111/j.2040-1124.2010.00093.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Diabetes Investig ISSN: 2040-1116 Impact factor: 4.232
Figure 1Identification of cultured endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) from cord blood. Flow cytometric analysis showed positive stainings with CD34, CD31, KDR and Tie‐2.
Figure 2The number of endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) cultured under the normal glucose (NG) or high glucose (HG) condition. After expansion of EPC for 7 days, 2 × 104 cells of EPC were seeded in each six‐well plate and cultured with Medium 199 containing 5.5 mmol/L glucose (NG) or 20 mmol/L glucose (HG) for 72 h. Attached cells on the well were counted. Results are shown as the mean ± SE (n = 3). *P < 0.05 vs normal glucose control.
Figure 3DNA synthesis was measured by a Cell Proliferation BrdU ELISA assay. Cells were incubated with Medium 199 containing 5.5 mmol/L glucose (NG), 20 mmol/L glucose (HG) or 5.5 mmol/L glucose + 14.5 mmol/L l‐glucose as an osmotic control (l‐glu). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was added 24 h before the BrdU assay. PI 3‐kinase inhibitor, LY294002, was pretreated 30 min before VEGF stimulation. Results are shown as the mean ± SE (n = 6). *P < 0.01, **P < 0.05 vs normal glucose control.
Figure 4Detection of apoptosis in endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) cultured under the normal or high glucose condition. (a) The apoptotic cells (allows indicate) under 5.5 mmol/L glucose (NG) and 20 mmol/L glucose (HG) conditions were visualized with the staining of the cells with Hoechst 33342. (b) The adherent EPC were maintained in serum starved‐Medium 199 containing NG or HG with or without 25 ng/mL of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for 72 h. LY294002 was pretreated before VEGF stimulation. Apoptotic cells were detected by staining with Hoechst 33342. Numbers of apoptotic EPC are the mean ± SE percentage of total cells. *P < 0.01, **P < 0.05 vs normal glucose control.
Figure 5The phosphorylation of Akt under the normal glucose (NG) or high glucose (HG) condition. Confluent‐grown endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) in six‐well multiplates were cultured with Medium 199 containing 5.5 mmol/L glucose (NG) or 20 mmol/L glucose (HG) for 72 h. Phosphorylation of Akt was identified by western blot using anti‐phosphospecific Akt antibody. Results are shown as the mean ± SE (n = 3), *P < 0.05.
Figure 6The phosphorylation of Akt stimulated by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) under the normal glucose (NG) or high glucose (HG) condition. Confluently‐grown endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) in six‐well multiplates were cultured with Medium 199 containing 5.5 mmol/L glucose (NG) or 20 mmol/L glucose (HG) for 72 h. After starvation with 0.5% fetal bovine serum for 24 h, EPC were cultured with VEGF (25 ng/mL) for the indicated time. One of three experiments with similar results is shown. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs 0 min control in each group.
Figure 7Quantification of endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) by flow cytometry. Circulating EPC were identified by flow cytometry with low cytoplasmic granularity and with the expression of cell surface antigens, such as CD45lowCD34+. Representative flow cytometry analysis is shown.
Baseline clinical characteristics of non‐diabetic and type 2 diabetes subjects
| Non‐diabetic | Type 2 diabetes |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 54.5 ± 1.4 | 56.1 ± 1.4 | 0.426 |
| Male/female | 25/29 | 27/21 | 0.441 |
| Bodyweight (kg) | 58.5 ± 1.2 | 66.2 ± 2.1 | 0.002* |
| Body mass index | 22.5 ± 0.3 | 25.2 ± 0.7 | 0.001* |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 124.8 ± 2.4 | 132.1 ± 3.0 | 0.063 |
| Diastolic pressure (mmHg) | 75.7 ± 1.4 | 75.7 ± 1.3 | 0.983 |
| Fasting blood glucose (mg/dL) | 91.8 ± 1.5 | 147.7 ± 8.1 | <0.001* |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.4 ± 0.0 | 7.4 ± 0.2 | <0.001* |
| VEGF (pg/mL) | 240.0 ± 31.0 | 229.0 ± 21.3 | 0.787 |
VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor. *P < 0.05.
Figure 8Quantification of circulating CD34+CD45low progenitor cells. CD34+CD45low progenitor cells were counted by surface markers using flow cytometry analysis in age‐matched non‐diabetic subjects (non‐DM) and type 2 diabetic patients (type 2 DM). CD34+CD45low progenitor cells were quantified and expressed as number of cells per 106 total events or number of cells per milliliter of blood. *P < 0.05 vs non‐DM.
Correlation of clinical data with the number of CD34+CD45low progenitor cells
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
| Bodyweight (kg) | −0.028 | 0.749 |
| Body mass index | 0.009 | 0.918 |
| Fasting blood glucose (mg/dL) | −0.146 | 0.114 |
| HbA1c (%) | −0.265 | 0.004 |
| Insulin (IU/mL) | 0.243 | 0.068 |