Literature DB >> 24843255

Petrocephalus boboto and Petrocephalus arnegardi, two new species of African electric fish (Osteoglossomorpha, Mormyridae) from the Congo River basin.

Sébastien Lavoué1, John P Sullivan2.   

Abstract

A specimen of the African weakly electric fish genus Petrocephalus (Osteoglossomorpha, Mormyridae) collected in the Congo River at Yangambi, Orientale Province, Democratic Republic of Congo, is described as a new species. Petrocephalus boboto sp. n. can be distinguished from other Central African species of Petrocephalus by a combination of the following characteristics: three distinct black spots on the body, one at the origin of the pectoral fin, one at the origin of the caudal fin and one below the anterior base of the dorsal fin; Nakenrosette and Khelrosette electroreceptor clusters distinct on head but Augenrosette cluster reduced in size; 23 branched dorsal rays, 34 branched anal rays, and electric organ discharge waveform triphasic. Petrocephalus boboto sp. n. most closely resembles the holotype of Petrocephalus binotatus but is easily distinguished from it by its smaller mouth. A comparative molecular analysis including 21 other Petrocephalus species shows Petrocephalus boboto sp. n. to be genetically distinctive and to represent a deep lineage in the genus. Two specimens of Petrocephalus collected at Yangambi are morphologically similar and genetically closely related to specimens previously assigned to Petrocephalus binotatus, collected in the northwestern Congo River basin within Odzala-Kokua National Park, Republic of the Congo. This prompts us to formally describe a new species from these collections, Petrocephalus arnegardi sp. n., that, although similar to the holotype of Petrocephalus binotatus, can be distinguished from it by its smaller mouth and shorter interorbital width.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biodiversity; Petrocephalinae; cytochrome b; electric organ discharge; integrative taxonomy; phylogeny; weakly electric fish

Year:  2014        PMID: 24843255      PMCID: PMC4023242          DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.400.6743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zookeys        ISSN: 1313-2970            Impact factor:   1.546


Introduction

The monophyletic African weakly electric fishes superfamily Mormyroidea (Teleostei, Osteoglossomorpha) contains two families, the Gymnarchidae and Mormyridae, and 212 species (Eschmeyer and Fong 2014). All mormyroids generate and sense weak electric discharges for the purpose of intraspecific electrocommunication and spatial electrolocation using complex electrogenic and electroreceptive organ systems (Moller 1995, Turner et al. 1999, Bullock et al. 2005). While mormyroids are immediately identifiable by their distinctive appearance, considerable morphological, electrophysiological and behavioral diversity has evolved within the group (Arnegard et al. 2010b, Carlson et al. 2011, Rabosky et al. 2013). These differences lead to the recognition of three main lineages: the monotypic Gymnarchidae and the two reciprocally monophyletic mormyrid subfamilies Mormyrinae and Petrocephalinae with 168 and 43 valid species, respectively (Taverne 1972, Sullivan et al. 2000, Eschmeyer and Fong 2014). Recent comparative studies have revealed significant electrophysiological differences between Mormyrinae and Petrocephalinae (Lavoué et al. 2008, Carlson and Arnegard 2011, Carlson et al. 2011). In particular, Carlson et al. (2011) suggested that differences among lineages in central and peripheral electrosensory anatomies are correlated with higher electric organ discharge (EOD) waveform diversity and greater species richness in Mormyrinae relative to the Petrocephalinae. While Mormyrinae are clearly more speciose than Petrocephalinae, true species diversity is clearly underestimated in both groups. Despite often subtle morphological differentiation among PageBreakspecies of , the sole petrocephalin genus, the pace of new species discovery and description has been rapid in recent years, with about one third of diversity having been described in the 21th century (Lavoué et al. 2004, 2010, Lavoué 2011, 2012, Kramer et al. 2012). currently includes 43 valid species (Eschmeyer and Fong 2014), not including (for justification, see Daget 2000), which are widely distributed in tropical and subtropical African freshwaters. They are small fishes predominantly found in riverine systems where they are mostly active at dusk. Several morphological synapomorphies support the monophyly of (Taverne 1969, Taverne 1972), as do molecular data (Sullivan et al. 2000). Central African are particularly diverse and abundant throughout the large Congo basin with 18 species (Lavoué et al. 2010, Lavoué 2012). Here, we first describe a new species of from the main channel of the Congo River at Yangambi, Central Congo basin. Based on our long-term work on , we believe this new species is rare, as we have identified only one specimen after examination of hundreds of Central African specimens. From the same locality, we examined two specimens of that share more similarities to the specimens earlier identified as from Odzala-Kokua (Lavoué et al. 2010) than to the holotype of , despite the greater proximity of Yangambi to the type locality of (Ikengo), than to Odzala-Kokua (Fig. 1). This led us to reevaluate this identification and describe the Odzala-Kokua and Yangambi specimens as new.
Figure 1.

Hydrographic system of the Congo River basin and the type localities of sp. n. (black-filled star) at Yangambi, Democratic Republic of Congo, sp. n. (gray-filled star) at Odzala-Kokua National Park, Republic of the Congo and (white-filled star) at Ikengo, near Mbandaka, Democratic Republic of Congo.

Hydrographic system of the Congo River basin and the type localities of sp. n. (black-filled star) at Yangambi, Democratic Republic of Congo, sp. n. (gray-filled star) at Odzala-Kokua National Park, Republic of the Congo and (white-filled star) at Ikengo, near Mbandaka, Democratic Republic of Congo.

Materials and methods

specimens newly examined in this study were collected in September 2010 from the Congo River at Yangambi, Orientale Province, Democratic Republic of Congo (Fig. 1). Comparative material including type specimens from all valid species from the Congo River basin and the Lower Guinea province is listed in Lavoué et al. (2004, 2010) and Lavoué (2012). About half of the nucleotidic sequences of the cytochrome b gene (about 600 base pairs from the 3’ end) were determined for three specimens of collected at Yangambi. In the field, we recorded EODs from two of these three specimens of . Each individual was first transferred to a plastic tank (ca. 80 cm long*30 cm wide*30 cm deep) filled with water from the capture location. EODs were recorded with silver/silver-chloride electrodes connected to an Edirol FA-66 analog-to-digital Firewire audio interface (Roland Corporation). Signals were visualized and stored in SignalScope 2.0 virtual oscilloscope software (Faber Acoustical) such that positivity at the fish’s head was always recorded in the upward direction. Water temperature of each recording was noted. Fish were euthanized with an overdose of MS222, photographed, tissued, tagged with a unique specimen number, fixed in buffered 10% formalin and later transferred to 70% ethanol. Total peak-to-peak amplitudes of all EODs were normalized to a value of one. We did not correct the time base of EODs to a uniform temperature as this procedure proPageBreakduces only minimal changes. Seven EOD measures were taken as described in Lavoué et al. (2008): relative height of peak 1, relative height of peak 2, relative height of peak 3 (when present), duration of peak 1, duration of peak 2, duration of peak 3 (when present), total EOD duration. EOD recordings have been archived in the Macaulay Library at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology (CUML accession numbers provided in Suppl. material 1). Mature male specimens were identified by the presence of an anal fin notch (Pezzanite and Moller 1998). Methods for making counts and measurements and their PageBreakabbreviations follow those given by Boden et al. (1997), except for body height and standard length that are modified as in Lavoué et al. (2004). Furthermore, the snout length and the mouth position are the nearest distances, parallel to the body axis, from the perpendicular line through the tip of the snout to the anterior border of the eye and the corner of the mouth, respectively. We examined the specimens for the presence of each of the three distinct clusters of Knollenorgan-type electroreceptors on the head of , as described in Harder (1968, 2000). The “Augenrosettes” are directly above the anterior half of the eye, the “Nackenrosettes” are dorsally situated on each side of the nape, slightly anterior to the opercular openings and the “Kehlrosettes” are situated anterior to and extending somewhat below the insertion of the pectoral fins. DNA was extracted from fin clips preserved in 90% ethanol. PCR amplification and sequencing of the partial cytochrome b gene were as described by Sullivan et al. (2000) using the following -specific primers: L15213_MOR (5’-CTA ACC CGA TTC TTT GCC TTC CAC TTC CT-3’) and H15913_MOR (5’-TCG ATC TCC GGA TTA CAA GAC CG-3’). Cytochrome b sequences generated in this study are available in GenBank under accession numbers KF181719 to KF181721. The three new partial cytochrome b sequences were added to the dataset published in Lavoué (2012) from which individuals uninformative for interspecific comparisons have been removed. Following the conclusions of Kramer et al. (2012) who resurrected several species previously synonymized with , we assigned revised names to two specimens (and their corresponding cytochrome b sequences) treated in Lavoué (2012): one specimen of from the Rufiji River is renamed and one specimen of from the Wami River is renamed . The alignment does not require any indels and missing data were coded with “-”. The final alignment comprises 1140 nucleotidic positions. The maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was calculated under the general time reversible model of nucleotide substitution with rate heterogeneity following a discrete gamma distribution (GTR+Г), using the software RAxML-VI-HPC (Stamatakis 2006) and its graphical interface raxmlGUI (Silvestro and Michalak 2012).

Taxonomy

sp. n.

http://zoobank.org/A0EE9192-B7D4-4565-A598-E251D86AD5D4 http://species-id.net/wiki/Petrocephalus_boboto Figs 2 and 3 ; Table 1
Figure 2.

A EOD waveform of the holotype of sp. n. from Yangambi (CUMV 96774) B EOD waveform of the specimen JPS-511 of from Yangambi (BMNH 2013.8.29.125). Waveform plotted with head-positivity upwards.

Figure 3.

Photographs of the holotype of sp. n. from Yangambi, Congo River, Democratic Republic of Congo. Top photograph, the holotype specimen (56.9 mm standard length) before preservation showing appearance in life (CUMV 96774); middle and bottom photographs represent the left and right sides of the preserved holotype. Scale bar equals one centimeter.

Table 1.

Principal morphometric ratios and meristic counts for the holotype (CUMV 96774) of sp. n. from Yangambi, the holotype (MRAC 15191) of from Ikengo, the holotype (CUMV 88074) and the 17 paratypes (CUMV 88076, 88079, 88041, 87838, 88063, 87785, 88052, 88053, 92390, 87830, 88080, 88123, 88064, 88065, 88031 and 88032) of sp. n., all from Odzala-Kokua National Park, and two other specimens (BMNH 2013.8.29.34 and 2013.8.29.125) of sp. n. from Yangambi. Abbreviations: u = sex undetermined; m = sexually mature male; Min-Max = minimum-maximum; stdev = standard deviation. “*” indicates data from Pellegrin (1924).

Petrocephalus boboto sp. n.Petrocephalus binotatusPetrocephalus arnegardi sp. n.
Holotype (u) from YangambiHolotype (m) from IkengoHolotype (m) from OdzalaParatypes from OdzalaTwo non-types (u, m) from Yangambi
Min–MaxMean (stdev)
Standard length (mm)56.983.272.662.8–90.172.148.9, 76.0
Head length (mm)17.423.121.617.3–24.620.312.3, 20.2
Ratio of standard length (SL):
SL/body height (H)2.72.42.52.3–2.82.6 (0.2)2.8, 2.6
SL/head length (HL)3.33.63.43.4–3.93.6 (0.2)4.0, 3.8
SL/pre-dorsal distance (PDD)1.61.61.51.4–1.61.5 (0.0)1.6, 1.6
SL/pre-anal distance (PAD)1.81.71.61.6–1.71.7 (0.0)1.8, 1.7
SL/dorsal fin length (DFL)5.14.54.94.2–5.45.0 (0.3)5.0, 4.9
SL/anal fin length (AFL)3.02.83.12.8–3.33.0 (0.2)3.2, 3.1
SL/caudal peduncle length (CPL)6.37.06.45.7–7.56.7 (0.5)5.8, 7.6
SL/mouth width (MW)14.211.615.114.7–18.416.4 (1.1)18.0, 15.8
Ratio of head length (HL):
HL/snout length (SNL)6.65.58.36.5–9.37.5 (0.8)5.1, 5.8
HL/mouth width (MW)4.43.24.54.1–5.04.6 (0.2)4.5, 4.2
HL/eye diameter (ED)4.43.64.13.5–4.44.0 (0.3)4.2, 4.7
HL/interorbital width (IOW)3.72.33.32.6–3.93.2 (0.3)2.9, 2.6
HL/head width (HW)2.41.92.21.8–2.22.1 (0.1)1.9, 1.9
HL/mouth position (MP)4.43.95.54.2–5.64.8 (0.4)4.4, 4.4
Ratio of caudal peduncle length (CPL):
CPL/caudal peduncle depth (CPD)1.62.32.21.8–2.52.2 (0.2)2.6, 2.0
Meristic counts:
Dorsal fin branched rays (DR)23242020–2221 (1)20, 22
Anal fin branched rays (AR)34333231–3432 (1)30, 32
Number of lateral line scales (SLL)34373734–3836 (1)36, 36
Number of scale rows between anterior base of anal fin and lateral line (SDL)10111210–1311 (1)10, 10
Number of teeth in upper jaw (TUJ)1315*89–1610 (1)9, 11
Number of teeth in lower jaw (TLJ)2424*2020–2421 (1)25, 21

Holotype.

CUMV 96774, tag no. JPS-10-426, 56.9 mm SL, sex undetermined, Orientale Province, Democratic Republic of Congo: Congo River at Yangambi, 0.76°N, 24.24°E, Lavoué et al., 10 September 2010.

Diagnosis.

sp. n. is distinguished from all other species of Central Africa (i.e., Lower Guinea and Congo provinces) by the following combination of characteristics: three distinctive bilateral black spots on body, one at origin of the pectoral fin, one at origin of caudal fin and one on flank just below anterior part of dorsal fin; two distinct electoreceptive rosettes in head (i.e., Nakenrosette and Khelrosette), the third rosette (Augenrosette) reduced in size to few knollenorgan pores; 23 branched rays in dorsal fin and 34 branched rays in anal fin; triphasic EOD waveform of normal polarity (i.e. first phase head-positive).

Description.

Morphometric ratios and meristic data for holotype presented in Table 1. Standard length = 56.9 mm. Sex undetermined: specimen lacks anal fin “notch” present in mature males, but may be juvenile. Body ovoid, 2.7 times longer than high and laterally compressed. Head length 3.3 times in standard length. Snout short (HL/SNL = 6.6) and round. Mouth small (HL/MW = 4.4), subterminal, opening under anterior half of eye. Teeth small and bicuspid, 13 in single row in upper jaw, 24 in single row in lower jaw. Nostrils closely set (distance between nostrils = 0.4 mm) with the posterior one very close to eye (distance between posterior nostril and eye = 0.1 mm). Dorsal and anal fins originating in posterior half of body (SL/PDD = 1.6 and SL/PAD = 1.8). Pre-dorsal distance slightly greater than pre-anal distance (PDD/PAD = 1.1). Dorsal fin with 23 branched rays. Anal fin with 34 branched rays. Pectoral fins with 9 rays. Pelvic fin with 6 rays. Distance between pelvic fin and anal fin = 10.1 mm. Distance between pectoral fin and anal fin = 16.4 mm. Scales cover body, except for head. Lateral line visible and complete with 34 pored scales along its length. Ten scales around caudal peduncle. Ten scales between anterior base of anal fin and lateral line. Caudal peduncle narrow (CPL/CPD = 1.6). Thick skin on head. Knollenorgans visible, clustered into two distinct rosettes, Nackenrosette and Kehlrosettes as described in Harder (1968). Knollenorgan pores in front of eye not highly condensed in the form of a discernable Augenrosette. Principal morphometric ratios and meristic counts for the holotype (CUMV 96774) of sp. n. from Yangambi, the holotype (MRAC 15191) of from Ikengo, the holotype (CUMV 88074) and the 17 paratypes (CUMV 88076, 88079, 88041, 87838, 88063, 87785, 88052, 88053, 92390, 87830, 88080, 88123, 88064, 88065, 88031 and 88032) of sp. n., all from Odzala-Kokua National Park, and two other specimens (BMNH 2013.8.29.34 and 2013.8.29.125) of sp. n. from Yangambi. Abbreviations: u = sex undetermined; m = sexually mature male; Min-Max = minimum-maximum; stdev = standard deviation. “*” indicates data from Pellegrin (1924). Electric organ discharge (Fig. 2A). Short triphasic EOD waveform, first phase head-positive. Relative height of peak 1 = 0.241, relative height of peak 2 = -0.759, relative height of peak 3 = 0.053, duration of peak 1 = 0.137 msec, duration of peak 2 = 0.041 msec, duration of peak 3 = 0.079 msec, total EOD duration = 0.257 msec. Based on characteristics of the EOD, the electrocytes are assumed to have non-penetrating stalks and to be innervated posteriorly (Sullivan et al. 2000). A EOD waveform of the holotype of sp. n. from Yangambi (CUMV 96774) B EOD waveform of the specimen JPS-511 of from Yangambi (BMNH 2013.8.29.125). Waveform plotted with head-positivity upwards. Live coloration (Fig. 3). Body background color uniformly gray/silver with metallic reflection on the flanks and head. Light melanophores densely and evenly distributed on body, slightly larger on head. Three distinct black marks on each side of the body, one at the base of the pectoral fins, one at the base of the caudal fin and one subdorsal, below the first anterior rays of the dorsal fin. All fins hyaline. Photographs of the holotype of sp. n. from Yangambi, Congo River, Democratic Republic of Congo. Top photograph, the holotype specimen (56.9 mm standard length) before preservation showing appearance in life (CUMV 96774); middle and bottom photographs represent the left and right sides of the preserved holotype. Scale bar equals one centimeter. Preserved coloration (Fig. 3). Background beige with dorsum slightly darker. Numerous light melanophores visible all over body. Thick skin on head and fins opaque. Three distinct melanin marks on side of body distinctly visible.

Distribution

(Fig. 1). Holotype (and only specimen known) of sp. n. collected from the main channel of the Congo River, at Yangambi, Orientale Province, Democratic Republic of Congo.

Phylogenetic affinities

(Fig. 4). sp. n. represents a deep lineage within the genus not closely related to any of the four described species exhibiting a similar pattern of markings: , , and sp. n. However, it is worth noting that , the fifth species with a potentially similar pigmentation, is not included in this tree and the phylogenetic position of this species is unresolved.
Figure 4.

Phylogeny of (23 species, 52 specimens) estimated by maximum likelihood analysis of cytochrome b nucleotide sequences. Mormyrin , and were used as outgroups to root the tree. Numbers at internal branches are bootstrap proportions (in %) shown only for interspecific relationships and when they exceed 50%. Black-filled vertical bars to the right of the tree indicate the river basin origins of the specimens. The scale bar corresponds to 0.04 substitutions per site. sp. n. and sp. n. are highlighted in gray.

Phylogeny of (23 species, 52 specimens) estimated by maximum likelihood analysis of cytochrome b nucleotide sequences. Mormyrin , and were used as outgroups to root the tree. Numbers at internal branches are bootstrap proportions (in %) shown only for interspecific relationships and when they exceed 50%. Black-filled vertical bars to the right of the tree indicate the river basin origins of the specimens. The scale bar corresponds to 0.04 substitutions per site. sp. n. and sp. n. are highlighted in gray.

Etymology.

The name boboto is a word in Lingala, the language spoken at the type locality of sp. n., meaning “peace,” alluding to the right of all people of D.R. Congo to live in peace and safety.

Comparison.

The distinctive pattern of melanin markings of PageBreakPageBreakPageBreakPageBreakPageBreak sp. n., having three dark spots—one at the origin of the pectoral fin, a second at the origin of the caudal fin, and a third on the flank just below the anterior base of the dorsal fin—distinguishes this species from most of its congeners. Only five other species of similarly possess three black marks in these locations: , , , and sp. n. (the comparison with sp. n. is provided under the description of this species). sp. n. can immediately be distinguished from by the presence of two of the three electroreceptor rosettes on the head that are typical to (versus absence of all three in ) and a higher number of anal fin rays (33 in sp. n. versus a maximum of 28 in ). sp. n. can be distinguished from and by its higher number of anal fin rays (33 in sp. n. versus a maximum of 27 and 20 in and , respectively). also has a proportionally larger mouth (HL/MW = 2.7–3.9, mean = 3.3 versus 4.4 in sp. n.). has a proportionally wider head (HL/IOW = 2.5–3.0, mean = 2.8 and HL/HW = 1.7–1.8, mean = 1.7 versus 3.7 and 2.7 in sp. n., respectively) and its body background color is more pinkish rather than gray/silver in sp. n. sp. n. is distinguished from the holotype of by a smaller mouth (SL/MW = 14.2 and HL/MW = 4.4 versus 11.6 and 3.2, respectively, in the holotype of ), a smaller eye (HL/ED = 4.4 versus 3.6 in the holotype of ), and a smaller interorbital distance (HL/IOW = 3.7 versus 2.3 in the holotype of ). The holotype of sp. n. is smaller than the holotype of . The differences between sp. n. and are unlikely to be the result of growth allometry since allometric differences have only been observed with respect to the number of teeth in some species of (Bigorne and Paugy 1991), a character that does not differentiate these two species. Although we are confident of the specific distinction between sp. n. and , more specimens are needed to better characterize the morphological, molecular and electrophysiological differences between them. http://zoobank.org/23BDE2CA-426C-469F-B124-07E73C22EE82 http://species-id.net/wiki/Petrocephalus_arnegardi Figs 2 and 5 ; Table 1
Figure 5.

Photographs of type specimens of sp. n. from Odzala-Kokua National Park, Congo River, Republic of the Congo. Top photograph, a paratype specimen (CUMV 92390, 72.0 mm standard length) before preservation showing appearance in life; middle and bottom photographs represent the left and right sides of the preserved holotype (CUMV 88074, 71.6 mm standard length). Scale bar equals one centimeter.

Petrocephalus sp. 1, OTU 1 in Petrocephalus binotatus in CUMV 88074, tag no. 5074, 72.6 mm SL, male, Republic of the Congo: Cuvette Ouest, Congo River basin, Pandaka River, Odzala-Kokua National Park, 0.62°N, 14.92°E, Friel et al., August 2002.

Paratypes

(17). Republic of the Congo: Cuvette-Ouest: Congo River basin: CUMV 88076, tag no. 5076, 69.6 mm SL, male, same data as holotype; CUMV 88041, tag no. 5120, 85.1 mm SL, sex undetermined, same data as holotype; CUMV 88080, tag no. 5083, 72.0 mm SL, male, same data as holotype; CUMV 88032, tag no. 5101, 73.0 mm SL, male, same data as holotype; CUMV 87785, tag no. 5097, 71.3 mm SL, sex undetermined, same data as holotype; CUMV 88031, tag no. 5100, 73.7 mm SL, sex undetermined, same data as holotype; CUMV 88079, tag no. 5082, 74.8 mm SL, sex undetermined, Lékénie River at Mboko landing, Odzala-Kokua National Park, 0.62°N, 14.90°E, Friel et al., August 2002; CUMV 88063, tag no. 5197, 64.9 mm SL, sex undetermined, Lékénie River at Mboko landing, Odzala-PageBreakKokua National Park, 0.62°N, 14.90°E, Friel et al., August 2002; CUMV 88065, tag no. 5002, 70.7 mm SL, sex undetermined [cytochrome b gene determined], Lékénie River at Mboko landing, Odzala-Kokua National Park, 0.62°N, 14.90°E, Friel et al., August 2002; CUMV 88064, tag no. 5001, 63.9 mm SL, male [cytochrome b gene determined], Lékénie River at Mboko landing, Odzala-Kokua National Park, 0.62°N, 14.90°E, Friel et al., August 2002; CUMV 88052, tag no. 5158, 75.1 mm SL, male, Lékénie River at Mboko landing, Odzala-Kokua National Park, 0.62°N, 14.90°E, Friel et al., August 2002; CUMV 88053, tag no. 5159, 69.3 mm SL, male, Lékénie River at Mboko landing, Odzala-Kokua National Park, 0.62°N, 14.90°E, Friel et al., August 2002; CUMV 88123, tag no. 5377, 68.9 mm SL, male, Lékoli River, Odzala-Kokua National Park, 0.61°N, 14.93°E, Friel et al., August 2002; CUMV 87838, tag no. 5404, 90.1 mm SL, male, Lokoué River, Odzala-Kokua National Park, 0.90°N, 15.12°E, Friel et al., August 2002; CUMV 87830, tag no. 5395, 72.3 mm SL, sex undetermined, Lokoué River, Odzala-Kokua National Park, 0.90°N, 15.12°E, Friel et al., August 2002; CUMV 92390, two specimens, tag no. 6133, 62.8 mm SL, male [cytochrome b gene determined] and tag no. 6134, 67.5 mm SL, male [cytochrome b gene determined], mouth of the Lékéni River near the Lékoli River, Odzala-Kokua National Park, 0.62°N, 14.91°E, Arnegard et al., June 2006.

Other specimens

(18). Republic of the Congo: Cuvette-Ouest: Congo River basin: Lékénie River at Mboko landing, Odzala-Kokua National Park, 0.62°N, 14.90°E, Friel et al., August 2002: CUMV 88066, tag no. 5028, 59.0 mm SL, sex undetermined; CUMV 88046, tag no. 5126, SL not measured, sex undetermined; Republic of the Congo: Cuvette-Ouest: Congo River basin: Pandaka River, Odzala-Kokua National Park, 0.62°N, 14.92°E, Friel et al., August 2002: CUMV 88075, tag no. 5075, 71.0 mm SL, sex undetermined; CUMV 88081, tag no. 5084, 73.0 mm SL, male; CUMV 88082, tag no. 5085, 54.0 mm SL, sex undetermined; CUMV 88028, tag no. 5096, 74.0 mm SL, male; CUMV 88029, tag no. 5098, 74.0 mm SL, male; CUMV 88043, tag no. 5122, 73.0 mm SL, male; CUMV 88044, tag no. 5123, 66.0 mm SL, male; CUMV 88045, tag no. 5124, 73.0 mm SL, male; Republic of the Congo: Cuvette-Ouest: Congo River basin: Lokoué River, Odzala-Kokua National Park, 0.90°N, 15.12°E, Friel et al., August 2002: CUMV 88125, tag no. 5396, 74.0 mm SL, male; Republic of the Congo: Cuvette-Ouest: Congo River basin: small channel around island in Lékoli River, Odzala-Kokua National Park, 0.62°N, 14.92°E, Friel et al., August 2002: CUMV 88107, tag no. 5276, SL not measured, male; Republic of the Congo: Cuvette-Ouest: Congo River basin: Lékoli River, Odzala-Kokua National Park, 0.61°N, 14.93°E, Friel et al., August 2002: CUMV 88067, tag no. 5029, 59.0 mm SL, sex undetermined; CUMV 88068, tag no. 5030, 59.0 mm SL, sex undetermined; CUMV 88069, tag no. 5031, 57.0 mm SL, sex undetermined; Republic of the Congo: Cuvette-Ouest: Congo River basin: small stream entering Mambili River from the east between Moba and Lokoué, 0.87°N, 15.11°E, Friel et al. August 2002: CUMV 88128, tag no. 5423, 70.0 mm SL, male; Democratic Republic of Congo: Orientale Province: Congo basin: BMNH 2013.8.29.34, tag no. JPS-497, 76.0 mm SL, male [cytochrome PageBreakb gene determined, no EOD recorded], Lifundu River, 5 km downstream of Yangambi, 0.76°N, 24.24°E, Lavoué & Thumitho, 11 September 2010; BMNH 2013.8.29.125, tag no. JPS-511, 48.9 mm SL, sex undetermined [cytochrome b gene determined], Congo River at Yangambi, 0.76°N, 24.24°E, Lavoué et al., 11 September 2010. sp. n. is distinguished from all other species of Central Africa by the following combination of characteristics. Pigmentation pattern comprising three well-defined, bilateral black patches: one usually distinct (sometimes reduced in size, but rarely absent) round/ovoid subdorsal black mark situated slightly anterior to dorsal, one black mark at the base of each pectoral fin, and one ovoid black mark centered at the base of caudal fin. Dorsal fin at least one third shorter than anal fin (AFL/DFL ≥ 1.5, range = 1.5–1.7). Dorsal fin with at least 20 branched rays but no more than 22. Anal fin with at least 30 branched rays (range = 30–34). Sixteen teeth or fewer (range = 8–16) in upper jaw, 25 teeth or fewer (range = 20–25) in lower jaw. Eye relatively large (HL/ED ≤ 4.7, range = 3.5–4.7). Mouth subterminal; ratio of head length to mouth position (HL/MP) between 4.2 and 5.6. Mouth small (HL/MW ≥ 4.1, range = 4.1–5.0). EOD of normal polarity, mainly biphasic with sometimes the presence of a small-amplitude positive third phase. This description is based on the material from Odzala-Kokua National Park in the Republic of the Congo. Morphometric ratios and meristic data for the holotype and 17 paratypes are presented in Table 1. Maximum SL observed = 90.1 mm, holotype = 72.6 mm). Body ovoid, longer than high (2.3 ≤ SL/H ≤ 2.8, average = 2.6, holotype = 2.5) and laterally compressed. Head length between 3.4 and 4.0 times in standard length (average = 3.6, holotype = 3.4). Snout short (6.5 ≤ HL/SNL ≤ 9.3, average = 7.5, holotype = 8.3) and round. Eye large (3.5 ≤ HL/ED ≤ 4.4, average = 4.0, holotype = 4.1). Mouth small (4.1 ≤ HL/MW ≤ 5.0, average = 4.6, holotype = 4.5), subterminal, opening under the anterior half of the eye. Teeth small and bicuspid, 8 to 16 (median = 10) in a single row in the upper jaw, 20 to 24 (median = 21) in the lower jaw. Dorsal and anal fins originate in the posterior half of the body (1.4 ≤ SL/PDD ≤ 1.6 and 1.6 ≤ SL/PAD ≤ 1.7, respectively). Pre-dorsal distance slightly greater than the pre-anal distance (PDD/PAD = 1.1). Dorsal fin with 20–22 branched rays (median = 21). Anal fin with 31–34 branched rays (median = 32, holotype = 32). Scales cover the body, except for the head. Lateral line visible and complete with 34 to 38 pored scales along its length. Ten to 13 scales (median = 11), between the anterior base of the anal fin and the lateral line. Caudal peduncle thin (1.8 ≤ CPL/CPD ≤ 2.5, average = 2.2, holotype = 2.2). Twelve scales around the caudal peduncle. Skin on head thick. The three rosettes of Knollenorgans, Augenrosette, Nackenrosette and Kehlrosette, are present on the head. Electric organ discharge. Statistics for waveform landmarks and other EOD measurements are provided by Lavoué et al. (2008) for specimens recorded in Odzala-Kokua National Park, including the holotype and paratypes (specimens listed in Suppl. material 1). PageBreak sp. n. produces EOD waveforms largely similar to those of many species of this genus. In Odzala-Kokua, mean EOD duration (± std. dev.) is 0.330 ± 0.074 msec in sexually mature males and 0.270 ± 0.033 msec in other sex undetermined specimens. The EOD waveform characteristics of the only recorded specimen of sp. n. of Yangambi (Fig. 2B; EOD biphasic, relative height of peak 1 = 0.216, relative height of peak 2 = -0.784, duration of peak 1 = 0.185 msec, duration of peak 2 = 0.075 msec, total EOD duration = 0.260 msec) are similar to those of Odzala-Kokua specimens in all respects. Based on characteristics of the EODs, the electrocytes are assumed to have non-penetrating stalks and to be innervated posteriorly (Sullivan et al. 2000). Live coloration (Fig. 5; see also Fig. 3 in Lavoué et al. 2010). Body uniformly silvery white, with three distinct bilateral melanin marks: a distinct, ovoid black mark situated slightly anterior to the dorsal fin, sometimes covering only a few scales, a black spot at the base of the pectoral fin and a somewhat vertically oriented ovoid black mark centered at the base of the caudal fin that does not extend onto the upper and lower parts of the caudal fin. Fins hyaline. Photographs of type specimens of sp. n. from Odzala-Kokua National Park, Congo River, Republic of the Congo. Top photograph, a paratype specimen (CUMV 92390, 72.0 mm standard length) before preservation showing appearance in life; middle and bottom photographs represent the left and right sides of the preserved holotype (CUMV 88074, 71.6 mm standard length). Scale bar equals one centimeter. Preserved coloration (Fig. 5; see also Fig. 3 in Lavoué et al. 2010). Body light brown, with head and dorsum slightly darker. Thick skin on head opaque. Numerous light melanophores on body, slightly larger ventrally from the snout to the anal fin. Fins whitish/opaque. Distribution (Fig. 1). Endemic to the Congo River basin. Holotype and paratypes from Odzala-Kokua National Park (Republic of the Congo) where they were mainly collected along the main channel of the Lékoli River, northwestern Congo River basin. The two specimens collected at Yangambi will extend the distribution to the eastern part of the Congo basin’s central cuvette. Abundant in Odzala-Kokua but apparently rare at Yangambi (Poll and Gosse 1963). Phylogenetic affinities (Fig. 4). The Yangambi specimens and the Odzala-Kokua specimens of sp. n. are sister groups in the cytochrome b phylogenetic tree. sp. n. belongs to a clade containing and , two other species with a similar melanin pattern composed of three distinct black marks, but it is only distantly related to sp. n. As previously noted, is absent in this tree and its phylogenetic position is unknown. This species is dedicated to Matthew E. Arnegard, our friend and colleague, in recognition of his contributions to study of mormyrid evolution and diversification (e.g., Arnegard et al. 2005; Arnegard and Carlson 2005; Arnegard et al. 2010a; Arnegard et al. 2010b). Matthew Arnegard is additionally a member of the “ Team”: researchers associated with the Carl D. Hopkins Laboratory at Cornell University who have conducted field studies on African weakly electric fishes for more than 15 years. (“” is the plural form of the word for mormyrid fish in the Fang language of West Central Africa.).

Comparisons.

As for PageBreakPageBreak sp. n., the presence of three dark spots in sp. n. distinguishes this species from most of its congeners. As for other species having a similar pattern of melanin marking, sp. n. can easily be distinguished from by the presence of three electroreceptor rosettes on the head (versus absence of all three in ) and a higher number of anal fin rays (a minimum of 30 in sp. n. versus a maximum of 28 in ). Its high number of anal fin rays distinguishes sp. n. from and (30–34 in sp. n. versus a maximum of 27 and 20 in and , respectively). has a proportionally larger mouth (HL/MW = 2.7–3.9 versus 4.1–5.0 in sp. n.). sp. n. generally resembles to the holotype of , leading Lavoué et al. (2010) to assign these specimens from the Odzala-Kokua National Park to . However, sp. n. has a distinctly smaller mouth than (HL/MW = 4.4–5.2 in Odzala-Kokua specimens and 4.2 and 4.5 in the two Yangambi specimens versus 3.2 in the holotype of ) and a smaller interorbital width (HL/IOW ≥ 2.6 in Odzala-Kokua and Yangambi specimens versus 2.3 in the holotype of ). The faded pigmentation in the preserved holotype of precludes its accurate description and comparison (Fig. 6). Whereas a faded roundish black mark situated slightly anterior to the dorsal fin on each side of the flank and an ovoid black mark centered at the base of the caudal fin are visible on the preserved holotype, the presence of a black mark at the base of the pectoral fin is ambiguous (Fig. 6). In his description of , Pellegrin (1924) mentioned the subdorsal mark and the mark at the base of the anal fin, but did not make reference to any black mark at the origin of the pectoral fin. The black mark at the base of the pectoral fin in sp. n. is always present and intense. Pellegrin also described the black mark at the base of the caudal fin as crescent-like, extending onto the upper and lower rays of this fin (see drawing in Pellegrin 1928) whereas on the holotype this mark appears more ovoid and does not seem to extend onto any fin rays (Fig. 6). sp. n. is distinguished from sp. n. by a distinctly smaller mouth (SL/MW ≥ 14.7, range = 14.7–18.4 versus 14.2 in sp. n.), a slightly larger interorbital distance (HL/IOW ≤ 3.9, mean = 3.2 versus 3.7 in sp. n.) and the presence of a well-defined Augenrosette (versus reduced in sp. n.). In our phylogenetic tree (Fig. 4), sp. n. is not the sister group of sp. n.
Figure 6.

Top photograph, the preserved holotype of (MRAC 15191; 83.2 mm standard length) collected at Ikengo near the modern locality of Mbandaka, Equateur Province, in the Central Congo basin of Democratic Republic of Congo (Photo by Wilhelm Harder, reproduced courtesy of ETI Bioinformatics); bottom photograph, a specimen of (BMNH 2013.8.29.34) before preservation showing appearance in life, from Yangambi, Congo River, Democratic Republic of Congo.

Top photograph, the preserved holotype of (MRAC 15191; 83.2 mm standard length) collected at Ikengo near the modern locality of Mbandaka, Equateur Province, in the Central Congo basin of Democratic Republic of Congo (Photo by Wilhelm Harder, reproduced courtesy of ETI Bioinformatics); bottom photograph, a specimen of (BMNH 2013.8.29.34) before preservation showing appearance in life, from Yangambi, Congo River, Democratic Republic of Congo.
1Dorsal fin with fewer than 18 branched rays (rarely 18); only eight to 10 scale rows between the anterior base of the anal fin and the lateral line; distinct melanin markings absent on body (i.e., absence of black patches that are species-specific for many other Petrocephalus species); rosettes of Knollenorgan electroreceptors absent on the headPetrocephalus microphthalmus group
Note: Currently, the Petrocephalus microphthalmus group contains three morphologically similar valid species: Petrocephalus microphthalmus, Petrocephalus haullevillii, and Petrocephalus schoutedeni. The identification of each of these three species is currently challenging pending their taxonomic revision.
Dorsal fin usually with more than 20 branched rays (sometimes 20; in very rare instances 19); at least 10, usually more, scale rows between the anterior base of the anal fin and the lateral line; distinct melanin markings (black patches) may be present or absent on the body; electroreceptor rosettes present or absent on the head2
2Mouth large, its width at most 3.9 times in head length; at least 15 teeth in upper jaw, usually more3
Mouth small, its width at least 3.6 times (usually 4.0–4.4 times) in head length; usually fewer than 15 teeth in upper jaw (rarely 15 or 16)5
3Anal fin contains 26 or 27 branched rays; 20–22 branched rays in the dorsal fin; three bilateral intense black patches present: a rounded sub-dorsal mark, an ovoid caudal mark and a mark at the origin of the pectoral finPetrocephalus balayi
Anal fin with more than 30 branched rays; more than 24 branched rays in dorsal fin; only two distinct, bilateral black patches: a sub-dorsal mark and a caudal mark4
4Eye relatively small (HL/ED ≥ 4.0); mouth subterminal (HL/MP ≥ 4.4), opening under the anterior half of the eye; two distinct melanin marks present but sometimes pale: a rounded sub-dorsal mark and a crescent-like mark at the base of the caudal fin; Knollenorgan electroreceptors organized into three distinct rosettes on head, but rosettes relatively small; EOD waveform typical for the genus, polarity normal (see Fig. 10C in Lavoué et al. 2010)Petrocephalus sauvagii
Eye large (HL/ED ≤ 3.5); mouth subterminal but positioned more posteriorly along the ventral margin of the head (HL/MP ≤ 3.5), opening under the posterior half of the eye; two distinct melanin marks: a rounded, sometimes irregularly shaped, sub–dorsal black mark and a crescent-like black mark at the base of the caudal fin; three larger rosettes of Knollenorgan electroreceptors present on the head; EOD waveform very distinctive among congeners, appearing to be reversed in polarity compared to EODs of all other Petrocephalus species (see Fig. 11C in Lavoué et al. 2010)Petrocephalus pulsivertens
5Anal fin contains 30 or more branched rays; melanin markings (black patches) present on the body and always distinctly visible6
Anal fin contains at most 29 branched rays (usually fewer); melanin markings present but sometimes hardly visible9
6Dorsal fin contains 24–26 branched rays; eye large (HL/ED ≤ 3.2); mouth very small relative to many congeners (HL/MW ≥ 5.2); two melanin marks present and distinct but of medium intensity: a rounded sub-dorsal mark and a crescent-like mark at the base of the caudal fin; two readily observable rosettes of Knollenorgan electroreceptors present on the head (Augenrosette and Nackenrosette) plus a Kehlrosette that is rather difficult to observe without stainingPetrocephalus grandoculis
Dorsal fin contains 24 or fewer branched rays; eye smaller in size (3.5 ≤ HL/ED ≤ 4.7); mouth larger (HL/MW ≤ 5.2); three distinct melanin marks (black patches) present: an ovoid sub-dorsal mark (sometimes small but easily discernable), an ovoid mark at the base of the caudal fin and a mark at the origin of the pectoral fin; Nackenrosette and Kehlrosette present on the head and distinct; Augenrosette present but sometimes reduced in size to few, not densely packed, Knollenorgan pores7
7Augenrosette present but reduced in size to few Knollenorgan pores; narrow head (HL/HW = 2.4 and HL/IOW = 3.7)Petrocephalus boboto sp. n.
Augenrosette present and well distinct; wider head (HL/HW ≤ 2.2 and HL/IOW ≤ 3.9, average = 3.2)8
8Large mouth (SL/MW = 11.6 and HL/MW = 3.2); interorbital distance large (HL/IOW = 2.3); 24 dorsal fin branched raysPetrocephalus binotatus
Smaller mouth (SL/MW ≥ 14.7 and HL/MW ≥ 4.1); shorter interorbital distance (HL/IOW ≥ 2.6); 22 or fewer dorsal fin branched raysPetrocephalus arnegardi sp. n.
9Melanin markings on body intensely black with sharply defined edges, forming characteristic shapes (e.g., very rounded black sub-dorsal spot or saddle-like sub-dorsal patch, crescent shaped black mark at the base of the caudal fin or round black spot at the caudal fin base)10
Melanin markings of much weaker intensity, consisting of more irregularly–shaped patches and with diffuse edges12
10Small but intense black mark present on each side of the body at the pectoral fin origin; Knollenorgan electroreceptors on the head may or may not be arranged into discrete clusters (i.e., rosettes may be present or absent), but if present, Augenrosette is always as well developed as other two rosettes11
No distinct black mark visible at the origin of the pectoral fin; electroreceptors organized into three distinct rosettes on the head, but the Augenrosette is small and not as well developed as other two rosettesPetrocephalus christyi
11Eye large (HL/ED ≤ 3.3); sub-dorsal black patch often contacting contralateral mark over dorsum and anteriormost branched rays of the dorsal fin; caudal melanin mark forming a rather uniformly shaped crescent (or “V”) extending onto upper and lower fleshy lobes of caudal fin; Knollenorgan electroreceptors on the head not clustered into discrete groups (i.e., rosettes absent)Petrocephalus zakoni
Eye small (HL/ED ≥ 3.7); sub-dorsal black patch distinctly rounded, never in contact with contralateral mark and not extending onto dorsal fin; caudal mark ovoid rather than crescent- or V-shaped, not extending onto upper and lower parts of caudal fin; Knollenorgans on the head clustered into three rosettesPetrocephalus odzalaensis
12Mouth subterminal, opening under the anterior half of the eye; snout short (HL/SNL ≥ 6.5); Knollenorgan electroreceptors on head are clustered into three rosettes (but a distinctive Kehlrosette is difficult to observe without staining); EOD of normal polarity, often appearing to have an overall biphasic waveform at low gain, although a minute third peak is in fact present (first head-positive peak, P1, much larger in amplitude than second head-positive peak, P3, which never exceeds 10% of total peak-to-peak amplitude)Petrocephalus valentini
Mouth subterminal but positioned more caudally along ventral margin of head, opening under posterior half of eye; snout somewhat longer (HL/SNL = 5.4 in single specimen available, holotype); Knollenorgans on head clustered into only two rosettes (Nackenrosette and the Kehlrosette), Augenrosette absent; EOD of normal polarity, with more than two phases apparent even at low gain (the only specimen recorded exhibits an EOD containing 4 peaks; the second head-positive peak, P3, is larger in amplitude than the first head-positive peak, P1; amplitude of P3 substantially greater than 10% of total peak-to-peak amplitude)Petrocephalus mbossou
  11 in total

1.  Neural innovations and the diversification of African weakly electric fishes.

Authors:  Bruce A Carlson; Matthew E Arnegard
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2011-11-01

2.  Sexual signal evolution outpaces ecological divergence during electric fish species radiation.

Authors:  Matthew E Arnegard; Peter B McIntyre; Luke J Harmon; Miriam L Zelditch; William G R Crampton; Justin K Davis; John P Sullivan; Sébastien Lavoué; Carl D Hopkins
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Old gene duplication facilitates origin and diversification of an innovative communication system--twice.

Authors:  Matthew E Arnegard; Derrick J Zwickl; Ying Lu; Harold H Zakon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Multiple cases of striking genetic similarity between alternate electric fish signal morphs in sympatry.

Authors:  Matthew E Arnegard; Steven M Bogdanowicz; Carl D Hopkins
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models.

Authors:  Alexandros Stamatakis
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Petrocephalus of Odzala offer insights into evolutionary patterns of signal diversification in the Mormyridae, a family of weakly electrogenic fishes from Africa.

Authors:  Sébastien Lavoué; Matthew E Arnegard; John P Sullivan; Carl D Hopkins
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2008-10-17

7.  Rates of speciation and morphological evolution are correlated across the largest vertebrate radiation.

Authors:  Daniel L Rabosky; Francesco Santini; Jonathan Eastman; Stephen A Smith; Brian Sidlauskas; Jonathan Chang; Michael E Alfaro
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Brain evolution triggers increased diversification of electric fishes.

Authors:  Bruce A Carlson; Saad M Hasan; Michael Hollmann; Derek B Miller; Luke J Harmon; Matthew E Arnegard
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  [On the structure of the epidermal sensory organs of Mormyridae (Mormyriformes, Teleostei)].

Authors:  W Harder
Journal:  Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat       Date:  1968

10.  Molecular systematics of the African electric fishes (Mormyroidea: teleostei) and a model for the evolution of their electric organs.

Authors:  J P Sullivan; S Lavoué; C D Hopkins
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  4 in total

1.  ZooKeys 500: traditions and innovations hand-in-hand servicing our taxonomic community.

Authors:  Terry Erwin; Pavel Stoev; Teodor Georgiev; Lyubomir Penev
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 1.546

2.  MiFish, a set of universal PCR primers for metabarcoding environmental DNA from fishes: detection of more than 230 subtropical marine species.

Authors:  M Miya; Y Sato; T Fukunaga; T Sado; J Y Poulsen; K Sato; T Minamoto; S Yamamoto; H Yamanaka; H Araki; M Kondoh; W Iwasaki
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.963

3.  Cryptomyrus: a new genus of Mormyridae (Teleostei, Osteoglossomorpha) with two new species from Gabon, West-Central Africa.

Authors:  John P Sullivan; Sébastien Lavoué; Carl D Hopkins
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 1.546

4.  Plectorhinchus makranensis (Teleostei, Haemulidae), a new species of sweetlips from the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman.

Authors:  Ehsan Damadi; Faezeh Yazdani Moghaddam; Fereshteh Ghassemzadeh; Mehdi Ghanbarifardi
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 1.546

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.