Shaneela Shahid1, Sourabh Dutta1, Amanda Symington1, Sandesh Shivananda2. 1. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University and Children's Hospital Hamilton, Ontario. 2. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University and Children's Hospital Hamilton, Ontario sandesh@mcmaster.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Absence of guidelines on umbilical arterial catheter (UAC) and umbilical venous catheter (UVC) use and inability to predict the hospital course may sway the frontline staff to overuse umbilical catheters in preterm infants. Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility of implementing guidelines standardizing the use of umbilical catheters and its impact on the incidence of sepsis and resource use. METHODS: All inborn infants delivered at <33 weeks' gestation and admitted to the NICU were included in this quality improvement study. The primary outcome was proportion of infants receiving umbilical catheters. Secondary outcomes were central venous catheter (CVC) use and central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). RESULTS: The proportion of infants receiving UACs and UVCs was significantly lower in postintervention (sustainment) phase than in the preintervention phase (93 [42.3%] vs 52 [23.6%], P = .0001) and (137 [62.6%] vs 93 [42.3%], P = .0001), respectively. There was no corresponding increase in the proportion of infants receiving peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) or surgical CVCs (SCVCs) during the sustainment phase. There was a significant reduction in the proportion of infants receiving CVCs (UVC, PICC, and SCVC) in the sustainment phase. The incidence of CLABSI was similar in the preintervention and sustainment phases. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of guidelines standardizing the use of umbilical catheters in the NICU is feasible. Fewer infants were exposed to the risk of UVC or UAC, and fewer resources were used.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Absence of guidelines on umbilical arterial catheter (UAC) and umbilical venous catheter (UVC) use and inability to predict the hospital course may sway the frontline staff to overuse umbilical catheters in preterm infants. Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility of implementing guidelines standardizing the use of umbilical catheters and its impact on the incidence of sepsis and resource use. METHODS: All inborninfants delivered at <33 weeks' gestation and admitted to the NICU were included in this quality improvement study. The primary outcome was proportion of infants receiving umbilical catheters. Secondary outcomes were central venous catheter (CVC) use and central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). RESULTS: The proportion of infants receiving UACs and UVCs was significantly lower in postintervention (sustainment) phase than in the preintervention phase (93 [42.3%] vs 52 [23.6%], P = .0001) and (137 [62.6%] vs 93 [42.3%], P = .0001), respectively. There was no corresponding increase in the proportion of infants receiving peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) or surgical CVCs (SCVCs) during the sustainment phase. There was a significant reduction in the proportion of infants receiving CVCs (UVC, PICC, and SCVC) in the sustainment phase. The incidence of CLABSI was similar in the preintervention and sustainment phases. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of guidelines standardizing the use of umbilical catheters in the NICU is feasible. Fewer infants were exposed to the risk of UVC or UAC, and fewer resources were used.
Authors: G Escourrou; L Renesme; E Zana; A Rideau; M O Marcoux; E Lopez; G Gascoin; P Kuhn; P Tourneux; I Guellec; C Flamant Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2017-05-04 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: A J Vachharajani; N A Vachharajani; H Morris; A Niesen; A Elward; D A Linck; A M Mathur Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2017-01-12 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: S Shivananda; S Gupta; S Thomas; L Babb; C-L Meyer; A Symington; B Paes; G K Suresh Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2016-11-10 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Mihai Puia-Dumitrescu; David T Tanaka; Tracy G Spears; Cecil J Daniel; Karan R Kumar; Kamlesh Athavale; Sandra E Juul; P Brian Smith Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2019-10-03 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Emma G Duerden; Ruth E Grunau; Vann Chau; Floris Groenendaal; Ting Guo; M Mallar Chakravarty; Manon Benders; Nienke Wagenaar; Rian Eijsermans; Corine Koopman; Anne Synnes; Linda de Vries; Steven P Miller Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 9.910