Literature DB >> 24842925

Deficiency of double-strand DNA break repair does not impair Mycobacterium tuberculosis virulence in multiple animal models of infection.

Brook E Heaton1, Daniel Barkan2, Paola Bongiorno1, Petros C Karakousis3, Michael S Glickman4.   

Abstract

Mycobacterium tuberculosis persistence within its human host requires mechanisms to resist the effector molecules of host immunity, which exert their bactericidal effects through damaging pathogen proteins, membranes, and DNA. Substantial evidence indicates that bacterial pathogens, including M. tuberculosis, require DNA repair systems to repair the DNA damage inflicted by the host during infection, but the role of double-strand DNA break (DSB) repair systems is unclear. Double-strand DNA breaks are the most cytotoxic form of DNA damage and must be repaired for chromosome replication to proceed. M. tuberculosis elaborates three genetically distinct DSB repair systems: homologous recombination (HR), nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), and single-strand annealing (SSA). NHEJ, which repairs DSBs in quiescent cells, may be particularly relevant to M. tuberculosis latency. However, very little information is available about the phenotype of DSB repair-deficient M. tuberculosis in animal models of infection. Here we tested M. tuberculosis strains lacking NHEJ (a Δku ΔligD strain), HR (a ΔrecA strain), or both (a ΔrecA Δku strain) in C57BL/6J mice, C3HeB/FeJ mice, guinea pigs, and a mouse hollow-fiber model of infection. We found no difference in bacterial load, histopathology, or host mortality between wild-type and DSB repair mutant strains in any model of infection. These results suggest that the animal models tested do not inflict DSBs on the mycobacterial chromosome, that other repair pathways can compensate for the loss of NHEJ and HR, or that DSB repair is not required for M. tuberculosis pathogenesis.
Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24842925      PMCID: PMC4136208          DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01540-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Immun        ISSN: 0019-9567            Impact factor:   3.441


  42 in total

1.  Distinct DNA repair pathways involving RecA and nonhomologous end joining in Mycobacterium smegmatis.

Authors:  Malgorzata Korycka-Machala; Anna Brzostek; Sylwia Rozalska; Anna Rumijowska-Galewicz; Renata Dziedzic; Richard Bowater; Jaroslaw Dziadek
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 2.  Bacterial DNA repair by non-homologous end joining.

Authors:  Stewart Shuman; Michael S Glickman
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  The pathways and outcomes of mycobacterial NHEJ depend on the structure of the broken DNA ends.

Authors:  Jideofor Aniukwu; Michael S Glickman; Stewart Shuman
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Atomic structure and nonhomologous end-joining function of the polymerase component of bacterial DNA ligase D.

Authors:  Hui Zhu; Jayakrishnan Nandakumar; Jideofor Aniukwu; Li Kai Wang; Michael S Glickman; Christopher D Lima; Stewart Shuman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Trans-cyclopropanation of mycolic acids on trehalose dimycolate suppresses Mycobacterium tuberculosis -induced inflammation and virulence.

Authors:  Vivek Rao; Feng Gao; Bing Chen; William R Jacobs; Michael S Glickman
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Accelerated detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis genes essential for bacterial survival in guinea pigs, compared with mice.

Authors:  Sanjay K Jain; S Moises Hernandez-Abanto; Qi-Jian Cheng; Prabhpreet Singh; Lan H Ly; Lee G Klinkenberg; Norman E Morrison; Paul J Converse; Eric Nuermberger; Jacques Grosset; David N McMurray; Petros C Karakousis; Gyanu Lamichhane; William R Bishai
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Mycobacterial nonhomologous end joining mediates mutagenic repair of chromosomal double-strand DNA breaks.

Authors:  Nicolas C Stephanou; Feng Gao; Paola Bongiorno; Sabine Ehrt; Dirk Schnappinger; Stewart Shuman; Michael S Glickman
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Crystal structure and nonhomologous end-joining function of the ligase component of Mycobacterium DNA ligase D.

Authors:  David Akey; Alexandra Martins; Jideofor Aniukwu; Michael S Glickman; Stewart Shuman; James M Berger
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-02-13       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  NHEJ protects mycobacteria in stationary phase against the harmful effects of desiccation.

Authors:  Robert S Pitcher; Andrew J Green; Anna Brzostek; Malgorzata Korycka-Machala; Jaroslaw Dziadek; Aidan J Doherty
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2007-03-13

10.  Either non-homologous ends joining or homologous recombination is required to repair double-strand breaks in the genome of macrophage-internalized Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Anna Brzostek; Izabela Szulc; Magdalena Klink; Marta Brzezinska; Zofia Sulowska; Jaroslaw Dziadek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Bacterial nonhomologous end joining requires teamwork.

Authors:  Lindsay A Matthews; Lyle A Simmons
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 2.  Methodological and Clinical Aspects of the Molecular Epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Other Mycobacteria.

Authors:  Tomasz Jagielski; Alina Minias; Jakko van Ingen; Nalin Rastogi; Anna Brzostek; Anna Żaczek; Jarosław Dziadek
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium marinum non-homologous end-joining proteins can function together to join DNA ends in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Douglas G Wright; Reneau Castore; Runhua Shi; Amrita Mallick; Don G Ennis; Lynn Harrison
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 4.  DNA Replication in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Zanele Ditse; Meindert H Lamers; Digby F Warner
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2017-03

5.  Antimicrobial Activity of Quinazolin Derivatives of 1,2-Di(quinazolin-4-yl)diselane against Mycobacteria.

Authors:  Bikui Tang; Meili Wei; Qun Niu; Yinjiu Huang; Shuo Ru; Xiaofen Liu; Lin Shen; Qiang Fang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Compromised base excision repair pathway in Mycobacterium tuberculosis imparts superior adaptability in the host.

Authors:  Saba Naz; Shruti Dabral; Sathya Narayanan Nagarajan; Divya Arora; Lakshya Veer Singh; Pradeep Kumar; Yogendra Singh; Dhiraj Kumar; Umesh Varshney; Vinay Kumar Nandicoori
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 6.823

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.