| Literature DB >> 24842811 |
Paul J Feldblum1, Sónia Enosse2, Karine Dubé3, Paulo Arnaldo2, Chadreque Muluana2, Reginaldo Banze2, Aristides Nhanala2, Joana Cunaca2, Pai-Lien Chen1, Merlin L Robb4, Ricardo Thompson2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reliable HIV incidence estimates for Mozambique are limited. We conducted a prospective HIV incidence study as part of a clinical research site development initiative in Chókwè district, Gaza Province, southern Mozambique.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24842811 PMCID: PMC4026130 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097547
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Baseline features of women entering Cross-sectional and Prospective Phases, Chókwè, Mozambique.
| Cross-Sectional Phase N (% | Prospective Phase N (% | |
| 1429 | 479 | |
|
| ||
| Median (IQR) | 23 (20–27) | 22 (19–26) |
| 18–24 | 864 (60.5) | 323 (67.4) |
| 25–29 | 369 (25.8) | 115 (24.0) |
| 30+ | 196 (13.7) | 41 (8.6) |
|
| ||
| None | 366 (25.6) | 82 (17.1) |
| Primary school (grade 1–5) | 438 (30.7) | 139 (29.0) |
| Secondary school (grade 6–9) | 439 (30.7) | 175 (36.5) |
| High school and higher | 186 (13.0) | 83 (17.3) |
|
| ||
| Unemployed | 767 (53.7) | 248 (51.8) |
| Employed | 147 (10.3) | 52 (10.9) |
| Other | 514 (36.0) | 179 (37.4) |
| Missing | 1 (0.1) | – |
|
| ||
| Office work, sales | 285 (19.9) | 86 (18.0) |
| Manual labor, food service | 30 (2.1) | 6 (1.3) |
| Student | 150 (16.9) | 125 (26.1) |
| Sex worker | 2 (0.2) | 0 (0.0) |
| Other | 54 (3.8) | 14 (2.9) |
| Missing | 767 (53.7) | 248 (51.8) |
|
| ||
| Unmarried | 762 (53.3) | 234 (48.9) |
| Married | 560 (39.2) | 206 (43.0) |
| Other | 107 (7.5) | 39 (8.1) |
|
| 1.5 (1.0) | 1.4 (1.0) |
|
| ||
| Median (IQR) | 1 (1–2) | 1 (1–2) |
| <2 | 778 (54.4) | 322 (67.2) |
| 2+ | 651 (45.6) | 157 (32.8) |
|
| ||
| 0 | 1226 (85.8) | 441 (92.1) |
| 1 | 164 (11.5) | 31 (6.5) |
| 2+ | 39 (2.7) | 7 (1.5) |
|
| ||
| None | 740 (51.8) | 219 (45.7) |
| Oral | 298 (20.9) | 108 (22.5) |
| Injectable | 182 (12.7) | 62 (12.9) |
| Condoms | 198 (13.9) | 89 (18.6) |
| Other/Missing | 11 (0.8) | 1 (0.2) |
Column percentage.
IQR = interquartile range.
Factors associated with prevalent HIV infection for women enrolled in the Cross-sectional Phase, Chókwè, Mozambique (N = 1429).
| Bivariable Analysis | Multivariable Analysis | |||
| Odds Ratio (95% CI) | p-value | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | p-value | |
|
| ||||
| < = 24 | 0.5 (0.4, 0.6) | <0.001 | 0.6 (0.4, 0.7) | <0.001 |
| >24 | Reference | Reference | ||
|
| ||||
| > = Grade 10 | 0.3 (0.2, 0.5) | <0.001 | 0.4 (0.3, 0.7) | <0.001 |
| Grade<10 | Reference | Reference | ||
|
| ||||
| Yes | 1.5 (0.9, 2.4) | 0.15 | ||
| No | Reference | |||
|
| ||||
| Yes | 2.0 (1.4, 2.8) | <0.001 | 1.5 (1.0, 2.3) | 0.07 |
| No | Reference | Reference | ||
|
| ||||
| Yes | 1.7 (1.2, 2.3) | 0.001 | 1.2 (0.8, 1.7) | 0.45 |
| No | Reference | Reference | ||
|
| ||||
| Without using | 0.9 (0.7, 1.1) | 0.22 | ||
| Using | Reference | |||
|
| ||||
| Without using | 1.5 (1.2, 1.9) | <0.001 | 1.1 (0.9, 1.5) | 0.43 |
| Using | Reference | Reference | ||
|
| ||||
| Hormonal method | 0.6 (0.5, 0.8) | <0.001 | 0.6 (0.4, 0.7) | <0.001 |
| Condom | 0.3 (0.2, 0.5) | <0.001 | 0.5 (0.3, 0.7) | <0.001 |
| Other | 2.7 (0.8, 9.6) | 0.13 | 3.2 (0.9, 12.2) | 0.09 |
| Nothing | Reference | Reference | ||
Factors associated with incident HIV for women enrolled in the Prospective Phase, Chokwe, Mozambique (N = 479).
| Bi-variable Analysis | ||
| Unadjusted HR (95% CI) | p-value | |
|
| 1.0 (0.9,1.1) | 0.67 |
|
| ||
| ≥ Grade 10 | 0.6 (0.1,2.8) | 0.56 |
| <Grade 10 | Reference | |
|
| ||
| Yes | 3.4 (0.5,25.9) | 0.23 |
| No | Reference | |
|
| ||
| Yes | 0.4 (0.1,1.2) | 0.10 |
| No | Reference | |
|
| ||
| Yes | 0.7 (0.1,4.9) | 0.68 |
| No | Reference | |
|
| ||
| without using | 0.7 (0.3,1.8) | 0.45 |
| Using | Reference | |
|
| ||
| without using | 2.5 (0.8,7.8) | 0.10 |
| Using | Reference | |
|
| ||
| Hormonal method | 0.4 (0.1,1.3) | 0.14 |
| Condom | 0.4 (0.1,2.0) | 0.28 |
| Other | 0.0 (0.0,0.0) | 0.99 |
| Nothing | Reference | |
HR = hazard ratio.