Literature DB >> 24842753

Relative performance of three formulas to assess renal function at predicting in-hospital hemorrhagic complications in an acute coronary syndrome population. What does the new CKD-EPI formula provide?

Pilar Cabanas-Grandío1, Emad Abu-Assi2, Sergio Raposeiras-Roubin1, Belén Alvarez-Alvarez1, Cristina González-Cambeiro1, Santiago Gestal Romaní1, Eva Pereira-López1, Noelia Bouzas-Cruz1, Andrea López-López1, Mar Rodríguez-Girondo3, Milagros Pedreira1, José María García-Acuña1, José Ramón González-Juanatey1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Assessment of renal function is important for bleeding risk stratification in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). There are three formulas routinely used to assess renal function: the Cockroft-Gault (C-G) formula, the MDRD-4 formula and the new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. Our aim was to compare the ability of these formulas to predict the risk of in-hospital bleeding in patients with ACS.
METHODS: The study included 3270 patients with ACS. The performance of each formula with respect to in-hospital TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) major or TIMI minor bleeding were assessed using continuous data and by dividing patients into four subgroups according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): ≥90, 89-60, 30-59 and <30 ml/min/1.73 m(2).
RESULTS: Bleeding predictive ability was significantly higher for the C-G formula than for MDRD-4 and CKD-EPI formulas, as evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC); continuous eGFR AUCs: 0.73, 0.69 and 0.71, respectively; categorical eGFR AUCs: 0.71, 0.66 and 0.68, respectively. Net reclassification improvement based on the eGFR categories was significantly positively favored C-G: 9.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-17.2%) and 19.1% (95% CI 11.3-26.9%) compared with CKD-EPI and MDRD-4, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, the C-G formula predicted in-hospital bleeding better than MDRD-4 formula (severe renal dysfunction vs. normal renal function: odds ratio 7.98, 95% CI 2.61-24.38 with C-G; odds ratio 3.76, 95% CI 1.63-8.69 with MDRD-4; and odds ratio 5.77, 95% CI 2.18-15.24 with CKD-EPI.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the C-G eGFR may improve risk prediction of in-hospital bleeding more than the MDRD-4 equation and the new CKD-EPI equation in patients with ACS. © The European Society of Cardiology 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Renal function; acute coronary syndrome; bleeding

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24842753     DOI: 10.1177/2048872614521757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care        ISSN: 2048-8726


  2 in total

1.  Disparities in the Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate According to Cockcroft-Gault, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease-4, and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration Equations and Relation With Outcomes in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  José Miguel Rivera-Caravaca; Juan Miguel Ruiz-Nodar; Antonio Tello-Montoliu; María Asunción Esteve-Pastor; Miriam Quintana-Giner; Andrea Véliz-Martínez; Esteban Orenes-Piñero; Ana Isabel Romero-Aniorte; Nuria Vicente-Ibarra; Vicente Pernias-Escrig; Luna Carrillo-Alemán; Elena Candela-Sánchez; Ignacio Hortelano; Beatriz Villamía; Miriam Sandín-Rollán; Laura Nuñez-Martínez; Mariano Valdés; Francisco Marín
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 5.501

2.  Comparison of five glomerular filtration rate estimating equations as predictors of acute kidney injury after cardiovascular surgery.

Authors:  Jun-Young Jo; Seung Ah Ryu; Jong-Il Kim; Eun-Ho Lee; In-Cheol Choi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.