OBJECTIVE: To evaluate perioperative details, long-term outcomes, and postsurgical fertility in case of laparoscopic ureterolysis for deep endometriosis. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTING: Academic research center. PATIENT(S): One hundred nine consecutive women who underwent laparoscopic ureterolysis for deep endometriosis. INTERVENTION(S): Laparoscopic excision of ureteral endometriosis (ureteral shaving was attempted in all cases). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Perioperative details, long-term outcomes, fertility rates, and need for secondary surgery, stratifying on presence/absence of hydronephrosis. Predictors of longer operative time, pain recurrence, and fertility were also investigated. RESULT(S): No conversion to open surgery was necessary. Intraoperative ureteral injury occurred in one case (0.9%). Nine women (8.3%) underwent ureteral stenting. Eight cases (7.3%) of mild postoperative complications were registered; no case of severe complications or postoperative ureteral fistula occurred. An increase was observed in the risk of short-/long-term adverse outcomes, according to the grade of preoperative hydronephrosis. Of the 80 women with available follow-up data, secondary ureteral procedures were necessary in 5 women (6.3%), whereas 22 patients (27.5%) had recurrence of endometriosis symptoms. Among the 36 women who wished to conceive, a total of 26 pregnancies were registered in 20 women (55.6%). The miscarriage rate was 15.6%. Hydronephrosis grade≥2 was independently associated with longer operative time and higher rate of symptoms recurrence. Adjuvant hormonal therapy after ureterolysis was the only independent factor associated with lower fertility rates. CONCLUSION(S): Laparoscopic ureterolysis is a safe procedure, with encouraging pregnancy rates and satisfactory long-term results. However, hydronephrosis grade≥2 is associated with worse outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate perioperative details, long-term outcomes, and postsurgical fertility in case of laparoscopic ureterolysis for deep endometriosis. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTING: Academic research center. PATIENT(S): One hundred nine consecutive women who underwent laparoscopic ureterolysis for deep endometriosis. INTERVENTION(S): Laparoscopic excision of ureteral endometriosis (ureteral shaving was attempted in all cases). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Perioperative details, long-term outcomes, fertility rates, and need for secondary surgery, stratifying on presence/absence of hydronephrosis. Predictors of longer operative time, pain recurrence, and fertility were also investigated. RESULT(S): No conversion to open surgery was necessary. Intraoperative ureteral injury occurred in one case (0.9%). Nine women (8.3%) underwent ureteral stenting. Eight cases (7.3%) of mild postoperative complications were registered; no case of severe complications or postoperative ureteral fistula occurred. An increase was observed in the risk of short-/long-term adverse outcomes, according to the grade of preoperative hydronephrosis. Of the 80 women with available follow-up data, secondary ureteral procedures were necessary in 5 women (6.3%), whereas 22 patients (27.5%) had recurrence of endometriosis symptoms. Among the 36 women who wished to conceive, a total of 26 pregnancies were registered in 20 women (55.6%). The miscarriage rate was 15.6%. Hydronephrosis grade≥2 was independently associated with longer operative time and higher rate of symptoms recurrence. Adjuvant hormonal therapy after ureterolysis was the only independent factor associated with lower fertility rates. CONCLUSION(S): Laparoscopic ureterolysis is a safe procedure, with encouraging pregnancy rates and satisfactory long-term results. However, hydronephrosis grade≥2 is associated with worse outcomes.
Authors: Erin M Nesbitt-Hawes; Neil Campbell; Peta E Maley; Haryun Won; Dona Hooshmand; Amanda Henry; William Ledger; Jason A Abbott Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-07-12 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Mert Ali Karadag; Turgut Aydin; Ozge Idem Karadag; Huseyin Aksoy; Aslan Demir; Kursat Cecen; Umit Yener Tekdogan; Urfettin Huseyinoglu; Fatih Altunrende Journal: J Med Case Rep Date: 2014-12-11