Literature DB >> 24842393

To what extent is women's economic situation associated with cancer screening uptake when nationwide screening exists? A study of breast and cervical cancer screening in France in 2010.

Gwenn Menvielle1, Jean-Baptiste Richard, Virginie Ringa, Rosemary Dray-Spira, François Beck.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In France, larger social inequalities are reported for cervical cancer screening, based on individual practice, than for breast cancer screening for which organized screening exists. Our aim was to investigate the association between women's economic situation and breast and cervical cancer screening.
METHODS: We used data from a large French national health survey conducted in 2010. The economic situation was assessed using the number of adverse economic conditions respondents were facing, based on three variables (low income, lacking food, and perceived financial difficulties). Logistic regressions were adjusted for socioeconomic and sociodemographic characteristics, healthcare use and insurance, and health behaviors.
RESULTS: Mammography was less frequent among women experiencing two or more adverse economic conditions, whereas Pap smear was less frequent among women experiencing at least one adverse economic condition. For both screenings, higher rates were observed among women who lived in the Paris region. Sociodemographic indicators and health behaviors were associated with Pap smear, whereas healthcare use and insurance characteristics were associated with mammography.
CONCLUSIONS: The women's economic situation is an important determinant of breast and cervical cancer screening in France in 2010. Alleviating economic barriers to female cancers screening should be a priority in future programs implementation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24842393     DOI: 10.1007/s10552-014-0397-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  17 in total

1.  Cervical Cancer Screening Experiences Among Chinese American Immigrant Women in the United States.

Authors:  Jin Young Seo; Junxin Li; Kun Li
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2017-11-13

2.  Social Inequalities in Participation in Cervical Cancer Screening in a Metropolitan Area Implementing a Pilot Organised Screening Programme (Paris Region, France).

Authors:  Celine Audiger; Thomas Bovagnet; Julia Bardes; Gaelle Abihsera; Jerome Nicolet; Michel Deghaye; Audrey Bochaton; Gwenn Menvielle
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 5.100

3.  Adherence to cancer screening guidelines in Australian survivors of allogeneic blood and marrow transplantation (BMT).

Authors:  Gemma Dyer; Stephen R Larsen; Nicole Gilroy; Lisa Brice; Matt Greenwood; Mark Hertzberg; Masura Kabir; Louisa Brown; Megan Hogg; Gillian Huang; John Moore; David Gottlieb; John Kwan; Jeff Tan; Christopher Ward; Ian Kerridge
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 4.452

4.  Ethical Hurdles in the Prioritization of Oncology Care.

Authors:  Folkert de Groot; Stefano Capri; Jean-Claude Castanier; David Cunningham; Bruno Flamion; Mathias Flume; Harald Herholz; Lars-Åke Levin; Oriol Solà-Morales; Christoph J Rupprecht; Natalie Shalet; Andrew Walker; Olivier Wong
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.561

5.  Significant variations in the cervical cancer screening rate in China by individual-level and geographical measures of socioeconomic status: a multilevel model analysis of a nationally representative survey dataset.

Authors:  Heling Bao; Lei Zhang; Limin Wang; Mei Zhang; Zhenping Zhao; Liwen Fang; Shu Cong; Maigeng Zhou; Linhong Wang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Mammography Use in Portugal: National Health Survey 2014.

Authors:  Sofia Chkotua; Bárbara Peleteiro
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  Cervical and breast cancer screening participation for women with chronic conditions in France: results from a national health survey.

Authors:  Panayotis Constantinou; Rosemary Dray-Spira; Gwenn Menvielle
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Assessment and model guided cancer screening promotion by village doctors in China: a randomized controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Rui Feng; Xingrong Shen; Jing Chai; Penglai Chen; Jing Cheng; Han Liang; Ting Zhao; Rui Sha; Kaichun Li; Debin Wang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  The association between cervical cancer screening participation and the deprivation index of the location of the family doctor's office.

Authors:  Fanny Serman; Jonathan Favre; Valérie Deken; Lydia Guittet; Claire Collins; Michaël Rochoy; Nassir Messaadi; Alain Duhamel; Ludivine Launay; Christophe Berkhout; Thibaut Raginel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Temporal trend in socioeconomic inequalities in the uptake of cancer screening programmes in France between 2005 and 2010: results from the Cancer Barometer surveys.

Authors:  David Mark Kelly; Carla Estaquio; Christophe Léon; Pierre Arwidson; Hermann Nabi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.