Literature DB >> 24842312

Different subjective awareness measures demonstrate the influence of visual identification on perceptual awareness ratings.

Michał Wierzchoń1, Borysław Paulewicz2, Dariusz Asanowicz3, Bert Timmermans4, Axel Cleeremans5.   

Abstract

We compare four subjective awareness measures in the context of a visual identification task and investigate quantitative differences in terms of scale use and correlation with task performance. We also analyse the effect of identification task decisions on subsequent subjective reports. Results show that awareness ratings strongly predict accuracy for all scale types, although the type of awareness measure may influence the reported level of perceptual awareness. Surprisingly, the overall relationship between awareness ratings and performance was weaker when participants rated their awareness before providing identification responses. Furthermore, the Perceptual Awareness Scale was most exhaustive only when used after the identification task, whereas confidence ratings were most exhaustive when used before the identification task. We conclude that the type of subjective measure applied may influence the reports on visual awareness. We also propose that identification task decisions may affect subsequent awareness ratings.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Confidence ratings; Consciousness, higher-order theories of consciousness; Feeling of warmth; Perceptual awareness scale; Post-decision wagering; Subjective measures of awareness; Visual identification task

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24842312     DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  15 in total

1.  Predictions Shape Confidence in Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus.

Authors:  Maxine T Sherman; Anil K Seth; Ryota Kanai
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Inflation versus filling-in: why we feel we see more than we actually do in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Brian Odegaard; Min Yu Chang; Hakwan Lau; Sing-Hang Cheung
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Sure I'm Sure: Prefrontal Oscillations Support Metacognitive Monitoring of Decision Making.

Authors:  Martijn E Wokke; Axel Cleeremans; K Richard Ridderinkhof
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Evidence of weak conscious experiences in the exclusion task.

Authors:  Kristian Sandberg; Simon H Del Pin; Bo M Bibby; Morten Overgaard
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-23

5.  Visibility Is Not Equivalent to Confidence in a Low Contrast Orientation Discrimination Task.

Authors:  Manuel Rausch; Michael Zehetleitner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-04-26

6.  Post-Decision Wagering Affects Metacognitive Awareness of Emotional Stimuli: An Event Related Potential Study.

Authors:  Michał Wierzchoń; Eligiusz Wronka; Borysław Paulewicz; Remigiusz Szczepanowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  But I Was So Sure! Metacognitive Judgments Are Less Accurate Given Prospectively than Retrospectively.

Authors:  Marta Siedlecka; Borysław Paulewicz; Michał Wierzchoń
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-19

8.  Self-evaluation of decision-making: A general Bayesian framework for metacognitive computation.

Authors:  Stephen M Fleming; Nathaniel D Daw
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Consciousness: individuated information in action.

Authors:  Jakub Jonkisz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-29

10.  The development of a sense of control scale.

Authors:  Mia Y Dong; Kristian Sandberg; Bo M Bibby; Michael N Pedersen; Morten Overgaard
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.