| Literature DB >> 24842143 |
Maedeh Ghasemi1, Naser Khodaei2, Sajjad Salari3, Afsaneh Eliassi1,2,4, Reza Saghiri5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Defects in endoplasmic reticulum homeostasis are common occurrences in different diseases, such as diabetes, in which the function of endoplasmic reticulum is disrupted. It is now well established that ion channels of endoplasmic reticulum membrane have a critical role in endoplasmic reticulum luminal homeostasis. Our previous studies showed the presence of an ATP-sensitive cationic channel in endoplasmic reticulum. Therefore, in this study, we examined and compared the activities of this channel in control and diabetic rats using single-channel recording techniques.Entities:
Keywords: Endoplasmic reticulum; Diabetes; Ion channels; Bilayer lipid membrane; Liver
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24842143 PMCID: PMC4048481 DOI: 10.6091/ibj.1308.2014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran Biomed J ISSN: 1028-852X
Fig. 1Configuration of the cis and trans faces. The cis chamber (cytoplasmic face) was voltage-clamped relative to the trans chamber (luminal face), which was grounded
Fig. 2Single-channel recordings as a function of voltages. Single-channel recordings in 200/50 mMKCl (cis/trans) gradient after reconstitution of liver rough endoplasmic reticulum membrane vesicles in planar lipid bilayer at potentials ranging from +30 to -40 mV in control (A) and diabetic (B) condition. The – indicates the closed state.
Fig. 3The comparison of single-channel current voltage relationships between diabetes and control. Data points are mean ± s.e.m., obtained from five experiments
The average steady-state of open probability values as a function of the holding potential for full open conducting state obtained from five different experiments in control and diabetic conditions
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| +60 | 0.12 ± 0.07 | 0[ |
| +50 | 0.20 ± 0.10 | 0[ |
| +40 | 0.53 ± 0.20 | 0[ |
| +30 | 0.73 ± 0.10 | 0.66 ± 0.10 |
| +20 | 0.83 ± 0.05 | 0.80 ± 0.06 |
| +10 | 0.81 ± 0.10 | 0.81 ± 0.08 |
| 0 | 0.90 ± 0.04 | 0.88 ± 0.06 |
| -10 | 0.90 ± 0.08 | 0.90 ± 0.01 |
| -20 | 0.93 ± 0.01 | 0.94 ± 0.04 |
| -40 | 0.90 ± 0.09 | 0.94 ± 0.10 |
| -50 | 0.91 ± 0.08 | 0.94 ± 0.04 |
P<0.001 different from control group
Fig. 4Single-channel recording at +40 mV in control and diabetic conditions. (A) Single-channel recording at +40 mV in control (~20 second recording) and diabetic conditions (~3 minutes recording). Significant differences in the open probability value and amplitude are not observed (n = 5). Summarized data show current amplitudes and open probability of reconstituted channels in control and diabetic conditions at +40 mV. Significant differences in the open probability value but not current amplitude are observed (n = 5). (B) Current record (above) and applied voltage protocol (below) in diabetic rats. Re-openings of the channel can be observed when the +40 mV was switched to +30 mV in the same bilayer lipid membrane. The – indicates the closed levels
Fig. 5The effect of ATP and glibenclamide on channel activity at different voltages in diabetic rats. Representative recordings of channel currents in the absence or presence of 2.5 mM ATP (A)or 100 µM glibenclamide (B) to cis face. Channel activities were completely inhibited after the addition of ATP (n = 5), whereas channel activity was completely blocked at +20 but not -10 mV (n = 5). Closed levels are indicated by –.