Literature DB >> 24842076

Research participant-centered outcomes at NIH-supported clinical research centers.

Rhonda G Kost1, Laura N Lee, Jennifer L Yessis, Robert Wesley, Sandra Alfano, Steven R Alexander, Sylvia Baedorf Kassis, Philip Cola, Ann Dozier, Dan E Ford, Paul A Harris, Emmelyn Kim, Simon Craddock Lee, Gerri O'Riordan, Mary-Tara Roth, Kathryn Schuff, June Wasser, David K Henderson, Barry S Coller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although research participation is essential for clinical investigation, few quantitative outcome measures exist to assess participants' experiences. To address this, we developed and deployed a survey at 15 NIH-supported clinical research centers to assess participant-centered outcomes; we report responses from 4,961 participants.
METHODS: Survey questions addressed core aspects of the research participants' experience, including their overall rating, motivation, trust, and informed consent. We describe participant characteristics, responses to individual questions, and correlations among responses.
RESULTS: Respondents broadly represented the research population in sex, race, and ethnicity. Seventy-three percent awarded top ratings to their overall research experience and 94% reported no pressure to enroll. Top ratings correlated with feeling treated with respect, listened to, and having access to the research team (R(2) = 0.80-0.96). White participants trusted researchers more (88%) than did nonwhite participants collectively (80%; p < 0.0001). Many participants felt fully prepared by the informed consent process (67%) and wanted to receive research results (72%).
CONCLUSIONS: Our survey demonstrates that a majority of participants at NIH-supported clinical research centers rate their research experience very positively and that participant-centered outcome measures identify actionable items for improvement of participant's experiences, research protections, and the conduct of clinical investigation.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical trials; outcomes research; patient satisfaction; patient-centered outcomes research; translational research

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24842076      PMCID: PMC4237675          DOI: 10.1111/cts.12167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Sci        ISSN: 1752-8054            Impact factor:   4.689


  25 in total

1.  What patients say about medical research.

Authors:  Jeremy Sugarman; Nancy E Kass; Steven N Goodman; Patricia Perentesis; Praveen Fernandes; Ruth R Faden
Journal:  IRB       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug

2.  Development of a revised Health Care System Distrust scale.

Authors:  Judy A Shea; Ellyn Micco; Lorraine T Dean; Suzanne McMurphy; J Sanford Schwartz; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Attitudes towards clinical research amongst participants and nonparticipants.

Authors:  S M Madsen; M R Mirza; S Holm; K L Hilsted; K Kampmann; P Riis
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Assessing research participants' perceptions of their clinical research experiences.

Authors:  Rhonda G Kost; Laura M Lee; Jennifer Yessis; Barry S Coller; David K Henderson
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 4.689

5.  African Americans' views on research and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study.

Authors:  V S Freimuth; S C Quinn; S B Thomas; G Cole; E Zook; T Duncan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Research ethics. To protect human subjects, review what was done, not proposed.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Development of a research participants' perception survey to improve clinical research.

Authors:  Jennifer L Yessis; Rhonda G Kost; Laura M Lee; Barry S Coller; David K Henderson
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 4.689

8.  Return of genetic results in the familial dilated cardiomyopathy research project.

Authors:  Jill D Siegfried; Ana Morales; Jessica D Kushner; Emily Burkett; Jason Cowan; Ana Clara Mauro; Gordon S Huggins; Duanxiang Li; Nadine Norton; Ray E Hershberger
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Research subject advocacy: program implementation and evaluation at clinical and translational science award centers.

Authors:  Rhonda G Kost; Carson Reider; Julie Stephens; Kathryn G Schuff
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  Assessing participant-centered outcomes to improve clinical research.

Authors:  Rhonda G Kost; Laura M Lee; Jennifer Yessis; Robert A Wesley; David K Henderson; Barry S Coller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  7 in total

1.  Informed consent for next-generation nucleotide sequencing studies: Aiding communication between participants and investigators.

Authors:  Rhonda G Kost; Stephen M Poppel; Barry S Coller
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2017-02-07

2.  Participants' awareness of ethical compliance, safety and protection during participation in pharmaceutical industry clinical trials: a controlled survey.

Authors:  Gerardo González-Saldivar; René Rodríguez-Gutiérrez; Jose Luis Viramontes-Madrid; Alejandro Salcido-Montenegro; Neri Alejandro Álvarez-Villalobos; Victoria González-Nava; José Gerardo González-González
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 3.  Methodological approaches for conducting follow-up research with clinical trial participants: a scoping review and expert interviews.

Authors:  Aita Signorell; Jasmina Saric; Christian Appenzeller-Herzog; Hannah Ewald; Christian Burri; Martin Goetz; Jana Gerold
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Participants' perception of pharmaceutical clinical research: a cross-sectional controlled study.

Authors:  Gerardo González-Saldivar; René Rodríguez-Gutiérrez; José Luis Viramontes-Madrid; Alejandro Salcido-Montenegro; Kevin Erick Gabriel Carlos-Reyna; Andrés Marcelo Treviño-Alvarez; Neri Alejandro Álvarez-Villalobos; José Gerardo González-González
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.711

5.  Impact of survey length and compensation on validity, reliability, and sample characteristics for Ultrashort-, Short-, and Long-Research Participant Perception Surveys.

Authors:  Rhonda G Kost; Joel Correa de Rosa
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2018-07-06

6.  Satisfaction and perceptions of research participants in clinical and translational studies: An urban multi-institution with CTSA.

Authors:  Priscilla Adler; Jane Otado; John Kwagyan
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2020-03-06

7.  Delivery of the research participant perception survey through the patient portal.

Authors:  Issis J Kelly-Pumarol; Perrin Q Henderson; Julia T Rushing; Joseph E Andrews; Rhonda G Kost; Lynne E Wagenknecht
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2018-09-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.