Literature DB >> 24841409

Privacy protection for personal health information and shared care records.

Roderick L B Neame1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The protection of personal information privacy has become one of the most pressing security concerns for record keepers: this will become more onerous with the introduction of the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in mid-2014. Many institutions, both large and small, have yet to implement the essential infrastructure for data privacy protection and patient consent and control when accessing and sharing data; even more have failed to instil a privacy and security awareness mindset and culture amongst their staff. Increased regulation, together with better compliance monitoring, has led to the imposition of increasingly significant monetary penalties for failure to protect privacy: these too are set to become more onerous under the GDPR, increasing to a maximum of 2% of annual turnover.
OBJECTIVE: There is growing pressure in clinical environments to deliver shared patient care and to support this with integrated information. This demands that more information passes between institutions and care providers without breaching patient privacy or autonomy. This can be achieved with relatively minor enhancements of existing infrastructures and does not require extensive investment in inter-operating electronic records: indeed such investments to date have been shown not to materially improve data sharing. REQUIREMENTS FOR PRIVACY: There is an ethical duty as well as a legal obligation on the part of care providers (and record keepers) to keep patient information confidential and to share it only with the authorisation of the patient. To achieve this information storage and retrieval, communication systems must be appropriately configured. There are many components of this, which are discussed in this paper. Patients may consult clinicians anywhere and at any time: therefore, their data must be available for recipient-driven retrieval (i.e. like the World Wide Web) under patient control and kept private: a method for delivering this is outlined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24841409     DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v21i2.55

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inform Prim Care        ISSN: 1475-9985


  6 in total

1.  Locking it down: The privacy and security of mobile medication apps.

Authors:  Kelly Grindrod; Jonathan Boersema; Khrystine Waked; Vivian Smith; Jilan Yang; Catherine Gebotys
Journal:  Can Pharm J (Ott)       Date:  2016-12-06

2.  Assessment of Doctors' Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Confidentiality in Hospital Care.

Authors:  Cristina M Beltran-Aroca; Fernando Labella; Pilar Font-Ugalde; Eloy Girela-Lopez
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  GRANULAR PATIENT CONTROL OF PERSONAL HEALTH INFORMATION: FEDERAL AND STATE LAW CONSIDERATIONS.

Authors:  Michael J Saks; Adela Grando; Anita Murcko; Chase Millea
Journal:  Jurimetrics       Date:  2018

Review 4.  Effective surveillance systems for vector-borne diseases in urban settings and translation of the data into action: a scoping review.

Authors:  Florence Fournet; Frédéric Jourdain; Emmanuel Bonnet; Stéphanie Degroote; Valéry Ridde
Journal:  Infect Dis Poverty       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 4.520

5.  The anatomy of electronic patient record ethics: a framework to guide design, development, implementation, and use.

Authors:  Tim Jacquemard; Colin P Doherty; Mary B Fitzsimons
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Examination and diagnosis of electronic patient records and their associated ethics: a scoping literature review.

Authors:  Tim Jacquemard; Colin P Doherty; Mary B Fitzsimons
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 2.652

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.