Literature DB >> 24841351

A competing risk analysis of cancer-specific mortality of initial treatment with radical prostatectomy versus radiation therapy in clinically localized high-risk prostate cancer.

Joo Yong Lee1, Kang Su Cho, Jong Kyou Kwon, Seong Uk Jeh, Ho Won Kang, Richilda Red Diaz, Won Sik Ham, Woong Sub Koom, Ki Chang Keum, Young Deuk Choi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the optimal treatment for localized high-risk prostate cancer (PC), and much debate exists regarding the ideal treatment approach. For these reasons, we evaluated the competing risks of PC-specific mortality after initial therapy with radical prostatectomy (RP) versus radiotherapy (RT) in men with clinically localized high-risk PC.
METHODS: We reviewed patients treated with RP and RT combined with androgen-deprivation therapy between 1990 and 2009. High-risk PC is defined as clinical stage ≥T3a, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >20 ng/mL, or a biopsy Gleason sum of 8-10 according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Competing risk analysis was conducted to assess the association of RP (n = 251) or RT (n = 125) with cancer-specific mortality (CSM). Thereafter, secondary analysis with propensity score matching was conducted to further elucidate patient characteristics, with optimal matching of 0.25 times the standard deviation of propensity scores.
RESULTS: With an overall median follow-up of 76 months, 35 (9.3 %) men with high-risk PC died due to PC (23 in the RT group and 12 in the RP group). The 5-year estimates of cancer-specific survival rate for men treated with RP and RT were 96.5 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 94.2-98.9) and 88.3 % (95 % CI 82.8-94.3), respectively. Cumulative incidence estimates for CSM were statistically increased amongst men treated with RT (p = 0.002). Propensity score matching extracted 168 men with high-risk PC from the total patient cohort. Cumulative incidence estimates for CSM were statistically different amongst men treated with RT (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Initial treatment with RP versus RT was associated with a decreased risk of CSM in men with clinically localized high-risk PC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24841351     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3780-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  12 in total

1.  Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index is a significant prognostic factor for long-term survival of patients with high-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: a Bayesian model averaging approach.

Authors:  Joo Yong Lee; Ho Won Kang; Koon Ho Rha; Nam Hoon Cho; Young Deuk Choi; Sung Joon Hong; Kang Su Cho
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  An audit of referral and treatment patterns of high-risk prostate cancer patients in Alberta.

Authors:  Majed Alghamdi; Amandeep Taggar; Derek Tilley; Marc Kerba; Xanthoula Kostaras; Geoffrey Gotto; Michael Sia
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Current status of radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ho Won Kang; Joo Yong Lee; Jong Kyou Kwon; Seong Uk Jeh; Hae Do Jung; Young Deuk Choi
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2014-10-10

Review 4.  Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy: What Do Clinicians Have to Know?

Authors:  Ben G L Vanneste; Evert J Van Limbergen; Emile N van Lin; Joep G H van Roermund; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Cancer-specific mortality of high-risk prostate cancer after carbon-ion radiotherapy plus long-term androgen deprivation therapy.

Authors:  Goro Kasuya; Hitoshi Ishikawa; Hiroshi Tsuji; Yasuo Haruyama; Gen Kobashi; Daniel K Ebner; Koichiro Akakura; Hiroyoshi Suzuki; Tomohiko Ichikawa; Jun Shimazaki; Hirokazu Makishima; Takuma Nomiya; Tadashi Kamada; Hirohiko Tsujii
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 6.716

Review 6.  Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer treatments for patient-centered outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA Compliant).

Authors:  Ravishankar Jayadevappa; Sumedha Chhatre; Yu-Ning Wong; Marsha N Wittink; Ratna Cook; Knashawn H Morales; Neha Vapiwala; Diane K Newman; Thomas Guzzo; Alan J Wein; Stanley B Malkowicz; David I Lee; Jerome S Schwartz; Joseph J Gallo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 7.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the survival outcomes of first-line treatment options in high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jun H Lei; Liang R Liu; Qiang Wei; Shi B Yan; Tu R Song; Fu S Lin; Lu Yang; De H Cao; Hai C Yuan; Wen B Xue; Xiao Lv; Ying C Cai; Hao Zeng; Ping Han
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The role of radical prostatectomy and definitive external beam radiotherapy in combined treatment for high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xu Cheng; Zhi-Hui Wang; Mou Peng; Zhi-Chao Huang; Lu Yi; Yi-Jian Li; Lei Yi; Wen-Zhi Luo; Jia-Wen Chen; Yin-Huai Wang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Comparison of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy.

Authors:  Dong Soo Kim; Seung Hyun Jeon; Sung-Goo Chang; Sang Hyub Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-10-02

10.  Effect of Preoperative Risk Group Stratification on Oncologic Outcomes of Patients with Adverse Pathologic Findings at Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Won Sik Jang; Lawrence H C Kim; Cheol Yong Yoon; Koon Ho Rha; Young Deuk Choi; Sung Joon Hong; Won Sik Ham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.