Literature DB >> 24841263

Interaction between mutations and regulation of gene expression during development of de novo antibiotic resistance.

Nadine Händel1, Jasper M Schuurmans1, Yanfang Feng1, Stanley Brul1, Benno H ter Kuile2.   

Abstract

Bacteria can become resistant not only by horizontal gene transfer or other forms of exchange of genetic information but also by de novo by adaptation at the gene expression level and through DNA mutations. The interrelationship between changes in gene expression and DNA mutations during acquisition of resistance is not well documented. In addition, it is not known whether the DNA mutations leading to resistance always occur in the same order and whether the final result is always identical. The expression of >4,000 genes in Escherichia coli was compared upon adaptation to amoxicillin, tetracycline, and enrofloxacin. During adaptation, known resistance genes were sequenced for mutations that cause resistance. The order of mutations varied within two sets of strains adapted in parallel to amoxicillin and enrofloxacin, respectively, whereas the buildup of resistance was very similar. No specific mutations were related to the rather modest increase in tetracycline resistance. Ribosome-sensed induction and efflux pump activation initially protected the cell through induction of expression and allowed it to survive low levels of antibiotics. Subsequently, mutations were promoted by the stress-induced SOS response that stimulated modulation of genetic instability, and these mutations resulted in resistance to even higher antibiotic concentrations. The initial adaptation at the expression level enabled a subsequent trial and error search for the optimal mutations. The quantitative adjustment of cellular processes at different levels accelerated the acquisition of antibiotic resistance.
Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24841263      PMCID: PMC4135992          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02892-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  39 in total

1.  Analysis of the effects of -42 and -32 ampC promoter mutations in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli hyperproducing ampC.

Authors:  N Caroff; E Espaze; D Gautreau; H Richet; A Reynaud
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Parallel adaptive evolution cultures of Escherichia coli lead to convergent growth phenotypes with different gene expression states.

Authors:  Stephen S Fong; Andrew R Joyce; Bernhard Ø Palsson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Darwinian evolution can follow only very few mutational paths to fitter proteins.

Authors:  Daniel M Weinreich; Nigel F Delaney; Mark A Depristo; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Modes and modulations of antibiotic resistance gene expression.

Authors:  Florence Depardieu; Isabelle Podglajen; Roland Leclercq; Ekkehard Collatz; Patrice Courvalin
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Escherichia coli HdeB is an acid stress chaperone.

Authors:  Renée Kern; Abderrahim Malki; Jad Abdallah; Jihen Tagourti; Gilbert Richarme
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Antibiotic and ROS linkage questioned.

Authors:  Ferric C Fang
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Mechanisms of transcription activation exerted by GadX and GadW at the gadA and gadBC gene promoters of the glutamate-based acid resistance system in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Angela Tramonti; Michele De Canio; Isabel Delany; Vincenzo Scarlato; Daniela De Biase
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  ampC gene expression in promoter mutants of cefoxitin-resistant Escherichia coli clinical isolates.

Authors:  Dobryan M Tracz; David A Boyd; Romeo Hizon; Elizabeth Bryce; Allison McGeer; Marianna Ofner-Agostini; Andrew E Simor; Shirley Paton; Michael R Mulvey
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2007-02-26       Impact factor: 2.742

9.  A common mechanism of cellular death induced by bactericidal antibiotics.

Authors:  Michael A Kohanski; Daniel J Dwyer; Boris Hayete; Carolyn A Lawrence; James J Collins
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Quinolone-binding pocket of DNA gyrase: role of GyrB.

Authors:  Jonathan Heddle; Anthony Maxwell
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  14 in total

1.  Effects of Stress, Reactive Oxygen Species, and the SOS Response on De Novo Acquisition of Antibiotic Resistance in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Nadine Händel; Marloes Hoeksema; Marina Freijo Mata; Stanley Brul; Benno H ter Kuile
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  The European Union Summary Report on Antimicrobial Resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2018/2019.

Authors: 
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-04-12

3.  Dynamics of Mutations during Development of Resistance by Pseudomonas aeruginosa against Five Antibiotics.

Authors:  Yanfang Feng; Martijs J Jonker; Ioannis Moustakas; Stanley Brul; Benno H Ter Kuile
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Influence of Reactive Oxygen Species on De Novo Acquisition of Resistance to Bactericidal Antibiotics.

Authors:  Marloes Hoeksema; Stanley Brul; Benno H Ter Kuile
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Factors that affect transfer of the IncI1 β-lactam resistance plasmid pESBL-283 between E. coli strains.

Authors:  Nadine Händel; Sarah Otte; Martijs Jonker; Stanley Brul; Benno H ter Kuile
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Public health evolutionary biology of antimicrobial resistance: priorities for intervention.

Authors:  Fernando Baquero; Val F Lanza; Rafael Cantón; Teresa M Coque
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 5.183

7.  Development of Antibiotic Resistance during Simulated Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Chemostats.

Authors:  Yanfang Feng; Caspar J Hodiamont; Reinier M van Hest; Stanley Brul; Constance Schultsz; Benno H Ter Kuile
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Cellular Response to Ciprofloxacin in Low-Level Quinolone-Resistant Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Jesús Machuca; Esther Recacha; Alejandra Briales; Paula Díaz-de-Alba; Jesús Blazquez; Álvaro Pascual; José-Manuel Rodríguez-Martínez
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Comprehensive antibiotic-linked mutation assessment by resistance mutation sequencing (RM-seq).

Authors:  Romain Guérillot; Lucy Li; Sarah Baines; Brian Howden; Mark B Schultz; Torsten Seemann; Ian Monk; Sacha J Pidot; Wei Gao; Stefano Giulieri; Anders Gonçalves da Silva; Anthony D'Agata; Takehiro Tomita; Anton Y Peleg; Timothy P Stinear; Benjamin P Howden
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 11.117

10.  Stochastic Gene Expression Influences the Selection of Antibiotic Resistance Mutations.

Authors:  Lei Sun; Peter Ashcroft; Martin Ackermann; Sebastian Bonhoeffer
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.