Literature DB >> 24841023

Ten years experience with a novel modification of plastibell circumcision.

Ashraf Hammed1, Ahmed Abd Elgffar Helal, Refaat Badway, Samir Hammed Goda, Abdelaziz Yehya, Mohamed Abd Razik, Ahmed Elshamy, Omar Elsamahy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Plastibell device is a satisfactory method of circumcision in infants. However the most common post-operative complication was bleeding (especially from the frenulum site). As a result, we introduce a novel modification of the device to prevent this complication. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective comparative study of Plastibell circumcision in infants up to the age of 12 months was conducted, using conventional Plastibell device and modified Plastibell device circumcision. In The first group (1000 infants), circumcision was performed with conventional Plastibell device while in the second group (4500 infants), circumcision was done with modified Plastibell device.
RESULTS: The mean age was 8 weeks. The mean operating time were 8.5 min and 5.9 min for conventional Plastibell ring and modified Plastibell device circumcision respectively. The most common postoperative complication in first groups was bleeding.
CONCLUSION: This modified Plastibell device, prevents the most series complication of bleeding. It is fast and ensures excellent cosmoses compared with the standard Plastibell template circumcision. Also it is easy to perform and allows the paediatric surgeon to achieve consistently excellent cosmetic results. Moreover, the shorter operating time makes circumcision by the modified Plastibell device a more practical method. The technique will be described in detail.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24841023     DOI: 10.4103/0189-6725.132832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Afr J Paediatr Surg        ISSN: 0974-5998


  5 in total

1.  The study of the factors affecting the time of ring fall off in circumcision using Plastibell.

Authors:  Setareh Soltany; Arash Ardestanizadeh
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-06-30

2.  Plastibell circumcision: Comparison between neonates and infants.

Authors:  Osama A Bawazir; Wejdan Rubayyi S Alsaiari
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2020-10-15

Review 3.  Comparison of ring instruments and classic circumcision methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yavuz Güler; Gökhun Çağdaş Özmerdiven; Akif Erbin
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2022-05-23

4.  Plastibell circumcision of 2,276 male infants: a multi-centre study.

Authors:  Bioku Muftau Jimoh; Ikuerowo Stephen Odunayo; Igwilo Chinwe; Omisanjo Olufunmilade Akinfolarin; Adewumi Oluwafemi; Esho Julius Olusanmi
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2016-02-09

5.  Safety of the plastibell circumcision in neonates, infants, and older children.

Authors:  Sajid Razzaq; Muhammad Sajid Mehmood; Tufail Hussain Tahir; Tariq Masood; Salma Ghaffar
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.