Peter Martin1, Norene Kelly2, Boaz Kahana3, Eva Kahana4, Bradley J Willcox5, D Craig Willcox6, Leonard W Poon7. 1. Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Iowa State University, Ames. pxmartin@iastate.edu. 2. Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Iowa State University, Ames. 3. Department of Psychology, Cleveland State University, Ohio. 4. Department of Sociology, Case Western University, Cleveland, Ohio. 5. Department of Geriatric Medicine, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu. Kuakini Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii. 6. Department of Human Welfare, Okinawa International University, Ginowan. 7. Institute of Gerontology, University of Georgia, Athens.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Everyone wants to age successfully; however, the definition and criteria of successful aging remain vague for laypersons, researchers, and policymakers in spite of decades of research on the topic. This paper highlights work of scholars who made significant theoretical contributions to the topic. DESIGN AND METHODS: A thorough review and evaluation of the literature on successful aging was undertaken. RESULTS: Our review includes early gerontological definitions of successful aging and related concepts. Historical perspectives reach back to philosophical and religious texts, and more recent approaches have focused on both process- and outcome-oriented models of successful aging. We elaborate on Baltes and Baltes' theory of selective optimization with compensation [Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990a). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. B. Baltes & M. M. Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1-34). United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press], Kahana and Kahana's preventive and corrective proactivity model [Kahana, E., & Kahana, B. (1996). Conceptual and empirical advances in understanding aging well through proactive adaptation. In V. Bengtson (Ed.), Adulthood and aging: Research on continuities and discontinuities (pp. 18-40). New York: Springer], and Rowe and Kahn's model of successful aging [Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1998). Successful aging. New York: Pantheon Books], outlining their commonalities and differences. Additional views on successful aging emphasize subjective versus objective perceptions of successful aging and relate successful aging to studies on healthy and exceptional longevity. IMPLICATIONS: Additional theoretical work is needed to better understand successful aging, including the way it can encompass disability and death and dying. The extent of rapid social and technological change influencing views on successful aging also deserves more consideration.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Everyone wants to age successfully; however, the definition and criteria of successful aging remain vague for laypersons, researchers, and policymakers in spite of decades of research on the topic. This paper highlights work of scholars who made significant theoretical contributions to the topic. DESIGN AND METHODS: A thorough review and evaluation of the literature on successful aging was undertaken. RESULTS: Our review includes early gerontological definitions of successful aging and related concepts. Historical perspectives reach back to philosophical and religious texts, and more recent approaches have focused on both process- and outcome-oriented models of successful aging. We elaborate on Baltes and Baltes' theory of selective optimization with compensation [Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990a). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. B. Baltes & M. M. Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1-34). United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press], Kahana and Kahana's preventive and corrective proactivity model [Kahana, E., & Kahana, B. (1996). Conceptual and empirical advances in understanding aging well through proactive adaptation. In V. Bengtson (Ed.), Adulthood and aging: Research on continuities and discontinuities (pp. 18-40). New York: Springer], and Rowe and Kahn's model of successful aging [Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1998). Successful aging. New York: Pantheon Books], outlining their commonalities and differences. Additional views on successful aging emphasize subjective versus objective perceptions of successful aging and relate successful aging to studies on healthy and exceptional longevity. IMPLICATIONS: Additional theoretical work is needed to better understand successful aging, including the way it can encompass disability and death and dying. The extent of rapid social and technological change influencing views on successful aging also deserves more consideration.
Authors: Bradley J Willcox; Qimei He; Randi Chen; Katsuhiko Yano; Kamal H Masaki; John S Grove; Timothy A Donlon; D Craig Willcox; J David Curb Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-11-15 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jonathan Arnold; Jianliang Dai; Lusine Nahapetyan; Ankit Arte; Mary Ann Johnson; Dorothy Hausman; Willard L Rodgers; Robert Hensley; Peter Martin; Maurice Macdonald; Adam Davey; Ilene C Siegler; S Michal Jazwinski; Leonard W Poon Journal: Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res Date: 2010-09-14
Authors: Lourdes R Guerrero; Josephine A Menkin; Carmen A Carrillo; Carmen E Reyes; Laura Trejo; Cynthia Banks; Catherine A Sarkisian Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2019-10-19
Authors: J M A García-Lara; A P Navarrete-Reyes; R Medina-Méndez; S G Aguilar-Navarro; J A Avila-Funes Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.075