Literature DB >> 24840735

Pre-existing hypertension dominates γδT cell reduction in human ischemic stroke.

Mateusz G Adamski1, Yan Li2, Erin Wagner2, Hua Yu2, Chloe Seales-Bailey2, Helen Durkin3, Qing Hao2, Steven A Soper4, Michael Murphy5, Alison E Baird2.   

Abstract

T lymphocytes may play an important role in the evolution of ischemic stroke. Depletion of γδT cells has been found to abrogate ischemia reperfusion injury in murine stroke. However, the role of γδT cells in human ischemic stroke is unknown. We aimed to determine γδT cell counts and γδT cell interleukin 17A (IL-17A) production in the clinical setting of ischemic stroke. We also aimed to determine the associations of γδT cell counts with ischemic lesion volume, measures of clinical severity and with major stroke risk factors. Peripheral blood samples from 43 acute ischemic stroke patients and 26 control subjects matched on race and gender were used for flow cytometry and complete blood count analyses. Subsequently, cytokine levels and gene expression were measured in γδT cells. The number of circulating γδT cells was decreased by almost 50% (p = 0.005) in the stroke patients. γδT cell counts did not correlate with lesion volume on magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging or with clinical severity in the stroke patients, but γδT cells showed elevated levels of IL-17A (p = 0.048). Decreased γδT cell counts were also associated with older age (p = 0.004), pre-existing hypertension (p = 0.0005) and prevalent coronary artery disease (p = 0.03), with pre-existing hypertension being the most significant predictor of γδT cell counts in a multivariable analysis. γδT cells in human ischemic stroke are reduced in number and show elevated levels of IL-17A. A major reduction in γδT lymphocytes also occurs in hypertension and may contribute to the development of hypertension-mediated stroke and vascular disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24840735      PMCID: PMC4026520          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability in the United States [1]. The immune system is recognized as playing a major role in the evolution and pathophysiology of stroke and microvascular dysfunction, with a growing number of reports on the role of T lymphocytes [2]–[7]. γδT cells are a population of T lymphocytes that comprise between 0 and 7% of circulating CD3+ cells [8]. These cells express γδ T cell receptors (TCR), whereas the majority of T lymphocytes express αβTCR. γδT cells secrete interleukin-17 (IL-17) when stimulated by interleukin-23 (IL-23) and interferon gamma (INF-γ) when stimulated by interleukin-12 (IL-12) [9], [10]. As a bridge cell population γδT cells break the classical immune system paradigm by having features of both the adaptive (e.g., the antigen experienced response) and innate (i.e., the rapid response) immune responses. γδT cells that secrete IL-17 have been characterized as ligand-naive and γδT cells that secrete INF-γ have been characterized as ligand-experienced [9]. In a prior study depletion of γδT cells in mice ameliorated ischemia-reperfusion injury in the brain [11]. When analyzing the mechanistic basis of γδT cells in this model, Shichita et al. [11] identified important roles and interactions of IL-23 and IL-17 but not INF-γ. After ischemia reperfusion injury, increased macrophage IL-23 secretion commenced after day 1 and increased γδT cell IL-17 secretion commenced after day 3. In this same model, infarct size was reduced on day 1 in IL-23 knockout (KO) mice and on day 4 in IL-17 KO mice but was not altered in INF-γ KO mice. Intracellular cytokine staining confirmed that γδT cells were the main source of IL-17, CD4+ and γδTCR- T cells were the main sources of INF-γ. To date there is little data on the role of γδT cells in human stroke [12]. The mice in Shichita et al's study [11] were young and apparently free of vascular risk factors, while older age, a major risk factor for stroke, has been associated with reduced γδT cell counts [13], [14]. Furthermore, hypertension and coronary artery disease, other major stroke risk factors, have been associated with alterations in IL-17 and IFN-γ [15]–[18]. Therefore, our objectives were to determine γδT cell counts and function in the clinical setting of ischemic stroke and the associations of γδT cell counts with lesion volume, measures of clinical severity and with major stroke risk factors. We have investigated whether circulating γδT cell counts are 1) altered in patients presenting with acute ischemic human stroke, and 2) correlate with: lesion volume on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW MRI), and with clinical severity and demographic and risk factors. Next we examined γδT cell levels of IL-17A and INF-γ and the cellular gene expression of interleukin-23 receptor (IL-23R) and interleukin-23 subunit alpha (IL-23A).

Methods

Approval was obtained from the SUNY Downstate Medical Center Institutional Review Board for this prospective observational study. All patients and/or authorized representatives gave full and signed informed consent.

Study Subjects

The peripheral blood samples of 69 subjects were used: 43 acute stroke patients admitted to the University Hospital of Brooklyn at SUNY Downstate Medical Center and at Long Island College Hospital, and 26 gender and race matched healthy control subjects recruited from the local community. The clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients and controls are shown in Table 1. The age range of the subjects was 30–95 years. The median time of blood draw was 36±29 hours post stroke. Stroke was diagnosed according to World Health Organization stroke criteria.
Table 1

Clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients and controls.

FactorAll (n = 69)Stroke (n = 43)Control (n = 26)p
Age63.0 (52.0, 71.0)70.0 (60.0, 73.0)55.5 (50.2,61.0)0.0002
Gender– male28 (40)18 (42)10 (38)0.9
Race– black63 (91)43 (93)23 (88)0.8
Risk factors
Hypertension54 (78)41 (95)13 (50)<0.0001
Diabetes24 (35)16 (37)8 (31)0.8
Coronary artery disease17 (25)13 (30)4 (15)0.3
Smoking history33 (48)11 (25)22 (85)<0.0001
Atrial fibrillation6 (9)6 (14)0 (0)0.12
Hyperlipidemia29 (42)19 (44)10 (38)0.8
Medications
Diuretics13 (20)11 (27)2 (8)0.10
ACEIs/ARBs20 (30)18 (45)2 (8)0.003
Beta blockers29 (44)22 (55)7 (27)0.046
Calcium channel blockers18 (27)14 (35)4 (15)0.14
Antithrombotics28 (42)20 (50)8 (31)0.2
Statins24 (36)16 (40)8 (31)0.6
Stroke-Related
Infarct volume (mm3)N/A2,367.3 (1,028.4, 14,491.5)N/AN/A
NIHSS scoreN/A5.0 (3.0, 9.0)N/AN/A
Barthel score at 3–6 monthsN/A95.0 (87.5, 100)N/AN/A

Results are median (interquartile range) for continuous factors and numbers (%) for categorical factors. ACEI – angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, ARB - angiotensin receptor blocker, N/A – not applicable, NIHSS – National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare the ages between the stroke patients and the control subjects. Chi–square and Fishers' exact tests were used to compare the remaining demographic, risk factors and medications between the stroke patients and the control subjects.

Results are median (interquartile range) for continuous factors and numbers (%) for categorical factors. ACEI – angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, ARB - angiotensin receptor blocker, N/A – not applicable, NIHSS – National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare the ages between the stroke patients and the control subjects. Chi–square and Fishers' exact tests were used to compare the remaining demographic, risk factors and medications between the stroke patients and the control subjects. The study inclusion criteria were: over 18 years of age and acute ischemic stroke. The exclusion criteria were: current immunological diseases, taking steroid or immunosuppressive therapies, severe allergies, acute infection and severe anemia. The following clinical data were recorded: age, gender, race, self–reported risk factors, medications at the time of stroke onset (based on 40 subjects) or, in the control subjects, medications at the time of blood draw, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score in the stroke subjects and complete blood counts (CBC), including total white blood cell count and white cell differential counts. Hypertension was defined as a prior (at any time in the past) diagnosis of hypertension by the subject's physician or currently receiving treatment for hypertension. Diabetes was defined as a past medical history of known diabetes mellitus. Coronary artery disease was defined as a physician-diagnosed past history of ischemic heart disease or angina. Hyperlipidemia was defined as a past history of documented elevation in total cholesterol (>200 mg/dl). Smoking was defined as current or prior smoking. Atrial fibrillation was defined as a past or current history of physician-diagnosed atrial fibrillation. In the stroke patients lesion volumes were independently measured by two observers with neuroimaging expertise who were blinded to the clinical and laboratory data. Ischemic lesion volumes were measured on magnetic resonance imaging diffusion weighted images using Medical Image Processing Analysis and Visualization software. Neurological severity was based on the admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score. Follow–up assessment used the Barthel scores at 3 to 6 months (based on 33 patients) that provides a measure of the amount of stroke recovery and disability.

Flow Cytometry

Peripheral blood from the study participants was drawn to BD Vacutainer tubes containing ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA). Within an hour from blood collection 100 µl of blood was stained in the dark for 30 minutes in room temperature with four monoclonal antibodies (Ab) to CD3, CD4, CD8 and γδTCR (Table 2). Following staining, erythrocytes were lysed and leukocytes were fixed according to manufacturer No–Wash Lysis Procedure (Cal–Lyse solution Invitrogen). Counting beads (AccuCheck Counting Beads Invitrogen) were added, following manufacturer protocol, to obtain absolute cell counts (gating strategy presented in the Figure 1). Data were collected on the Epics XL flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter). Three populations of T lymphocytes were analyzed: CD8+, CD4+ and γδTCR+. T lymphocytes were defined as CD3+ cells within the lymphocyte gate. The lymphocyte gate was set based on side scatter characteristics. Gating strategy was set to include CD3+ cells regardless of size, not to exclude activated (larger) and apoptotic (smaller) lymphocytes (Figure 1). Based on forward scatter (FSC) values, size of CD3+ lymphocytes was not different from the size of γδT cells (mean ±standard deviation, respectively: 182±14 and 187±16; p>0.05) as presented on FCS vs. γδTCR+ plot (Figure 1). γδT cells size did not differ between stroke and control (mean ±standard deviation, respectively: 188±17 and 184±14; p>0.05). 200,000 events were acquired for each sample. Raw data were compensated, analyzed and presented using FlowJo software version 9.2 for Mac (Tree Star, San Carlos, California). Ab were titrated to achieve optimal resolution and gates for CD8+, CD4+ and γδTCR+ T lymphocytes were set using fluorescence minus one (FMO) method [19].
Table 2

Monoclonal antibodies.

TargetAntibody cloneFluorophoreVolume usedCatalogue numberManufacturer
CD3S4.1PE–Texas Red0.5 µlMHCD0317Invitrogen
CD4RPA-T4FITC2 µl555346BD Biosciences
γδTCR11F2PE2 µl340887Becton Dickinson
CD8HIT8aPE–Cy52 µl555636BD Pharmingen
Figure 1

Gating strategy to identify T cell subsets (CD4+, CD8+ and γδTCR+) and counting beads based on a representative sample.

(a) Gating strategy to identify T cell subsets. T lymphocytes were selected based on CD3 expression and side scatter (SSC) characteristics. The CD3+ population was further divided into CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes (based on CD4 and CD8 expression) and γδT positive and negative CD3 cells (based on γδTCR expression). (b) Gating strategy to identify counting beads. First, two populations of counting beads were selected based on the forward and side scatter characteristics. Second, FITC positive beads were counted for the cell count analyses. Third, the frequency of each bead population was assessed to compare with bead lot characteristics.

Gating strategy to identify T cell subsets (CD4+, CD8+ and γδTCR+) and counting beads based on a representative sample.

(a) Gating strategy to identify T cell subsets. T lymphocytes were selected based on CD3 expression and side scatter (SSC) characteristics. The CD3+ population was further divided into CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes (based on CD4 and CD8 expression) and γδT positive and negative CD3 cells (based on γδTCR expression). (b) Gating strategy to identify counting beads. First, two populations of counting beads were selected based on the forward and side scatter characteristics. Second, FITC positive beads were counted for the cell count analyses. Third, the frequency of each bead population was assessed to compare with bead lot characteristics.

Cytokine Levels and Gene Expression in γδT cells

γδT cells were extracted from 35 study subjects (17 stroke, 18 control). A detailed protocol for γδT cell sorting has been published previously [20]. Briefly, γδT cells were extracted from whole blood using magnetic bead separation (Miltenyi Biotec) – γδT cell purity was over 80%. RNA and proteins were extracted using column separation (Norgen). Quality and concentration of RNA and protein was measured using Qubit 1.0 Fluorometer (Invitrogen). Protein concentration was measured in 28 study subjects (10 stroke, 18 controls). The concentration of IL-17A and INF-γ in proteins extracted from γδT cell was determined by flow cytometry using BD cytometric bead array. Samples processing was performed according to the manufacturers instructions (BD Bioscience) using Human IL-17A Flex Set and Human IFN-γ Flex Set. Results were analyzed using FCAP Array version 3 software (BD Bioscience). Gene expression was measured in 29 study subjects (17 stroke, 12 control). RNA reverse transcription PCR was based on random hexamers (Life Technologies). The primers were designed using NCBI/Primer-Blast (Primer3 and BLAST), and wet tested. High throughput real time PCR run on BioMark HD system (Fluidigm) was used to measure gene expression of IL-23R and IL-23A genes. To compare gene expression between samples relative analytic approach was used. The relative analysis was based on the cell count input for each sample and was normalized to commercial cDNA (Universal cDNA Reverse Transcribed by Random Hexamer: Human Normal Tissues; Biochain, Newark, CA). Subjects selected for cytokine expression and gene expression were representative for the entire group used for cell phenotyping.

Statistical Analyses

The data were analyzed using R version 2.15.2 [21]. Non–parametric and parametric tests, as appropriate, were used to compare demographic and laboratory values between the stroke and control subjects (Wilcoxon rank sum and Student's t, tests).Spearman correlation coefficients were used for correlational analyses. Chi–square and Fishers' exact tests were used to compare grouped data. The hierarchical cluster analysis used Ward's method and log transformed and normalized cell count data. A factorial analysis of variance (section 4 of the Results) was used to evaluate for potential interactions in the associations of stroke and hypertension on γδT cell subset counts. Levene's tests confirmed homogeneity of the variances of the independent factors. A linear regression analysis was performed to adjust for baseline differences between patients and controls and to control for major potential confounders in the associations of hypertension and stroke with γδT cell counts. Measurements of the global validation statistic, skewness, kurtosis, link function and heteroscedasticity confirmed that all model assumptions were met. The γδT cell count data were log transformed for this analysis. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

1. Reduction of γδT cell numbers in human ischemic stroke

The absolute number of circulating γδT cells was reduced in the stroke subjects relative to the controls, by almost 50% (p = 0.005, ). In the stroke patients the median γδT cell count was 79.4 cells/µl while in the control subjects the median number of γδT cells was 137.0 cells/µl. γδT cells accounted for a median of 1.92% (range 0.28–22.9%) of CD3+ lymphocytes.
Table 3

Leukocyte subset cellular counts in stroke and control subjects.

All (n = 69)Stroke (n = 43)Control (n = 26)p
γδ+T (cells/µl)98.6 (52.8, 197.0)79.4 (45.7, 163.0)137.0 (85.4, 254.5)0.005
CD4+T (cells/µl)3972.0 (2471.0, 5252.03903.0 (2641.0, 4835.0)4346.5 (2430.5, 6862.0)0.14
CD8+T (cells/µl)1463.0 (950.0, 2094.0)1343.0 (876.5, 1799.0)1737.5 (993.7, 2487.7)0.08
Neutrophils (109/ml)3.6 (2.8, 4.3)3.7 (3.1, 4.8)2.9 (2.4, 4.0)0.045
Monocytes (109/ml)0.4 (0.3, 0.5)0.4 (0.3, 0.5)0.4 (0.3, 0.5)0.99
Lymphocytes (109/ml)1.7 (1.3, 2.0)1.6 (1.0, 1.9)1.9 (1.5, 2.2)0.026
Total WBC (109/ml)5.8 (4.8,7.3)5.8 (5.2, 7.4)5.5 (4.3, 6.8)0.3

Values are median (interquartile range). γδ+T, CD4+T and CD8+T count was measured with flow cytometry; Neutrophil, Monocyte, Lymphocyte and Total WBC was measured with complete blood count; WBC – white blood cell. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare leukocyte cellular counts between the stroke patients and the control subjects.

Values are median (interquartile range). γδ+T, CD4+T and CD8+T count was measured with flow cytometry; Neutrophil, Monocyte, Lymphocyte and Total WBC was measured with complete blood count; WBC – white blood cell. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare leukocyte cellular counts between the stroke patients and the control subjects. γδT cells were disproportionately altered relative to the five other leukocyte subsets studied ( ). Mild increases in neutrophils (p = 0.045) and decreases in the total number of lymphocytes (p = 0.03) were present in the ischemic stroke patients, while CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were non-significantly reduced ( ) and monocyte counts were unaltered (p = 0.99, ).
Figure 2

γδT cells were differentially altered in this clinical cohort relative to 5 other leukocyte subsets.

This heatmap illustrates the normalized cell counts for 6 leukocyte cell subsets (columns) in the study subjects (rows). Cell numbers for neutrophils, monocytes and total lymphocytes were determined from the complete blood count, and cell numbers for CD4+, CD8+ and γδ+ T lymphocytes were measured using flow cytometry. The column dendrogram reveals clustering by leukocyte subset, demonstrating that the γδT cell subset formed a separate and dominant cluster from the other five leukocyte subsets. The γδT cell cluster separates into decreased and increased cellular counts, with decreased cellular counts predominating in the stroke subjects. This hierarchical cluster analysis used Ward's method and log-transformed and normalized cell count data.

γδT cells were differentially altered in this clinical cohort relative to 5 other leukocyte subsets.

This heatmap illustrates the normalized cell counts for 6 leukocyte cell subsets (columns) in the study subjects (rows). Cell numbers for neutrophils, monocytes and total lymphocytes were determined from the complete blood count, and cell numbers for CD4+, CD8+ and γδ+ T lymphocytes were measured using flow cytometry. The column dendrogram reveals clustering by leukocyte subset, demonstrating that the γδT cell subset formed a separate and dominant cluster from the other five leukocyte subsets. The γδT cell cluster separates into decreased and increased cellular counts, with decreased cellular counts predominating in the stroke subjects. This hierarchical cluster analysis used Ward's method and log-transformed and normalized cell count data.

2. γδT cell numbers did not correlate with lesion volume or clinical severity

There was no association of γδT cell count with ischemic lesion volume on DW MRI (coefficient  = −0.03, p = 0.9). There was also no association of γδT cell number with stroke severity as measured by the NIHSS (coefficient  = −012, p = 0.4) or with outcome (coefficient  = 0.02, p = 0.9).

3. Correlation of γδT cell numbers with demographic and risk factors

γδT cell numbers were decreased in individuals over age 60 years (p = 0.004) and in individuals with a prior history of coronary artery disease (p = 0.03). There was no association of γδT cell count with race or gender ( ). There was a substantial decrease in γδT cell counts in individuals with pre-existing hypertension. γδT cell counts were reduced by over 60% in hypertensive subjects (80.6 cells/µl) relative to normotensive subjects (217.0 cells/µl, p = 0.0005, ). γδT cell counts were reduced in patients taking antithrombotics (p = 0.03) or β-blockers (p = 0.02) but not altered in patients taking angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB), diuretics or calcium channel blockers.
Table 4

Associations of γδT cell counts with demographic and risk factors for all study subjects (n = 69).

γδT Cell Counts (cells/µl)
Factor PresentFactor Absentp
Demographic Factors
Age≥60 years72.5 (29.8, 171.7)130.0 (94.1, 238.0)0.004
Gender - male96.0 (59.0, 159.7)102.0 (50.3, 199.0)0.8
Race - black102.0 (52.8, 193.5)77.9 (53.4, 171.7)0.8
Risk Factors
Hypertension80.6 (49.8, 148.5)217.0 (126.5, 293.0)0.0005
Diabetes90.7 (55.6, 195.2)98.6 (58.2, 197.0)0.97
Coronary artery disease59.9 (27.6, 141.0)109.5 (64.8, 211.0)0.03
Smoking history120 (69.2, 209.0)87.5 (42.2, 171.7)0.08
Atrial fibrillation90.2 (55.1, 172.4)102.0 (52.8, 193.5)0.7
Hyperlipidemia102.0 (56.5, 171.0)97.3 (50.1, 222.2)0.9
Medications
Diuretics102.0 (69.2, 182.0)96.1 (50.7, 199.0)0.73
ACEIs/ARBs87.5 (49.8, 169.2)109.5 (55.8, 217.2)0.34
Beta blockers72.7 (29.3, 157.5)130.0 (73.5, 228.0)0.02
Calcium channel blockers72.5 (51.5, 176.2)105.0 (52.4, 211.2)0.32
Antithrombotics72.5 (46.0, 141.0)125.0 (70.1, 233.0)0.03
Statins97.6 (65.0, 176.0)102.0 (47.0, 215.0)0.81

Values are median (interquartile range). Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare γδT cellular counts with demographics, risk factors and medication usage.

Values are median (interquartile range). Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare γδT cellular counts with demographics, risk factors and medication usage. To further explore this finding, the cellular counts of the other T cell subsets were compared between subjects with and without hypertension. The CD8+ subset (p = 0.01) was moderately reduced in individuals with hypertension while there was no significant difference in CD4+ subset numbers in the subjects with hypertension ( ). γδT cell numbers were compared between the hypertensive and normotensive controls where substantial reductions were found- 81.8 cells/µl in hypertensive control subjects compared to 238.0 cells/µl in the normotensive control subjects (p = 0.0006, ). This was not explained by age differences, as the median age was not significantly different between the control subjects with and without hypertension (58.0 vs. 52.0 years, respectively). CD8+ T cells were non–significantly decreased in hypertensive control subjects relative to normotensive controls ( ).
Table 5

T cell numbers in subjects with and without pre-existing hypertension.

SubjectsγδT (cells/µl)CD4 (cells/µl)CD8 (cells/µl)
All Subjects
Normotension (n = 15)217.0 (126.5, 293.0)4394.0 (2495.0, 7399.0)2168.0 (1503.0, 3564.5)
Hypertension (n = 54)80.6 (49.8, 148.5)3885.5 (2458.7, 4865.7)1238.5 (868.2, 1765.2)
p0.00050.140.008
Control Subjects
Normotension (n = 13)238.0 (199.0, 316.0)5427.0 (2471.0, 7682.0)2168.0 (1657.0, 4064.0)
Hypertension (n = 13)81.8 (59.9, 111.0)3778.0 (2417.0, 5524.0)1230.0 (950.0, 1754.0)
p0.00060.50.1
Stroke Subjects
Normotension (n = 2)73.1 (61.7, 84.6)3680.5 (3534.8, 3826.2)2207.0 (1778.0, 2636.0)
Hypertension (n = 41)79.4 (45.3, 171.0)3903.0 (2588.0, 4856.0)1247.0 (860.0, 1769.0)
p0.80.90.27

Values are median (interquartile range). Wilcoxon rank sum test were used for the comparisons in T cell numbers between the subject groups.

Values are median (interquartile range). Wilcoxon rank sum test were used for the comparisons in T cell numbers between the subject groups.

4. Relative contributions of hypertension and stroke on γδT cell counts

In a factorial analysis of variance hypertension was the major determinant of γδT cellular counts (F value = 12.8; p = 0.0006). Stroke and hypertension:stroke interaction were not significant (respectively, F value = 1.54; p = 0.22 and F value = 2.1; p = 0.15). In linear regression analysis, adjusting for age, race and gender, pre–existing hypertension was also the most significant predictor of γδT cell counts (p = 0.008, ). The estimated effect size of hypertension from the model was 2.77, indicating that hypertension is associated with a 64% reduction in γδT cell counts ( ). Coronary artery disease had no effect when entered into the model, nor did smoking history or beta-blocker or antithrombotic therapy.
Table 6

Linear regression model for γδT cell count.

FactorEstimate95% CIT valuep
Age−0.005−0.04, 0.03−0.020.80
Gender– male0.12−0.34, 0.580.530.60
Race– white−0.04−0.86, 0.77−0.110.91
No hypertension1.030.28, 1.782.730.008
Stroke1.44−1.08, 3.971.140.26
Hypertension:stroke interaction−1.28−2.87, 0.29−1.620.11
Stroke:age interaction−0.02−0.06, 0.02−1.130.26

Linear regression modeling was used to determine the relative impacts of hypertension and stroke on γδT cell counts and to adjust for clinical and demographic factors and potential interactions (for age, race and gender). This revealed that pre–existing hypertension was the significant predictor in the model accounting for γδT cell counts. Coronary artery disease had no effect when entered into the model, nor did smoking history, beta-blocker treatment, or antithrombotic treatment. CI– confidence intervals.

Linear regression modeling was used to determine the relative impacts of hypertension and stroke on γδT cell counts and to adjust for clinical and demographic factors and potential interactions (for age, race and gender). This revealed that pre–existing hypertension was the significant predictor in the model accounting for γδT cell counts. Coronary artery disease had no effect when entered into the model, nor did smoking history, beta-blocker treatment, or antithrombotic treatment. CI– confidence intervals.

5. Cytokine levels and gene expression in γδT cells

In γδT cells there were increased levels of IL-17A in the stroke patients relative to the controls (p = 0.048) with a similar trend in IL-17A/IFN-γ ratio (p = 0.1) and with no alterations in IFN-γ levels ( ). There was a 3.3 fold non significant increase in IL-23R gene expression in γδT cells in the stroke patients (p>0.05) with a 1.1 fold non significant decrease in IL-23A gene expression (p>0.05). γδT cellular cytokine levels and gene expression were not significantly different between individuals with and without hypertension, with and without CAD and those over age 60 years relative to those less than age 60 years.
Table 7

γδT cellular cytokine levels (n = 28).

StrokeControlp
IL-17A (ng/µl)*7.01±2.34.78±3.10.048
IFN-γ (ng/µl)2.4 (0.72, 3.58)3.31 (1.43, 4.07)0.4
IL-17A/IFN-γ ratio3.3 (1.7, 6.2)1.5 (0.9, 2.4)0.1

Results are median (IQR) or mean* ± SD, as appropriate. Wilcoxon rank sum and Student's t tests, as appropriate, were used for the between group comparisons.

Results are median (IQR) or mean* ± SD, as appropriate. Wilcoxon rank sum and Student's t tests, as appropriate, were used for the between group comparisons.

Discussion

In this study we found that γδT cell numbers were reduced in human ischemic stroke and that γδT cells showed elevated IL-17A secretion. Reductions in γδT lymphocytes were also associated with hypertension, older age and, to a lesser degree, with prevalent coronary artery disease. Hypertension was associated with γδT cell count reductions of almost 65%. To the best of our knowledge this is the first clinical study showing the potential roles of γδT lymphocytes in stroke, hypertension and hypertension-mediated stroke. In this study, the increase in IL-17A but not in INF-γ levels in the γδT cells of the stroke patients suggests activation of the IL-23 and IL-17 cytokine expression pathway. This is in line with previous reports by Shichita et al. from a murine stroke model and by Li et al. from human ischemic brain tissues [11], [22]. This increase in IL-17 expression from antigen-naive γδT cells may reflect a non-specific/antigen naive immune response to stroke [9], [10], [23]. Contrary to this murine study of Shichita et al. where γδT cell depletion ameliorated ischemia-reperfusion injury [11] we did not find associations of γδT cell counts with lesion volume, stroke severity and outcome. However, associations with lesion size and outcome and severity might be found in a larger patient sample. Changes in leukocyte numbers, as reflected by elevated neutrophil counts and reductions in lymphocyte counts are common in acute stroke and reflect the phenomenon of adrenergic mediated stroke-induced immunodepression [24]. In stroke, activation of the sympathetic nervous system causes shrinkage of the spleen due to the release of residual cells [25]–[27] and is essential to the release of hepatic invariant NKT cells [6]. Blockade of the sympathetic nervous system has been shown to modulate circulating regulatory T cell numbers [28] and to change the activity of CD8+ and CD4+ T cells [29]. Stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system by acute stress has also been associated with increased numbers of circulating T cells expressing receptors for chemokines secreted by activated endothelial cells [30]. The reductions in γδT cells seen in this study may indicate that this is one of the populations of T lymphocytes that are regulated by the stress induced sympathetic response [6], [30]. Although, we did not specifically study the role of sympathetic activation in this study, we note that patients treated with β-blockers had significantly decreased numbers of circulating γδT cells. The reductions of γδT cellular numbers in the stroke patients were disproportionately larger than reductions in the other lymphocyte subsets. Our results show that older age, hypertension and coronary artery disease were also associated with γδT cellular counts, with hypertension dominating γδT cell reductions. Older age has previously been reported to be associated with altered γδT cell counts [13], [14]. In CAD, no alterations in γδT cell counts have been reported to date, but decreases in CD3+ lymphocytes and increases of IFN–γ secreting CD8+CD56+ T lymphocytes and of CD28CD4+ T lymphocytes - also a significant source of IFN–γ - have been reported [15]–[17]. Coronary artery infiltrating T lymphocytes producing IL–17 and IFN–γ [18] have been described. Given that γδT cells are a major source of both IL-17 and IFN–γ, our finding of decreased numbers of γδT cells in CAD is deserving of further study. Hence, while the stroke patients and control subjects were matched on race and gender the subjects were not matched on age and hypertension status, which were associated with γδT cell counts. Given this finding, and given that most stroke patients are hypertensive, in order to fully and further explore the decrease in the gamma delta T cell counts in stroke patients stroke patients should be matched with controls based on their hypertension score. Hypertension was overall the strongest determinant of γδT cell counts. Hypertension was the factor that was most strongly associated with γδT cell counts and was the most significant predictor in factorial and linear regression analyses. Markedly reduced cellular counts were also seen in the hypertensive control subjects, relative to the normotensive control subjects. Hypertension is by far the most significant, modifiable risk factor for both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke [31]–[33]. The high prevalence of hypertension in our non–Hispanic Black Caribbean stroke population is typical of many stroke cohorts. Hypertension has classically been considered a disorder of the renin angiotensin system or of the brain. Recently in rodent studies it has been demonstrated that T lymphocytes are required for the full development of angiotensin II induced hypertension [34]. T lymphocytes were found to infiltrate the adventitia and peri-adventitial fat of vessels [34] and T cells secreting IL–17 have been found in the vessel walls of hypertensive animals [34]–[36], potentially due to induction of hypertension-induced expression of homing receptors [35]. Furthermore, plasma and tissue levels of IL–17 and IFN–γ have been independently related with the development of hypertension, but the cellular sources were not identified [36]. As γδT cells secrete and are key sources of IL–17 and IFN–γ in the blood and IL–17 in the brain [4], [8], [37], the decrease in the number of circulating γδT cells in our study may be due to their active role in the evolution of hypertension and possible mobilization into vascular walls or their removal from the circulation. As the number of γδT cells distinguished the already diagnosed hypertensive subjects from non–hypertensive subjects, regardless of the medications being taken, as yet unrecognized pathophysiological mechanisms may be involved- other than targeted by current antihypertensive agents [38]. The implications of our results are that we have recognized two T lymphocyte subsets – the γδT and the CD8 subsets - that may be involved in human hypertension [39], with γδT cells possibly linking hypertension to stroke. γδT cells were identified for the first time as a potential marker of stroke risk in hypertensive individuals or of vascular disease burden. Alterations in CD8+ T lymphocytes support a recent finding where subsets of these cells were found to contribute to human hypertension [40]. The importance of these findings are highlighted by the fact that hypertension is the most common vascular disease worldwide with 5–30% of individuals remaining resistant to available treatments [31]. Hypertension–related morbidity comes largely from its downstream vascular consequences that include atherosclerotic vascular disease, heart disease and stroke, with stroke being the preeminent complication. Elucidating as yet unrecognized mechanisms of both hypertension and stroke could give new perspectives to the understanding of these diseases and possibly lead to novel treatments. Furthermore, this study demonstrates the importance of incorporating vascular risk factors in stroke translational research studies.
  39 in total

1.  Role of T lymphocytes and interferon-gamma in ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Gokhan Yilmaz; Thiruma V Arumugam; Karen Y Stokes; D Neil Granger
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Interpreting flow cytometry data: a guide for the perplexed.

Authors:  Leonore A Herzenberg; James Tung; Wayne A Moore; Leonard A Herzenberg; David R Parks
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 25.606

3.  Splenic measurements in ischemic stroke: assessment of baseline size.

Authors:  Hua Yu; Mateusz G Adamski; Erin Wagner; Chloe Seales-Bailey; Alison E Baird
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.266

4.  Expression of interleukin-17 in ischemic brain tissue.

Authors:  G-Z Li; D Zhong; L-M Yang; B Sun; Z-H Zhong; Y-H Yin; J Cheng; B-B Yan; H-L Li
Journal:  Scand J Immunol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.487

5.  Resident Vdelta1+ gammadelta T cells control early infiltration of neutrophils after Escherichia coli infection via IL-17 production.

Authors:  Kensuke Shibata; Hisakata Yamada; Hiromitsu Hara; Kenji Kishihara; Yasunobu Yoshikai
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2007-04-01       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Hypertension promotes integrin expression and reactive oxygen species generation by circulating leukocytes.

Authors:  Choong H Kim; Nosratola D Vaziri
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 7.  Stroke-induced immunodepression: experimental evidence and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Ulrich Dirnagl; Juliane Klehmet; Johann S Braun; Hendrik Harms; Christian Meisel; Tjalf Ziemssen; Konstantin Prass; Andreas Meisel
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Broadly altered gene expression in blood leukocytes in essential hypertension is absent during treatment.

Authors:  Helena Chon; Carlo A J M Gaillard; Brenda B van der Meijden; Hilde M Dijstelbloem; Rob J Kraaijenhagen; Dik van Leenen; Frank C P Holstege; Jaap A Joles; Hans A R Bluyssen; Hein A Koomans; Branko Braam
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2004-03-08       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies.

Authors:  Sarah Lewington; Robert Clarke; Nawab Qizilbash; Richard Peto; Rory Collins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-12-14       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Systolic blood pressure, diabetes and the risk of cardiovascular diseases in the Asia-Pacific region.

Authors:  A P Kengne; A Patel; F Barzi; K Jamrozik; T H Lam; H Ueshima; D F Gu; I Suh; M Woodward
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.844

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  IL-17+ γδ T cells as kick-starters of inflammation.

Authors:  Pedro H Papotto; Julie C Ribot; Bruno Silva-Santos
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 25.606

Review 2.  Inflammatory Disequilibrium in Stroke.

Authors:  Danica Petrovic-Djergovic; Sascha N Goonewardena; David J Pinsky
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 17.367

3.  First translational 'Think Tank' on cerebrovascular disease, cognitive impairment and dementia.

Authors:  Frank C Barone; Deborah Gustafson; Howard A Crystal; Herman Moreno; Mateusz G Adamski; Ken Arai; Alison E Baird; Clotilde Balucani; Adam M Brickman; David Cechetto; Philip Gorelick; Geert Jan Biessels; Amanda Kiliaan; Lenore Launer; Julie Schneider; Farzaneh A Sorond; Rachel Whitmer; Clinton Wright; Zheng Gang Zhang
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 4.  γδ T Cell in Cerebral Ischemic Stroke: Characteristic, Immunity-Inflammatory Role, and Therapy.

Authors:  Li Wang; Chengye Yao; Jiayi Chen; Yangyang Ge; Chenchen Wang; Yu Wang; Fuquan Wang; Yan Sun; Maosha Dai; Yun Lin; Shanglong Yao
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.003

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.