Literature DB >> 24840597

Reduction in late-stage breast cancer incidence in the mammography era: Implications for overdiagnosis of invasive cancer.

Mark A Helvie1, Joanne T Chang, R Edward Hendrick, Mousumi Banerjee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mammographic screening is expected to decrease the incidence of late-stage breast cancer. In the current study, the authors determined the decrease in late-stage cancer incidence and the changes in invasive cancer incidence that occurred in the mammographic era after adjusting for prescreening temporal trends.
METHODS: Breast cancer incidence and stage data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. The premammography period (1977-1979) was compared with the mammographic screening period (2007-2009) for women aged ≥ 40 years. The authors estimated prescreening temporal trends using 5 measures of annual percentage change (APC). Stage-specific incidence values from 1977 through 1979 (baseline) were adjusted using APC values of 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.3%, and 2.0% and then compared with observed stage-specific incidence in 2007 through 2009.
RESULTS: Prescreening APC temporal trend estimates ranged from 0.8% to 2.3%. The joinpoint estimate of 1.3% for women aged ≥ 40 years approximated the 4-decade long APC trend of 1.2% noted in the Connecticut Tumor Registry. At an APC of 1.3%, late-stage breast cancer incidence decreased by 37% (56 cases per 100,000 women) with a reciprocal increase in early-stage rates noted from 1977 through 1979 to 2007 through 2009. Resulting late-stage cancer incidence decreased from 21% at an APC of 0.5% to 48% at an APC of 2.0%. Total invasive breast cancer incidence decreased by 9% (27 cases per 100,000 women) at an APC of 1.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence that a substantial reduction in late-stage breast cancer has occurred in the mammography era when appropriate adjustments are made for prescreening temporal trends. At background APC estimates of ≥ 1%, the total invasive breast cancer incidence also decreased.
© 2014 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; late-stage disease; mammography; overdiagnosis; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24840597     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  21 in total

1.  Quantifying predictive capability of electronic health records for the most harmful breast cancer.

Authors:  Yirong Wu; Jun Fan; Peggy Peissig; Richard Berg; Ahmad Pahlavan Tafti; Jie Yin; Ming Yuan; David Page; Jennifer Cox; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2018-03-07

2.  Disparities in ovarian cancer survival in the United States (2001-2009): Findings from the CONCORD-2 study.

Authors:  Sherri L Stewart; Rhea Harewood; Melissa Matz; Sun Hee Rim; Susan A Sabatino; Kevin C Ward; Hannah K Weir
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  More misinformation on breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-02

Review 4.  The wisdom trial is based on faulty reasoning and has major design and execution problems.

Authors:  Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Assessing predicted age-specific breast cancer mortality rates in 27 European countries by 2020.

Authors:  R Clèries; R M Rooney; M Vilardell; J A Espinàs; T Dyba; J M Borras
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Trends in Lung and Bronchus, Prostate, Female Breast, and Colon and Rectum Cancers Incidence and Mortality in Oklahoma and the United States from 1999 to 2012.

Authors:  Quyen Duong; C Larry Hill; Amanda E Janitz; Janis E Campbell
Journal:  J Okla State Med Assoc       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

7.  [S3 guideline breast cancer: update on early detection, and mammography screening].

Authors:  Ute-Susann Albert; Ingrid Schreer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 8.  Screening for breast cancer in 2018-what should we be doing today?

Authors:  J M Seely; T Alhassan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 9.  Impact of Age and Comorbidity on Cervical and Breast Cancer Literacy of African Americans, Latina, and Arab Women.

Authors:  Costellia H Talley; Karen Patricia Williams
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 1.208

Review 10.  Implications of Overdiagnosis: Impact on Screening Mammography Practices.

Authors:  Elizabeth Morris; Stephen A Feig; Madeline Drexler; Constance Lehman
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.459

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.