| Literature DB >> 24840508 |
Jiafeng Jiang1, Yufang Lu2, Jiangang Li3, Ling Li1, Xin He1, Hanliang Shao4, Yuanhua Dong3.
Abstract
This study investigated the effect of cold plasma seed treatment on tomato bacterial wilt, caused by Ralstonia solanacearum (R. solanacearum), and the regulation of resistance mechanisms. The effect of cold plasma of 80W on seed germination, plant growth, nutrient uptake, disease severity, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) concentration and activities of peroxidase (POD; EC 1.11.1.7), polyphenol oxidase (PPO; EC 1.10.3.2) and phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL; EC 4.3.1.5) were examined in tomato plants. Plasma treatment increased tomato resistance to R. solanacearum with an efficacy of 25.0%. Plasma treatment significantly increased both germination and plant growth in comparison with the control treatment, and plasma-treated plants absorbed more calcium and boron than the controls. In addition, H2O2 levels in treated plants rose faster and reached a higher peak, at 2.579 µM gFW-1, 140% greater than that of the control. Activities of POD (421.3 U gFW-1), PPO (508.8 U gFW-1) and PAL (707.3 U gFW-1) were also greater in the treated plants than in the controls (103.0 U gFW-1, 166.0 U gFW-1 and 309.4 U gFW-1, respectively). These results suggest that plasma treatment affects the regulation of plant growth, H2O2 concentration, and POD, PPO and PAL activity in tomato, resulting in an improved resistance to R. solanacearum. Consequently, cold plasma seed treatment has the potential to control tomato bacterial wilt caused by R. solanacearum.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24840508 PMCID: PMC4026385 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097753
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Effect of cold plasma treatment on tomato seed germination.
| Treatment | Germination potential (%) | Germination rate (%) |
| Control | 67±4a | 80±5a |
| Plasma treatment | 75±4a | 91±3b |
The data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD, n = 4). Different italicized letters within a column indicate significant differences as determined by T test (P<0.05).
Effect of cold plasma treatment on the growth of tomato.
| Plant height (cm) | Leaf thickness (0.01 mm) | Stem diameter (mm) | Chlorophyll content (%) | Leaf area (cm2) | Dry weight (g) | |
| Control | 49.00±2.23a | 31.17±2.23a | 6.29±0.20a | 19.60±0.70a | 635.34±65.98a | 3.56±0.09a |
| Plasma treatment | 54.28±1.96b | 34.50±2.88b | 7.37±0.29b | 17.97±0.31b | 614.30±50.33a | 3.89±0.15b |
The data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 4). Different italicized letters within a column indicate significant differences as determined by T test (P<0.05).
Nutrient content of tomato plants.
| N (g/kg) | P (g/kg) | K (g/kg) | Ca (g/kg) | Mg (g/kg) | B (mg/kg) | Zn (mg/kg) | Mn (mg/kg) | Al (mg/kg) | Fe (g/kg) | |
| Control | 19.59±0.43a | 3.82±0.29a | 15.38±0.53a | 21.47±0.23a | 4.29±0.24a | 85.62±3.41a | 69.88±9.91a | 93.18±8.87a | 721.12±37.97a | 1.05±0.14a |
| Plasma treatment | 18.92±0.53a | 4.07±0.23a | 14.90±0.89a | 23.13±0.70b | 4.25±0.02a | 95.50±2.02b | 73.3±8.85a | 106.6±10.42a | 789.72±84.03a | 1.11±0.11a |
The data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 4). Different italicized letters within a column indicate significant differences as determined by T test (P<0.05).
Figure 1Disease development in tomato after inoculation with R. solanacearum.
Figure 2Changes in H2O2 concentration in tomato leaves from 0 to 96 h after inoculation with R. solanacearum.
Figure 3Changes in POD activity in tomato leaves 0 to 96 h after inoculation with R. solanacearum.
Figure 4Changes in PPO activity in tomato leaves 0 to 96 h after inoculation with R. solanacearum.
Figure 5Changes in PAL activity in tomato leaves 0 to 96 h after inoculation with R. solanacearum.