RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This paper addresses the challenge of investigating fidelity in the implementation of a complex rehabilitation intervention designed to increase the level of independence in personal activities of daily living of stroke patients living in UK care homes. A programme theory of intervention fidelity was constructed to underpin a process evaluation running alongside a cluster randomized trial of the rehabilitation intervention. METHODS: The programme theory has been constructed drawing on principles of realist evaluation. Using data from in-depth semi-structured interviews (n = 17) with all occupational therapists (OTs) and critical incident reports from the trial (n = 20), and drawing from frameworks for implementation, the programme theory was developed. RESULTS: The programme theory incorporates four potential mechanisms through which fidelity within the trial can be investigated. These four programme theory areas are (1) the balancing of research and professional requirements that therapists performed in a number of areas while delivering the study interventions; (2) the OTs rapport building with care home staff; (3) the work focused on re-engineering the personal environments of care home patients; and (4) the learning about the intervention within the context of the trial and its impacts over time. CONCLUSIONS: These findings characterize the real-world nature of fidelity within intervention research, and specifically the negotiated nature of implementation within clinical settings, including individual patients' needs. This research adds to the evidence base because current frameworks for fidelity neglect the importance of learning over time of individuals and across the time span of a trial.
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This paper addresses the challenge of investigating fidelity in the implementation of a complex rehabilitation intervention designed to increase the level of independence in personal activities of daily living of stroke patients living in UK care homes. A programme theory of intervention fidelity was constructed to underpin a process evaluation running alongside a cluster randomized trial of the rehabilitation intervention. METHODS: The programme theory has been constructed drawing on principles of realist evaluation. Using data from in-depth semi-structured interviews (n = 17) with all occupational therapists (OTs) and critical incident reports from the trial (n = 20), and drawing from frameworks for implementation, the programme theory was developed. RESULTS: The programme theory incorporates four potential mechanisms through which fidelity within the trial can be investigated. These four programme theory areas are (1) the balancing of research and professional requirements that therapists performed in a number of areas while delivering the study interventions; (2) the OTs rapport building with care home staff; (3) the work focused on re-engineering the personal environments of care home patients; and (4) the learning about the intervention within the context of the trial and its impacts over time. CONCLUSIONS: These findings characterize the real-world nature of fidelity within intervention research, and specifically the negotiated nature of implementation within clinical settings, including individual patients' needs. This research adds to the evidence base because current frameworks for fidelity neglect the importance of learning over time of individuals and across the time span of a trial.
Authors: Catherine M Sackley; Marion F Walker; Christopher R Burton; Caroline L Watkins; Jonathan Mant; Andrea K Roalfe; Keith Wheatley; Bart Sheehan; Leslie Sharp; Katie E Stant; Joanna Fletcher-Smith; Kerry Steel; Kate Wilde; Lisa Irvine; Guy Peryer Journal: BMJ Date: 2015-02-05
Authors: Claire Goodman; Tom Dening; Adam L Gordon; Susan L Davies; Julienne Meyer; Finbarr C Martin; John R F Gladman; Clive Bowman; Christina Victor; Melanie Handley; Heather Gage; Steve Iliffe; Maria Zubair Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2016-07-16 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Patricia Masterson-Algar; Christopher R Burton; Marian C Brady; Avril Nicoll; Carl E Clarke; Caroline Rick; Max Hughes; Pui Au; Christina H Smith; Catherine M Sackley Journal: Trials Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 2.279