Literature DB >> 24839293

Arts on referral interventions: a mixed-methods study investigating factors associated with differential changes in mental well-being.

E van de Venter1, Am Buller2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Art interventions may provide a cost-effective approach to improving mental well-being. Most evaluations concentrate on intervention characteristics and little is known about other factors which might contribute to successful outcomes.
METHODS: This pre-and-post intervention mixed-methods study explored influences on differential changes in measured well-being among participants of an Arts on Referral (AoR) scheme in the UK. Measured well-being scores of 44 volunteers and findings from six semi-structured interviews were triangulated.
RESULTS: Mean well-being scores improved by 8.0 (95% CI 4.8-11.3, P < 0.0001); the number of sessions attended and baseline scores were positively associated with outcome score. Participants from Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) groups and females appeared to show greater improvement in well-being scores than White British or male participants. Qualitative interviews supported and further explained these findings and suggested differential impacts of AoR may, in part, be explained by the importance of sharing experiences, reduced social isolation and external stressors.
CONCLUSION: This study supports the use of AoR interventions for improving well-being among those facing short- and long-term mental health challenges. However, given the reduced sample size and the pre-post design results should be interpreted with caution and potential differences between ethnic groups and genders should be further explored.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  art; health promotion; mental health; public health

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24839293     DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdu028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)        ISSN: 1741-3842            Impact factor:   2.341


  6 in total

1.  Do people perceive benefits in the use of social prescribing to address loneliness and/or social isolation? A qualitative meta-synthesis of the literature.

Authors:  M Liebmann; A Pitman; Yung-Chia Hsueh; M Bertotti; E Pearce
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 2.908

2.  The way to a man's heart is through his stomach?: a mixed methods study on causal mechanisms through which cash and in-kind food transfers decreased intimate partner violence.

Authors:  Ana Maria Buller; Melissa Hidrobo; Amber Peterman; Lori Heise
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Tracking momentary experience in the evaluation of arts-on-prescription services: using mood changes during art workshops to predict global wellbeing change.

Authors:  Nicola J Holt
Journal:  Perspect Public Health       Date:  2020-05-22

Review 4.  Art making and expressive art therapy in adult health and nursing care: A scoping review.

Authors:  Heli Vaartio-Rajalin; Regina Santamäki-Fischer; Pamela Jokisalo; Lisbeth Fagerström
Journal:  Int J Nurs Sci       Date:  2020-09-28

5.  Exploring how and why social prescribing evaluations work: a realist review.

Authors:  Megan Elliott; Mark Davies; Julie Davies; Carolyn Wallace
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Effectiveness and active ingredients of social prescribing interventions targeting mental health: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthew Cooper; Leah Avery; Jason Scott; Kirsten Ashley; Cara Jordan; Linda Errington; Darren Flynn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 3.006

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.