Literature DB >> 24839179

Elevation of heat shock gene expression from static magnetic field exposure in vitro.

Craig B Laramee1, Paul Frisch, Kenneth McLeod, Gloria C Li.   

Abstract

Previously, we found that extremely low frequency (ELF) electric fields were able to elicit an approximate 3.5-fold increase in heat shock gene expression, a response which may have applicability to cancer therapy. Based on recent studies demonstrating the ability of magnetic fields to influence gene expression, we hypothesized that low level static magnetic fields may be able to affect heat shock gene expression while avoiding some of the clinical difficulties that arise with electric fields. Transfected rat primary cells in monolayer were exposed to magnetic fields of 1 to 440 mT for 16, 24, or 48 h starting at 24 and 48 h post transfection. Heat shock protein (HSP70) expression, as indicated by a promoter linked luciferase reporter, was followed for up to 96 h and showed a dependence on flux density, exposure duration, and start time post transfection. A nonlinear response was observed for increasing flux density with a maximum of a 3.5-fold increase in expression for 48 h of exposure starting 48 h after transfection. These results demonstrate an enhancement of gene expression similar in magnitude to that observed with external electric field exposure, while eliminating many of the clinical complications.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HSP70 expression; RAT-1 cell model; static magnetic field exposure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24839179     DOI: 10.1002/bem.21857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics        ISSN: 0197-8462            Impact factor:   2.010


  8 in total

1.  Role of Sod Gene in Response to Static Magnetic Fields in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Raouia Hanini; Abdelwaheb Chatti; Selma Ben Ghorbel; Ahmed Landoulsi
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Magnetic fields exhibit a positive impact on lipid and biomass yield during phototrophic cultivation of Spirulina sp.

Authors:  Bruno da Costa Menestrino; Luisa Sala; Jorge Alberto Vieira Costa; Jaqueline Garda Buffon; Lucielen Oliveira Santos
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  Effect of static magnetic fields and phloretin on antioxidant defense system of human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Katarzyna Pawłowska-Góral; Magdalena Kimsa-Dudek; Agnieszka Synowiec-Wojtarowicz; Joanna Orchel; Marek Glinka; Stanisław Gawron
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields alters the behaviour, physiology and stress protein levels of desert locusts.

Authors:  Joanna Wyszkowska; Sebastian Shepherd; Suleiman Sharkh; Christopher W Jackson; Philip L Newland
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Cellular Response to ELF-MF and Heat: Evidence for a Common Involvement of Heat Shock Proteins?

Authors:  Olga Zeni; Myrtill Simkó; Maria Rosaria Scarfi; Mats-Olof Mattsson
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-10-18

6.  Vitamin C and Vitamin E Protected B95-8 and Balb/c-3T3 Cells from Apoptosis Induced by Intermittent 50Hz ELF-EMF Radiation.

Authors:  Zhen Ding; Jintao Li; Fan Li; Mohammadreza Mohammadzad Mephryar; Shuicai Wu; Chen Zhang; Yi Zeng
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.429

7.  Lack of effects on key cellular parameters of MRC-5 human lung fibroblasts exposed to 370 mT static magnetic field.

Authors:  Stefania Romeo; Anna Sannino; Maria Rosaria Scarfì; Rita Massa; Raffaele d'Angelo; Olga Zeni
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Biochemical and biomolecular effects induced by a static magnetic field in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Evidence for oxidative stress.

Authors:  Ameni Kthiri; Slah Hidouri; Tahri Wiem; Roua Jeridi; David Sheehan; Ahmed Landouls
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.