Literature DB >> 24839114

Learning curve of full-endoscopic technique through interlaminar approach for L5/S1 disk herniations.

Haidong Xu1, Xiaozhou Liu, Gang Liu, Jiangning Zhao, Qiang Fu, Bin Xu.   

Abstract

Although minimally invasive full-endoscopic (FE) spine surgery through the interlaminar approach has proved safe and effective for surgical treatment of lumbar disk herniation, the learning curve of the procedure has not been sufficiently established. The purpose of this study is to determine the learning curve for the FE surgery through interlaminar approach for treating the L5/S1 disk herniation. Thirty-six patients with lumbar disk herniation (L5/S1 segment) who underwent FE lumbar discectomy through the interlaminar approach between March 2011 and March 2012 were equally divided into Group A, B, and C by the study time of the surgeons. Clinical evaluation data included perioperative parameters (operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, and the amount of intraoperative bone and ligament excision), clinical curative effect index [visual analog scale (VAS) score for leg and back pain], complications, and the rate of conversion to open surgery. The operation duration, intraoperative bleeding, and the amount of bone and ligament excision were gradually and significantly reduced in the Groups A, B, and C (P < 0.01) and reflected in steep curves of proficiency suggesting that the rate of learning was fast. The VAS scores of leg and back pain were significantly improved (P < 0.01) and no symptomatic recurrence was noticed during the follow-up period (1-1.5 years). The outcomes the three groups were not significantly different. The clinical outcomes of the minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of L5/S1 segment disk herniation through the interlaminar approach were excellent suggesting of a satisfactory curative effect. The steep learning curves of perioperative parameters plotted against the number of surgeries conducted suggest that proficiency can be reached reasonably fast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24839114     DOI: 10.1007/s12013-014-0024-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys        ISSN: 1085-9195            Impact factor:   2.194


  5 in total

1.  Endoscopic spine surgery-increasing usage and prominence in mainstream spine surgery and spine societies.

Authors:  Andrew S Chung; Jon Kimball; Elliot Min; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01

Review 2.  Lumbar Endoscopic Microdiscectomy: Where Are We Now? An Updated Literature Review Focused on Clinical Outcome, Complications, and Rate of Recurrence.

Authors:  Giulio Anichini; Alessandro Landi; Federico Caporlingua; André Beer-Furlan; Christian Brogna; Roberto Delfini; Emiliano Passacantilli
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Full-endoscopic discectomy via the interlaminar approach for disc herniation at L4-L5 and L5-S1: An observational study.

Authors:  Wenbin Hua; Ji Tu; Shuai Li; Xinghuo Wu; Yukun Zhang; Yong Gao; Xianlin Zeng; Shuhua Yang; Cao Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Estimation and influence of blood loss under endoscope for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD): a clinical observational study combined with in vitro experiment.

Authors:  Dong Dong Sun; Dan Lv; Wei Zhou Wu; He Fei Ren; Bu He Bao; Qun Liu; Ming Lin Sun
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy: How to decrease the learning curve.

Authors:  Sherif Elsayed Elkheshin; Ahmed Y Soliman
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2020-11-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.