| Literature DB >> 24838928 |
R Dobrowolski1, J Klatka, D Brodnjak-Voncina, A Trojanowska, D Myśliwiec, J Ostrowski, M Remer.
Abstract
A quick and reliable method for the evaluation and classification of two types of tissues is presented. Several chemometric methods were applied to evaluate multivariate data of the tissue samples with respect to the content of trace elements. The content of Pb, Al, Zn, Cd, Cu, Ni and Co was determined in samples of healthy and cancerous tissue obtained from 26 patients. Determination was done at milligram/kilogram level with inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) and atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) techniques. Contents of trace metals in studied tissues are not normally distributed; however, normal distribution was confirmed for log values. There is a statistically significant difference in the content of Zn, Cd, Cu and Al (p<0.01) and Ni and Co (p<0.05) when healthy tissue is compared to cancerous one. Correlation between contents of trace elements for studied tissues was positive; the highest was found between Zn and Cu. A chemometric methodology seems to be a promising tool for classifications of the tissue samples.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24838928 PMCID: PMC4052000 DOI: 10.1007/s12011-014-0013-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Trace Elem Res ISSN: 0163-4984 Impact factor: 3.738
The concentrations of all analysed elements
| Concentration (mg/kg) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Healthy tissue | Cancer tissue | |
| Pb | 0.196 ± 0.068 | 0.119 ± 0.048 |
| Co | 0.033 ± 0.020 | 0.006 ± 0.007 |
| Zn | 55.2 ± 3.7 | 32.4 ± 3.1 |
| Al | 2.28 ± 1.02 | 0.55 ± 0.16 |
| Cd | 0.720 ± 0.205 | 0.327 ± 0.131 |
| Cu | 3.80 ± 0.84 | 2.30 ± 0.28 |
| Ni | 0.188 ± 0.102 | 0.060 ± 0.042 |
One way ANOVA
| ANOVA | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SoS |
| MS |
|
| ||
| Pb | Between groups | 0.077 | 1 | 0.077 | 3.361 | 0.073 |
| Within groups | 1.146 | 50 | 0.023 | |||
| Total | 1.223 | 51 | ||||
| Co | Between groups | 0.009 | 1 | 0.009 | 6.249 | 0.016 |
| Within groups | 0.074 | 50 | 0.001 | |||
| Total | 0.083 | 51 | ||||
| Zn | Between groups | 6,749.692 | 1 | 6,749.692 | 86.782 | 0.000 |
| Within groups | 3,888.884 | 50 | 77.778 | |||
| Total | 10,638.576 | 51 | ||||
| Al | Between groups | 38.960 | 1 | 38.960 | 11.129 | 0.002 |
| Within groups | 175.044 | 50 | 3.501 | |||
| Total | 214.003 | 51 | ||||
| Cd | Between groups | 2.003 | 1 | 2.003 | 10.230 | 0.002 |
| Within groups | 9.790 | 50 | 0.196 | |||
| Total | 11.793 | 51 | ||||
| Cu | Between groups | 28.996 | 1 | 28.996 | 11.198 | 0.002 |
| Within groups | 129.469 | 50 | 2.589 | |||
| Total | 158.465 | 51 | ||||
| Ni | Between groups | 0.211 | 1 | 0.211 | 5.272 | 0.026 |
| Within groups | 1.997 | 50 | 0.040 | |||
| Total | 2.208 | 51 | ||||
SoS sum of squares (variance), df degrees of freedom, MS mean square = SoS/df, F test statistics = MS(between groups)/MS(within groups), p value significance
aIn chemometrics, it is common to say that difference between two groups (in this case, carcinoma/healthy tissue) is statistically significant at 95 % confidence interval if p value is lower than 0.05
Pearson test
| Pb | Co | Zn | Al | Cd | Cu | Ni | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pb | 1.000 | ||||||
| Co | 0.087 | 1.000 | |||||
| Zn | 0.278 | 0.209 | 1.000 | ||||
| Al | 0.088 |
|
| 1.000 | |||
| Cd |
| −0.039 |
| 0.049 | 1.000 | ||
| Cu | 0.025 | 0.150 |
| 0.106 | −0.051 | 1.000 | |
| Ni | 0.114 |
| 0.257 |
| 0.052 | 0.195 | 1.000 |
Table is symmetrical. Pearson(a,b) = Pearson(b,a)
SPEARMAN test
| Pb | Co | Zn | Al | Cd | Cu | Ni | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pb | 1.000 | ||||||
| Co | 0.216 | 1.000 | |||||
| Zn | 0.277 | 0.161 | 1.000 | ||||
| Al | 0.089 | 0.147 |
| 1.000 | |||
| Cd |
| 0.072 |
| 0.204 | 1.000 | ||
| Cu | 0.134 | 0.155 |
| 0.184 | 0.093 | 1.000 | |
| Ni | 0.136 | 0.209 | 0.266 | 0.240 | 0.118 | 0.298 | 1.000 |
Table is symmetrical. Pearson(a,b) = Pearson(b,a)
Fig. 1Dendrogram of the two types of tissue from 26 patients. a No data processing. b Logarithmic concentrations. Cancer-free larynx tissue (1) and carcinoma of the larynx tissue (2)
Fig. 2Biplot analysis of the two types of tissues. Cancer-free larynx tissue (1) and carcinoma of the larynx tissue (2). a No data processing. b Logarithmic concentrations. The closer the points to each other, the more similar tissues are (in terms of content of the studied elements)
Fig. 3Graphical output of LDA for the 52 tissue samples that are separated in two clusters: Cancer-free larynx tissue (1) and carcinoma of the larynx tissue (2). a No data processing. b Logarithmic concentrations. The closer the points to each other, the more similar tissues are (in terms of content of the studied elements)
Classification results for 52 tissue samples into predicted groups
| Classification results | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predicted group membership | Total | ||||
|
|
| ||||
| Original | Count |
| 24 | 2 | 26 |
|
| 3 | 23 | 26 | ||
| % |
| 92.3 | 7.7 | 100.0 | |
|
| 11.5 | 88.5 | 100.0 | ||
| Cross-validated | Count |
| 23 | 3 | 26 |
|
| 3 | 23 | 26 | ||
| % |
| 88.5 | 11.5 | 100.0 | |
|
| 11.5 | 88.5 | 100.0 | ||
H healthy tissue, C cancer tissue
Classification results for 52 tissue samples into predicted groups using logarithmic concentration values of seven elements
| Classification results | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predicted group membership | Total | ||||
|
|
| ||||
| Original | Count |
| 23 | 3 | 26 |
|
| 1 | 25 | 26 | ||
| % |
| 88.5 | 11.5 | 100.0 | |
|
| 3.8 | 96.2 | 100.0 | ||
| Cross-validated | Count |
| 22 | 4 | 26 |
|
| 2 | 24 | 26 | ||
| % |
| 84.6 | 15.4 | 100.0 | |
|
| 7.7 | 92.3 | 100.0 | ||
H healthy tissue, C cancer tissue