Literature DB >> 24838831

Specific pattern of gadolinium enhancement in spondylotic myelopathy.

Eoin P Flanagan1, Karl N Krecke, Richard W Marsh, Caterina Giannini, B Mark Keegan, Brian G Weinshenker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To highlight a specific under-recognized radiological feature of spondylotic myelopathy often resulting in misdiagnosis.
METHODS: Patients evaluated between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 2012 who met the following criteria were included: (1) spondylotic myelopathy was suspected, (2) gadolinium enhancement was detected, and (3) spinal surgery was performed.
RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (70% men) whose median age was 53.5 years (range = 24-80) were included. Spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging (cervical in 52; thoracic in 4) revealed longitudinal spindle-shaped T2-signal hyperintensity (100%) and cord enlargement (79%) accompanied by a characteristic pancakelike transverse band of gadolinium enhancement in 41 (73%), typically immediately caudal to the site of maximal spinal stenosis. Forty (71%) patients were initially diagnosed with neoplastic or inflammatory myelopathies, and decompressive surgery was delayed by a median of 11 months (range = 1-64). Spinal cord biopsy in 6 did not reveal any alternative diagnosis. Ninety-five percent were stable or improved. Gadolinium enhancement persisted in 75% at 12 months, raising concern about the accuracy of the initial diagnosis. Twenty patients required a gait aid (36%) at last follow-up (median = 60 months, range = 10-172). The need for a gait aid preoperatively (p = 0.005), but not delay of surgery, predicted the need for gait aid at final follow-up.
INTERPRETATION: Transverse pancakelike gadolinium enhancement associated with and just caudal to the site of maximal stenosis and at the rostrocaudal midpoint of a spindle-shaped T2 hyperintensity suggests that spondylosis is the cause of the myelopathy. Persistent enhancement for months to years following decompressive surgery is common. Recognition is important to prevent inappropriate interventions or delay in consideration of a potentially beneficial decompressive surgery.
© 2014 American Neurological Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24838831     DOI: 10.1002/ana.24184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Neurol        ISSN: 0364-5134            Impact factor:   10.422


  20 in total

1.  Impact of cervical stenosis on multiple sclerosis lesion distribution in the spinal cord.

Authors:  Daniel Gratch; David Do; Pouya Khankhanian; Matthew Schindler; J Eric Schmitt; Joseph R Berger
Journal:  Mult Scler Relat Disord       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 4.339

2.  Progressive solitary sclerosis: Gradual motor impairment from a single CNS demyelinating lesion.

Authors:  B Mark Keegan; Timothy J Kaufmann; Brian G Weinshenker; Orhun H Kantarci; William F Schmalstieg; M Mateo Paz Soldan; Eoin P Flanagan
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 3.  Differential Diagnosis of Acute Myelopathies: An Update.

Authors:  M Nichtweiß; S Weidauer
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 4.  The current role of MRI in differentiating multiple sclerosis from its imaging mimics.

Authors:  Ruth Geraldes; Olga Ciccarelli; Frederik Barkhof; Nicola De Stefano; Christian Enzinger; Massimo Filippi; Monika Hofer; Friedemann Paul; Paolo Preziosa; Alex Rovira; Gabriele C DeLuca; Ludwig Kappos; Tarek Yousry; Franz Fazekas; Jette Frederiksen; Claudio Gasperini; Jaume Sastre-Garriga; Nikos Evangelou; Jacqueline Palace
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 5.  Pattern Recognition of the Multiple Sclerosis Syndrome.

Authors:  Rana K Zabad; Renee Stewart; Kathleen M Healey
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2017-10-24

6.  Frequent misdiagnosis of adult polyglucosan body disease.

Authors:  Mark A Hellmann; Or Kakhlon; Ezekiel H Landau; Menachem Sadeh; Nir Giladi; Ilana Schlesinger; Daphne Kidron; Oded Abramsky; Avinoam Reches; Zohar Argov; Jose M Rabey; Joab Chapman; Hanna Rosenmann; Aya Gal; J Moshe Gomori; Vardiella Meiner; Alexander Lossos
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 7.  Important Clinical Rehabilitation Principles Unique to People with Non-traumatic Spinal Cord Dysfunction.

Authors:  Peter Wayne New; Inge Eriks-Hoogland; Giorgio Scivoletto; Ronald K Reeves; Andrea Townson; Ruth Marshall; Farooq A Rathore
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2017

Review 8.  Degenerative cervical myelopathy - update and future directions.

Authors:  Jetan H Badhiwala; Christopher S Ahuja; Muhammad A Akbar; Christopher D Witiw; Farshad Nassiri; Julio C Furlan; Armin Curt; Jefferson R Wilson; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 42.937

9.  Unique Gadolinium Enhancement Pattern in Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas.

Authors:  Nicholas L Zalewski; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Waleed Brinjikji; Timothy J Kaufmann; Deena Nasr; Michael W Ruff; Eoin P Flanagan
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 18.302

Review 10.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Features in Acute and Subacute Myelopathies.

Authors:  Stefan Weidauer; Marlies Wagner; Michael Nichtweiß
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 3.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.