Literature DB >> 24838275

Assessment of three-dimensional high-definition visualization technology to perform microvascular anastomosis.

Alex K Wong1, Gabrielle B Davis2, T JoAnna Nguyen2, Kenneth J W S Hui2, Brian H Hwang2, Linda S Chan3, Zhao Zhou2, Wesley G Schooler2, Bala S Chandrasekhar2, Mark M Urata2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Traditional visualization techniques in microsurgery require strict positioning in order to maintain the field of visualization. However, static posturing over time may lead to musculoskeletal strain and injury. Three-dimensional high-definition (3DHD) visualization technology may be a useful adjunct to limiting static posturing and improving ergonomics in microsurgery. In this study, we aimed to investigate the benefits of using the 3DHD technology over traditional techniques.
METHODS: A total of 14 volunteers consisting of novice and experienced microsurgeons performed femoral anastomoses on male Sprague-Dawley retired breeder rats using traditional techniques as well as the 3DHD technology and compared the two techniques. Participants subsequently completed a questionnaire regarding their preference in terms of operational parameters, ergonomics, overall quality, and educational benefits. Efficiency was also evaluated by mean times to complete the anastomosis with each technique.
RESULTS: A total of 27 anastomoses were performed, 14 of 14 using the traditional microscope and 13 of 14 using the 3DHD technology. Preference toward the traditional modality was noted with respect to the parameters of precision, field adjustments, zoom and focus, depth perception, and overall quality. The 3DHD technique was preferred for improved stamina and less back and eye strain. Participants believed that the 3DHD technique was the better method for learning microsurgery. Longer mean time of anastomosis completion was noted in participants utilizing the 3DHD technique.
CONCLUSIONS: The 3DHD technology may prove to be valuable in improving proper ergonomics in microsurgery. In addition, it may be useful in medical education when applied to the learning of new microsurgical skills. More studies are warranted to determine its efficacy and safety in a clinical setting.
Copyright © 2014 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ergonomics; Microsurgery; Three-dimensional; Visualization

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24838275     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  5 in total

Review 1.  Mind the Gap: a Competency-Based Scoping Review of Aesthetic and Reconstructive Reported Simulation Training Models.

Authors:  Rodrigo Tejos; Juan Enrique Berner; Felipe Imigo; Nicolás Besser; Andrea Ramírez; Daniel Moreno; Gonzalo Yañez; Alvaro Cuadra; Susana Searle; Claudio Guerra
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 2.326

2.  Microsurgical training using an ex-vivo model: microscope vs 3D exoscope.

Authors:  Gabriele Molteni; Michael Ghirelli; Andrea Sacchetto; Matteo Fermi; Stefano De Rossi; Francesco Mattioli; Livio Presutti; Daniele Marchioni
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 2.618

3.  Surgeon's comfort: The ergonomics of a robotic exoscope using a head-mounted display.

Authors:  Anto Abramovic; Matthias Demetz; Aleksandrs Krigers; Marlies Bauer; Sara Lener; Daniel Pinggera; Johannes Kerschbaumer; Sebastian Hartmann; Helga Fritsch; Claudius Thomé; Christian F Freyschlag
Journal:  Brain Spine       Date:  2021-12-28

4.  Morphometric analysis of rat femoral vessels under a video magnification system.

Authors:  Rui Sergio Monteiro de Barros; Rafael Aquino Leal; Renan Kleber Costa Teixeira; Vitor Nagai Yamaki; Felipe Lobato da Silva Costa; Daniel Haber Feijó; Andre Lopes Valente
Journal:  J Vasc Bras       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

5.  Microvascular anastomosis under 3D exoscope or endoscope magnification: A proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Evgenii Belykh; Laeth George; Xiaochun Zhao; Alessandro Carotenuto; Leandro Borba Moreira; Kaan Yağmurlu; Baran Bozkurt; Vadim A Byvaltsev; Peter Nakaji; Mark C Preul
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2018-06-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.