Literature DB >> 24838102

Non-publication and delayed publication of randomized trials on vaccines: survey.

Lamberto Manzoli1, Maria Elena Flacco2, Maddalena D'Addario3, Lorenzo Capasso4, Corrado De Vito5, Carolina Marzuillo5, Paolo Villari5, John P A Ioannidis6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the extent of non-publication or delayed publication of registered randomized trials on vaccines, and to investigate potential determinants of delay to publication.
DESIGN: Survey. DATA SOURCES: Trials registry websites, Scopus, PubMed, Google. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials evaluating the safety or the efficacy or immunogenicity of human papillomavirus (HPV), pandemic A/H1N1 2009 influenza, and meningococcal, pneumococcal, and rotavirus vaccines that were registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, Current Controlled Trials, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Clinical Study Register, or Indian, Australian-New Zealand, and Chinese trial registries in 2006-12. Electronic databases were searched up to February 2014 to identify published manuscripts containing trial results. These were reviewed and classified as positive, mixed, or negative. We also reviewed the results available in ClinicalTrials.gov. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Publication status of trial results and time from completion to publication in peer reviewed journals. DATA SYNTHESIS: Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate potential predictors of publication delay.
RESULTS: We analysed 384 trials (85% sponsored by industry). Of 355 trials (404,758 participants) that were completed, 176 (n=151,379) had been published in peer reviewed journals. Another 42 trials (total sample 62,765) remained unpublished but reported results in ClinicalTrials.gov. The proportion of trials published 12, 24, 36, and 48 months after completion was 12%, 29%, 53%, and 73%, respectively. Including results posted in ClinicalTrials.gov, 48 months after study completion results were available for 82% of the trials and 90% of the participants. Delay to publication between non-industry and industry sponsored trials did not differ, but non-industry sponsored trials were 4.42-fold (P=0.008) more likely to report negative or mixed findings. Negative results were reported by only 2% of the published trials.
CONCLUSIONS: Most vaccine trials are published eventually or the results posted in ClinicalTrials.gov, but delays to publication of several years are common. Actions should focus on the timely dissemination of data from vaccine trials to the public. © Manzoli et al 2014.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24838102     DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g3058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  36 in total

1.  Discontinuation and Nonpublication of Randomized Clinical Trials Conducted in Children.

Authors:  Natalie Pica; Florence Bourgeois
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 2.  Delays in the Publication of Important Clinical Trial Findings in Oncology.

Authors:  Lindor Qunaj; Raina H Jain; Coral L Atoria; Renee L Gennarelli; Jennifer E Miller; Peter B Bach
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 31.777

3.  EAP viewpoint on unpublished data from paediatric clinical trials.

Authors:  L Schrier; K Illy; A Valiulis; C Wyder; T Stiris
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  A web-based tool for automatically linking clinical trials to their publications.

Authors:  Neil R Smalheiser; Arthur W Holt
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Assessing the Eventual Publication of Clinical Trial Abstracts Submitted to a Large Annual Oncology Meeting.

Authors:  Paul R Massey; Ruibin Wang; Vinay Prasad; Susan E Bates; Tito Fojo
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-02-17

6.  The ethical problem of randomization.

Authors:  Agostino Colli; Luigi Pagliaro; Piergiorgio Duca
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 7.  Systemic safety of bevacizumab versus ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Lorenzo Moja; Ersilia Lucenteforte; Koren H Kwag; Vittorio Bertele; Annalisa Campomori; Usha Chakravarthy; Roberto D'Amico; Kay Dickersin; Laurent Kodjikian; Kristina Lindsley; Yoon Loke; Maureen Maguire; Daniel F Martin; Alessandro Mugelli; Bernd Mühlbauer; Isabel Püntmann; Barnaby Reeves; Chris Rogers; Christine Schmucker; Manju L Subramanian; Gianni Virgili
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-09-15

8.  Delays in reporting and publishing trial results during pandemics: cross sectional analysis of 2009 H1N1, 2014 Ebola, and 2016 Zika clinical trials.

Authors:  Christopher W Jones; Amanda C Adams; Elizabeth Murphy; Rachel P King; Benjamin Saracco; Karen R Stesis; Susan Cavanaugh; Brian W Roberts; Timothy F Platts-Mills
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 9.  Industry sponsorship and research outcome.

Authors:  Andreas Lundh; Joel Lexchin; Barbara Mintzes; Jeppe B Schroll; Lisa Bero
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-16

Review 10.  Reporting results of research involving human subjects: an ethical obligation.

Authors:  Allison Baer Alley; Jeong-Wook Seo; Sung-Tae Hong
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.