Literature DB >> 24836619

A framework of quality improvement interventions to implement evidence-based practices for pressure ulcer prevention.

William V Padula1, Manish K Mishra, Mary Beth F Makic, Robert J Valuck.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To enhance the learner's competence with knowledge about a framework of quality improvement (QI) interventions to implement evidence-based practices for pressure ulcer (PrU) prevention. TARGET AUDIENCE: This continuing education activity is intended for physicians and nurses with an interest in skin and wound care.
OBJECTIVES: After participating in this educational activity, the participant should be better able to:1. Summarize the process of creating and initiating the best-practice framework of QI for PrU prevention.2. Identify the domains and QI interventions for the best-practice framework of QI for PrU prevention. Pressure ulcer (PrU) prevention is a priority issue in US hospitals. The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel endorses an evidence-based practice (EBP) protocol to help prevent PrUs. Effective implementation of EBPs requires systematic change of existing care units. Quality improvement interventions offer a mechanism of change to existing structures in order to effectively implement EBPs for PrU prevention. The best-practice framework developed by Nelson et al is a useful model of quality improvement interventions that targets process improvement in 4 domains: leadership, staff, information and information technology, and performance and improvement. At 2 academic medical centers, the best-practice framework was shown to physicians, nurses, and health services researchers. Their insight was used to modify the best-practice framework as a reference tool for quality improvement interventions in PrU prevention. The revised framework includes 25 elements across 4 domains. Many of these elements support EBPs for PrU prevention, such as updates in PrU staging and risk assessment. The best-practice framework offers a reference point to initiating a bundle of quality improvement interventions in support of EBPs. Hospitals and clinicians tasked with quality improvement efforts can use this framework to problem-solve PrU prevention and other critical issues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24836619     DOI: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000450703.87099.5b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care        ISSN: 1527-7941            Impact factor:   2.347


  4 in total

1.  Are Evidence-based Practices Associated With Effective Prevention of Hospital-acquired Pressure Ulcers in US Academic Medical Centers?

Authors:  William V Padula; Robert D Gibbons; Robert J Valuck; Mary B F Makic; Manish K Mishra; Peter J Pronovost; David O Meltzer
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  Turning frequency in adult bedridden patients to prevent hospital-acquired pressure ulcer: A scoping review.

Authors:  H-S Jocelyn Chew; Emelia Thiara; Violeta Lopez; Shefaly Shorey
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Clinical Coders' Perspectives on Pressure Injury Coding in Acute Care Services in Victoria, Australia.

Authors:  Carolina Dragica Weller; Louise Turnour; Elizabeth Connelly; Jane Banaszak-Holl; Victoria Team
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-01

4.  Investing in Skilled Specialists to Grow Hospital Infrastructure for Quality Improvement.

Authors:  William V Padula; Madhuram Nagarajan; Patricia M Davidson; Peter J Pronovost
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.243

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.