Christine Echegaray-Benites1, Oxana Kapoustina1, Céline Gélinas2. 1. McGill University, Ingram School of Nursing, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Centre for Nursing Research and Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada; McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montréal, Québec, Canada. 2. McGill University, Ingram School of Nursing, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Centre for Nursing Research and Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Quebec Nursing Intervention Research Network (RRISIQ), Montréal, Québec, Canada; Alan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada. Electronic address: celine.gelinas@mcgill.ca.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Many critically ill patients are unable to self-report their pain. In such situations, the use of valid behavioral pain scales is recommended. OBJECTIVE: To validate the use of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) with brain surgery adults in the neurosurgical intensive care unit. DESIGN: Repeated-measure within subject prospective design. SETTINGS: Forty-three elective brain surgery patients of a Canadian university hospital participated. METHOD: Participants were video recorded and scored with the CPOT before, during and after a non-nociceptive (non-invasive blood pressure using cuff inflation) and a nociceptive (turning) procedure for a total of six assessments. Self-reports of pain were also obtained. RESULTS: Discriminant validation was supported with higher mean CPOT scores during the nociceptive procedure compared with the non-nociceptive one. More participants reported higher pain intensity during turning compared with cuff inflation. Criterion validation was supported with a moderate positive correlation between self-reports of pain intensity and CPOT scores during turning. Interrater and intrarater reliability of CPOT scores through the viewing of participants' videos by two trained raters was supported with high Intraclass Correlation Coefficients. CONCLUSION: The CPOT appears to be valid for the detection of pain in elective brain surgery patients in the neurosurgical intensive care unit.
UNLABELLED: Many critically illpatients are unable to self-report their pain. In such situations, the use of valid behavioral pain scales is recommended. OBJECTIVE: To validate the use of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) with brain surgery adults in the neurosurgical intensive care unit. DESIGN: Repeated-measure within subject prospective design. SETTINGS: Forty-three elective brain surgery patients of a Canadian university hospital participated. METHOD:Participants were video recorded and scored with the CPOT before, during and after a non-nociceptive (non-invasive blood pressure using cuff inflation) and a nociceptive (turning) procedure for a total of six assessments. Self-reports of pain were also obtained. RESULTS: Discriminant validation was supported with higher mean CPOT scores during the nociceptive procedure compared with the non-nociceptive one. More participants reported higher pain intensity during turning compared with cuff inflation. Criterion validation was supported with a moderate positive correlation between self-reports of pain intensity and CPOT scores during turning. Interrater and intrarater reliability of CPOT scores through the viewing of participants' videos by two trained raters was supported with high Intraclass Correlation Coefficients. CONCLUSION: The CPOT appears to be valid for the detection of pain in elective brain surgery patients in the neurosurgical intensive care unit.
Authors: Deborah B McGuire; Karen Snow Kaiser; Mary Ellen Haisfield-Wolfe; Florence Iyamu Journal: Nurs Clin North Am Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 1.208
Authors: Kirsten M Fiest; Henry T Stelfox; Anmol Shahid; Victoria S Owen; Bonnie G Sept; Shelly Longmore; Andrea Soo; Rebecca Brundin-Mather; Karla D Krewulak; Stephana J Moss; Kara M Plotnikoff; Céline Gélinas Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2022-07-16
Authors: Céline Gélinas; Mélanie Bérubé; Kathleen A Puntillo; Madalina Boitor; Melissa Richard-Lalonde; Francis Bernard; Virginie Williams; Aaron M Joffe; Craig Steiner; Rebekah Marsh; Louise Rose; Craig M Dale; Darina M Tsoller; Manon Choinière; David L Streiner Journal: Crit Care Date: 2021-04-13 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Katarzyna Wojnar-Gruszka; Aurelia Sega; Lucyna Płaszewska-Żywko; Stanisław Wojtan; Marcelina Potocka; Maria Kózka Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-01 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Jean-Louis Vincent; Yahya Shehabi; Timothy S Walsh; Pratik P Pandharipande; Jonathan A Ball; Peter Spronk; Dan Longrois; Thomas Strøm; Giorgio Conti; Georg-Christian Funk; Rafael Badenes; Jean Mantz; Claudia Spies; Jukka Takala Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2016-04-13 Impact factor: 17.440