Literature DB >> 24836515

Does stewardship make a difference in the quality of care? Evidence from clinics and pharmacies in Kenya and Ghana.

Connor P Spreng, Ifelayo P Ojo, Nicholas E Burger, Neeraj Sood, John W Peabody, Lisa M Demaria.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure level and variation of healthcare quality provided by different types of healthcare facilities in Ghana and Kenya and which factors (including levels of government engagement with small private providers) are associated with improved quality.
DESIGN: Provider knowledge was assessed through responses to clinical vignettes. Associations between performance on vignettes and facility characteristics, provider characteristics and self-reported interaction with government were examined using descriptive statistics and multivariate regressions.
SETTING: Survey of 300 healthcare facilities each in Ghana and Kenya including hospitals, clinics, nursing homes, pharmacies and chemical shops. Private facilities were oversampled. PARTICIPANTS: Person who generally saw the most patients at each facility. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Percent of items answered correctly, measured against clinical practice guidelines and World Health Organization's protocol.
RESULTS: Overall, average quality was low. Over 90% of facilities performed less than half of necessary items. Incorrect antibiotic use was frequent. Some evidence of positive association between government stewardship and quality among clinics, with the greatest effect (7% points increase, P = 0.03) for clinics reporting interactions with government across all six stewardship elements. No analogous association was found for pharmacies. No significant effect for any of the stewardship elements individually, nor according to type of engagement.
CONCLUSIONS: Government stewardship appears to have some cumulative association with quality for clinics, suggesting that comprehensive engagement with providers may influence quality. However, our research indicates that continued medical education (CME) by itself is not associated with improved care.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24836515     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  3 in total

1.  Use of standardised patients to assess quality of healthcare in Nairobi, Kenya: a pilot, cross-sectional study with international comparisons.

Authors:  Benjamin Daniels; Amy Dolinger; Guadalupe Bedoya; Khama Rogo; Ana Goicoechea; Jorge Coarasa; Francis Wafula; Njeri Mwaura; Redemptar Kimeu; Jishnu Das
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2017-06-10

2.  Brief educational interventions to improve performance on novel quality metrics in ambulatory settings in Kenya: A multi-site pre-post effectiveness trial.

Authors:  Robert Ryan Korom; Stephanie Onguka; Peter Halestrap; Maureen McAlhaney; Mary Adam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Vignette methodologies for studying clinicians' decision-making: Validity, utility, and application in ICD-11 field studies.

Authors:  Spencer C Evans; Michael C Roberts; Jared W Keeley; Jennifer B Blossom; Christina M Amaro; Andrea M Garcia; Cathleen Odar Stough; Kimberly S Canter; Rebeca Robles; Geoffrey M Reed
Journal:  Int J Clin Health Psychol       Date:  2015-01-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.