Fernanda Rosa1, Gabriela Trevisan, Flávia Karine Rigo, Raquel Tonello, Edinéia Lemos Andrade, Marta do Nascimento Cordeiro, João Batista Calixto, Marcus Vinícius Gomez, Juliano Ferreira. 1. From the *Graduate Program in Biological Sciences: Toxicological Biochemistry, Department of Chemistry, Center of Natural and Exact Sciences, Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria (RS); †Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Graduate Program of Health Sciences, Department of Health Sciences, University of Southern Santa Catarina (UNESC), Criciúma, SC, Brazil; ‡Graduate Program in Health Sciences: Medicine and Biomedicine, Institute of Education and Research, Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte, Grupo Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte (MG), Brazil; §Department of Pharmacology, Biological Sciences Centre, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina; and ¶Ezequiel Dias Foundation, Belo Horizonte (MG), Brazil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neuropathic pain is a severe painful pathology that is difficult to treat. One option for its management is the continuous intrathecal (i.t.) infusion of ziconotide (the Conus magnus peptide ω-conotoxin MVIIA), which, in addition to being effective, produces serious adverse effects at analgesic doses. Single i.t. administration of Phα1β, a peptide purified from the venom of the spider Phoneutria nigriventer, has antinociceptive effects with a greater therapeutic window than ziconotide in rodents. To further evaluate its analgesic potential, we investigated the antinociceptive and toxic effects of Phα1β after single or continuous i.t. infusion in a rat model of neuropathic pain. METHODS: Adult male Wistar rats (200-300 g) bred in-house were used. Chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve was used as the neuropathic pain model. Nociception was assessed by detecting mechanical hyperalgesia, considering a significant reduction in 50% paw withdrawal threshold values after CCI compared with baseline values. First, we assessed the antinociceptive effect of a single i.t. injection of Phα1β (10, 30, or 100 pmol/site) in a model of neuropathic pain 8 days after nerve injury. In a different experiment, we delivered Phα1β (60 pmol/μL/h) or vehicle (phosphate-buffered saline, 1.0 μL/h) through continuous infusion using an osmotic pump by spinal catheterization for 7 days in rats submitted to nerve injury. Behavioral adverse effects were evaluated after single or continuous Phα1β i.t. administration, and histopathological analysis of spinal cord, brainstem, and encephalon was performed after continuous Phα1β i.t. injection. RESULTS: We observed that CCI of the sciatic nerve but not sham surgery caused intense (reduction of approximately 2.5 times in mechanical withdrawal threshold) and persistent (up to 14 days) nociception in rats. The single i.t. injection of Phα1β (30 or 100 pmol/site) reduced neuropathic nociception from 1 to 6 hours after administration, without showing detectable side effects. Similarly, the continuous infusion of Phα1β (60 pmol/μL/h for 7 days) was also able to reverse nerve injury-induced nociception from 1 to 7 days, but did not cause either behavioral side effects or histopathological changes in the central nervous system. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, we have shown for the first time that the continuous i.t. delivery of Phα1β produces analgesia disconnected from toxicity in a relevant model of neuropathic pain, indicating that it is an effective and safe drug with a great potential to treat pain.
BACKGROUND:Neuropathic pain is a severe painful pathology that is difficult to treat. One option for its management is the continuous intrathecal (i.t.) infusion of ziconotide (the Conus magnus peptide ω-conotoxin MVIIA), which, in addition to being effective, produces serious adverse effects at analgesic doses. Single i.t. administration of Phα1β, a peptide purified from the venom of the spider Phoneutria nigriventer, has antinociceptive effects with a greater therapeutic window than ziconotide in rodents. To further evaluate its analgesic potential, we investigated the antinociceptive and toxic effects of Phα1β after single or continuous i.t. infusion in a rat model of neuropathic pain. METHODS: Adult male Wistar rats (200-300 g) bred in-house were used. Chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve was used as the neuropathic pain model. Nociception was assessed by detecting mechanical hyperalgesia, considering a significant reduction in 50% paw withdrawal threshold values after CCI compared with baseline values. First, we assessed the antinociceptive effect of a single i.t. injection of Phα1β (10, 30, or 100 pmol/site) in a model of neuropathic pain 8 days after nerve injury. In a different experiment, we delivered Phα1β (60 pmol/μL/h) or vehicle (phosphate-buffered saline, 1.0 μL/h) through continuous infusion using an osmotic pump by spinal catheterization for 7 days in rats submitted to nerve injury. Behavioral adverse effects were evaluated after single or continuous Phα1β i.t. administration, and histopathological analysis of spinal cord, brainstem, and encephalon was performed after continuous Phα1β i.t. injection. RESULTS: We observed that CCI of the sciatic nerve but not sham surgery caused intense (reduction of approximately 2.5 times in mechanical withdrawal threshold) and persistent (up to 14 days) nociception in rats. The single i.t. injection of Phα1β (30 or 100 pmol/site) reduced neuropathic nociception from 1 to 6 hours after administration, without showing detectable side effects. Similarly, the continuous infusion of Phα1β (60 pmol/μL/h for 7 days) was also able to reverse nerve injury-induced nociception from 1 to 7 days, but did not cause either behavioral side effects or histopathological changes in the central nervous system. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, we have shown for the first time that the continuous i.t. delivery of Phα1β produces analgesia disconnected from toxicity in a relevant model of neuropathic pain, indicating that it is an effective and safe drug with a great potential to treat pain.
Authors: Sara M Oliveira; Cássia R Silva; Gabriela Trevisan; Jardel G Villarinho; Marta N Cordeiro; Michael Richardson; Márcia H Borges; Célio J Castro; Marcus V Gomez; Juliano Ferreira Journal: Pflugers Arch Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 3.657
Authors: Rodrigo B M Silva; Samuel Greggio; Gianina T Venturin; Jaderson C da Costa; Marcus V Gomez; Maria M Campos Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 5.590
Authors: Claudio Antonio da Silva Junior; Célio José de Castro Junior; Elizete Maria Rita Pereira; Nancy Scardua Binda; Juliana Figueira da Silva; Marta do Nascimento Cordeiro; Danuza Montijo Diniz; Flavia Santa Cecilia; Juliano Ferreira; Marcus Vinicius Gomez Journal: Pharmacol Rep Date: 2020-01-08 Impact factor: 3.024
Authors: Marcelo R V Diniz; Ana L B Paiva; Clara Guerra-Duarte; Milton Y Nishiyama; Mauricio A Mudadu; Ursula de Oliveira; Márcia H Borges; John R Yates; Inácio de L Junqueira-de-Azevedo Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Danuza Montijo Diniz; Carlos Malamut; Marina Rios Araújo; Andrea Vidal Ferreira; Juliana Figueira Silva; Marta do Nascimento Cordeiro; Marcia Helena Borges; Marco Aurélio Romano Silva; Marcus Vinicius Gomez; Célio Jose Castro Junior Journal: Front Mol Biosci Date: 2022-02-04
Authors: Bruna Luiza Emerich; Renata C M Ferreira; Marta N Cordeiro; Márcia Helena Borges; Adriano M C Pimenta; Suely G Figueiredo; Igor Dimitri G Duarte; Maria Elena de Lima Journal: Toxins (Basel) Date: 2016-04-12 Impact factor: 4.546