Literature DB >> 24835848

Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds in coronary bifurcations: a bench study of deployment, side branch dilatation and post-dilatation strategies.

John A Ormiston1, Bruce Webber, Ben Ubod, Mark W I Webster, Jonathon White.   

Abstract

AIMS: To provide bench insights which may predict safety and efficacy of side branch dilatation (SB) and kissing balloon post-dilatation (KBPD) in Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds deployed in bifurcations. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Stages of deployment and post-dilatation of scaffolds (3.0 and 3.5 mm diameter) in bifurcation phantoms were imaged by fluoroscopy, light microscopy and micro-computed tomography. Dilatation through the scaffold side displaced struts from the side branch (SB) lumen, but caused main branch (MB) malapposition opposite the SB, MB scaffold narrowing beyond the SB, and protrusion of struts into the SB. Scaffold distortion was corrected by MB post-dilatation or by mini-kissing balloon post-dilatation (mini-KBPD). When 3.0 mm diameter balloons were used for SB dilatation or mini-KBPD in 3.0 mm Absorbs, strut fracture did not occur at or below inflation pressures of 10 and 5 atm, respectively. Above these thresholds, the likelihood of strut fracture increased with increasing pressure. Fractures were usually single without malapposition, but mini-KBPD or post-dilatation with high inflation pressures sometimes caused multiple strut fractures and lumen compromise.
CONCLUSIONS: SB dilatation of an Absorb caused MB distortion which was corrected by MB post-dilation or low-pressure mini-KBPD without scaffold damage below pressure thresholds. These benchtop insights may help guide the clinical deployment of Absorb scaffolds in bifurcations and might enhance clinical outcomes but need clinical confirmation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24835848     DOI: 10.4244/EIJY14M05_08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  6 in total

1.  Challenging treatment of in-stent restenosis in a coronary bifurcation by implantation of a bioresorbable scaffold under optical coherence tomography guidance.

Authors:  Grzegorz Zuk; Dariusz Ciecwierz; Piotr Drewla; Marcin Gruchała; Juan Luis Gutiérrez-Chico; Milosz Jaguszewski
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.737

2.  The Proximal Optimisation Technique for Intervention of Coronary Bifurcations.

Authors:  Angela Hoye
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2017-09

3.  Procedural findings and early healing response after implantation of a self-apposing bioresorbable scaffold in coronary bifurcation lesions.

Authors:  Emil Nielsen Holck; Camilla Fox-Maule; Trine Ørhøj Barkholt; Lars Jakobsen; Shengxian Tu; Michael Maeng; Jouke Dijkstra; Evald Høj Christiansen; Niels Ramsing Holm
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Branch ostial optimization treatment and optimized provisional t-stenting with polymeric bioresorbable scaffolds: Ex-vivo morphologic and hemodynamic examination.

Authors:  Wei Cai; Lianglong Chen; Linlin Zhang; Sheng Tu; Lin Fan; Zhaoyang Chen; Yukun Luo; Xingchun Zheng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Bioresorbable magnesium scaffold in the treatment of simple coronary bifurcation lesions: The BIFSORB pilot II study.

Authors:  Trine Ø Barkholt; Omeed Neghabat; Emil N Holck; Lene N Andreasen; Evald H Christiansen; Niels R Holm
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 2.585

6.  Mechanical properties of the drug-eluting bioresorbable magnesium scaffold compared with polymeric scaffolds and a permanent metallic drug-eluting stent.

Authors:  Trine Ø Barkholt; Bruce Webber; Niels R Holm; John A Ormiston
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.