Xuelian Zhao1, Jose Manuel Perez-Aguilar, Felipe Matsunaga, Mitchell Lerner, Jin Xi, Bernard Selling, A T Charlie Johnson, Jeffery G Saven, Renyu Liu. 1. From the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care (X.Z., F.M., J.X., R.L.), Department of Chemistry (J.M.P.-A., J.G.S.), and Department of Physics and Astronomy (M.L., A.T.C.J.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Impact Biologicals Inc., Wallingford, Pennsylvania (B.S.). Current addresses: Department of Anesthesiology, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China (X.Z.); and Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York (J.M.P.-A.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The recent X-ray crystal structure of the murine μ-opioid receptor (MUR) allowed the authors to reengineer a previously designed water-soluble variant of the transmembrane portion of the human MUR (wsMUR-TM). METHODS: The new variant of water-soluble MUR (wsMUR-TM_v2) was engineered based on the murine MUR crystal structure. This novel variant was expressed in Escherichia coli and purified. The properties of the receptor were characterized and compared with those of wsMUR-TM. RESULTS: Seven residues originally included for mutation in the design of the wsMUR-TM were reverted to their native identities. wsMUR-TM_v2 contains 16% mutations of the total sequence. It was overexpressed and purified with high yield. Although dimers and higher oligomers were observed to form over time, the wsMUR-TM_v2 stayed predominantly monomeric at concentrations as high as 7.5 mg/ml in buffer within a 2-month period. Its secondary structure was predominantly helical and comparable with those of both the original wsMUR-TM variant and the native MUR. The binding affinity of wsMUR-TM_v2 for naltrexone (K(d) approximately 70 nM) was in close agreement with that for wsMUR-TM. The helical content of wsMUR-TM_v2 decreased cooperatively with increasing temperature, and the introduction of sucrose was able to stabilize the protein. CONCLUSIONS: A novel functional wsMUR-TM_v2 with only 16% mutations was successfully engineered, expressed in E. coli, and purified based on information from the crystal structure of murine MUR. This not only provides a novel alternative tool for MUR studies in solution conditions but also offers valuable information for protein engineering and structure-function relations.
BACKGROUND: The recent X-ray crystal structure of the murine μ-opioid receptor (MUR) allowed the authors to reengineer a previously designed water-soluble variant of the transmembrane portion of the humanMUR (wsMUR-TM). METHODS: The new variant of water-soluble MUR (wsMUR-TM_v2) was engineered based on the murineMUR crystal structure. This novel variant was expressed in Escherichia coli and purified. The properties of the receptor were characterized and compared with those of wsMUR-TM. RESULTS: Seven residues originally included for mutation in the design of the wsMUR-TM were reverted to their native identities. wsMUR-TM_v2 contains 16% mutations of the total sequence. It was overexpressed and purified with high yield. Although dimers and higher oligomers were observed to form over time, the wsMUR-TM_v2 stayed predominantly monomeric at concentrations as high as 7.5 mg/ml in buffer within a 2-month period. Its secondary structure was predominantly helical and comparable with those of both the original wsMUR-TM variant and the native MUR. The binding affinity of wsMUR-TM_v2 for naltrexone (K(d) approximately 70 nM) was in close agreement with that for wsMUR-TM. The helical content of wsMUR-TM_v2 decreased cooperatively with increasing temperature, and the introduction of sucrose was able to stabilize the protein. CONCLUSIONS: A novel functional wsMUR-TM_v2 with only 16% mutations was successfully engineered, expressed in E. coli, and purified based on information from the crystal structure of murineMUR. This not only provides a novel alternative tool for MUR studies in solution conditions but also offers valuable information for protein engineering and structure-function relations.
Authors: A J Venkatakrishnan; Xavier Deupi; Guillaume Lebon; Christopher G Tate; Gebhard F Schertler; M Madan Babu Journal: Nature Date: 2013-02-14 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Sébastien Granier; Aashish Manglik; Andrew C Kruse; Tong Sun Kobilka; Foon Sun Thian; William I Weis; Brian K Kobilka Journal: Nature Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Shuguang Zhang; Fei Tao; Rui Qing; Hongzhi Tang; Michael Skuhersky; Karolina Corin; Lotta Tegler; Asmamaw Wassie; Brook Wassie; Yongwon Kwon; Bernhard Suter; Clemens Entzian; Thomas Schubert; Ge Yang; Jörg Labahn; Jan Kubicek; Barbara Maertens Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-08-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jin Xi; Jie Xiao; Jose Manuel Perez-Aguilar; Jinglei Ping; A T Charlie Johnson; Jeffery G Saven; Renyu Liu Journal: J Biomol Struct Dyn Date: 2019-10-17
Authors: Carl H Naylor; Nicholas J Kybert; Camilla Schneier; Jin Xi; Gabriela Romero; Jeffery G Saven; Renyu Liu; A T Charlie Johnson Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2016-06-15 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Jinglei Ping; Ramya Vishnubhotla; Jin Xi; Pedro Ducos; Jeffery G Saven; Renyu Liu; Alan T Charlie Johnson Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Chengyu Wen; Bernard Selling; Alexei Yeliseev; Jin Xi; Jose Manuel Perez-Aguilar; Zhaoli Gao; Jeffery G Saven; A T Charlie Johnson; Renyu Liu Journal: IEEE Sens J Date: 2020-12-07 Impact factor: 3.301
Authors: Jin Xi; Nanmu Yang; Jose Manuel Perez-Aguilar; Bernard Selling; John R Grothusen; Rajan Lamichhane; Jeffery G Saven; Renyu Liu Journal: Proteins Date: 2021-06-29