Literature DB >> 24834969

Evaluation of intravenous administration of alfaxalone, propofol, and ketamine-diazepam for anesthesia in alpacas.

Ana M del Álamo1, Ron E Mandsager, Thomas W Riebold, Mark E Payton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of induction of anesthesia with alfaxalone in alpacas. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, crossover design. ANIMALS: Five healthy alpacas (96.7 ± 19.9 kg, 9.6 ± 3.1 years old).
METHODS: The alpacas were anesthetized on three occasions with alfaxalone, propofol, or ketamine-diazepam by intravenous injection. Quality of induction and intubation was assessed using a simple descriptive scale, and quality of recovery was scored: 1 (very poor)-5 (excellent). The auricular artery was catheterized for measurement of systolic (SAP), mean (MAP), and diastolic (DAP) arterial pressures and collection of blood. Variables measured were hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SpO2 ), respiratory rate, and end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (Pe'CO2 ), and ECG. Repeated measures anova was used to assess effects of drug and time. Significance was set at p < 0.05.
RESULTS: Mean dose of alfaxalone sufficient to allow intubation was 2.1 mg kg(-1) . Induction was excellent with all protocols. Heart rate (HR), SAP and MAP were significantly higher following alfaxalone compared to ketamine-diazepam. Blood lactate concentration when standing following alfaxalone was higher compared to minutes 1 and 6, and to propofol (p < 0.05). All alpacas required oxygen supplementation and mechanical ventilation to treat SpO2  < 90% or Pe'CO2  > 60 mmHg. Time from induction to standing was longer with alfaxalone (34.1 ± 3.2 minutes) than propofol (19.0 ±4.3 minutes) or ketamine-diazepam (24.9 ±1.7 minutes). Recovery quality median scores were clinically and statistically different: 2 (alfaxalone), 4 (ketamine-diazepam), and 5 (propofol). Tremors, paddling, rolling, seizure-like activity and thrashing characterized recovery from alfaxalone.
CONCLUSION: Recovery quality was worst with alfaxalone. HR, SAP, MAP were increased at minute 1 in all protocols. Transient hypercapnia and hypoxia was observed with all protocols. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: All protocols were adequate for induction of anesthesia. Alfaxalone alone in unpremedicated alpacas is not recommended.
© 2014 Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists and the American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alfaxalone; alpaca; induction; propofol; recovery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24834969     DOI: 10.1111/vaa.12170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Anaesth Analg        ISSN: 1467-2987            Impact factor:   1.648


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of Systemic Effects of Midazolam, Ketamine, and Isoflurane Anaesthesia in Rabbits.

Authors:  Güneri Atalan; Gültekin Atalan; Hanifi Erol; Muharrem Erol; Ayhan Atasever; Zafer Doğan; Vehbi Güneş; M Kaan Yönez; Ihsan Keleş
Journal:  J Vet Res       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 1.744

2.  Anesthetic and cardiorespiratory effects of single-bolus intravenous alfaxalone with or without intramuscular xylazine-premedication in calves.

Authors:  Sayed Fathi El-Hawari; Hisashi Sakata; Norihiko Oyama; Jun Tamura; Chika Higuchi; Yusuke Endo; Kenjirou Miyoshi; Tadashi Sano; Kazuyuki Suzuki; Kazuto Yamashita
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 1.267

3.  Sedative and physiological effects of alfaxalone intramuscular administration in cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis).

Authors:  Sou Wada; Hironari Koyama; Kazuto Yamashita
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 1.267

4.  The Effect of Xylazine Premedication on the Dose and Quality of Anesthesia Induction with Alfaxalone in Goats.

Authors:  Mahmoud M Abouelfetouh; Lingling Liu; Eman Salah; Rui Sun; Sha Nan; Mingxing Ding; Yi Ding
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 2.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.