Literature DB >> 24834795

Effects of denosumab on pain and analgesic use in giant cell tumor of bone: interim results from a phase II study.

Javier Martin-Broto1, Charles S Cleeland, Paul A Glare, Jacob Engellau, Keith M Skubitz, Ronald H Blum, Kristin N Ganjoo, Arthur Staddon, Martin Dominkus, Amy Feng, Yi Qian, Ada Braun, Ira Jacobs, Karen Chung, Carolyn Atchison.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is an aggressive primary osteolytic tumor. GCTB often involves the epiphysis, usually causing substantial pain and functional disability. Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of nuclear factor κΒ ligand (RANKL), is an effective treatment option for patients with advanced GCTB. This analysis of data from an ongoing, open-label study describes denosumab's effects on pain and analgesic use in patients with GCTB.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with unresectable disease (e.g. sacral or spinal GCTB, or multiple lesions including pulmonary metastases) were enrolled into Cohort 1 (N = 170), and patients with resectable disease whose planned surgery was associated with severe morbidity (e.g. joint resection, limb amputation, or hemipelvectomy) were enrolled into Cohort 2 (N = 101). Patients received denosumab (120 mg) subcutaneously every four weeks, with additional doses on study days 8 and 15. Patients assessed worst pain severity with the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) at baseline, at each visit for the first six months, and every three months thereafter.
RESULTS: Clinically relevant pain improvement was reported by 29% of patients in Cohort 1 and 35% in Cohort 2 during week 1 and by ≥ 50% of patients in each cohort at each study visit from months 2-30. Median time to clinically relevant improvement was 30 (95% CI 16, 57) days in Cohort 1 and 15 (95% CI 15, 29) days in Cohort 2. Results in patients with moderate/severe pain at baseline were similar. Fewer than 30% of patients in Cohort 1 and 10% in Cohort 2 experienced clinically relevant pain worsening at any visit through 27 months. Most patients had no/low analgesic use during the study.
CONCLUSION: Most patients treated with denosumab experienced clinically relevant decreases in pain within two months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24834795     DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.910313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  26 in total

Review 1.  Prognosis of local recurrence in giant cell tumour of bone: what can we do?

Authors:  Yifeng He; Ji Zhang; Xiaoyi Ding
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  Giant cell tumor of bone: current treatment options.

Authors:  Keith M Skubitz
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2014-09

3.  The Changing Sensory and Sympathetic Innervation of the Young, Adult and Aging Mouse Femur.

Authors:  Stephane R Chartier; Stefanie A T Mitchell; Lisa A Majuta; Patrick W Mantyh
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Use of warm Ringer's lactate solution in the management of locally advanced giant cell tumor of bone.

Authors:  Saranatra Waikakul; Apichat Asavamongkolkul; Rapin Phimolsarnti
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-06-28       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  Denosumab in Patients with Giant Cell Tumor and Its Recurrence: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Khodamorad Jamshidi; Mohamad Gharehdaghi; Sami Sam Hajialiloo; Masoud Mirkazemi; Kamran Ghaffarzadehgan; Azra Izanloo
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2018-07

6.  Giant cell tumor: rapid recurrence after cessation of long-term denosumab therapy.

Authors:  George R Matcuk; Dakshesh B Patel; Aaron J Schein; Eric A White; Lawrence R Menendez
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Denosumab: an Emerging Therapy in Pediatric Bone Disorders.

Authors:  Alison M Boyce
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 8.  Mechanisms that drive bone pain across the lifespan.

Authors:  Patrick W Mantyh
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 9.  Understanding osteoporotic pain and its pharmacological treatment.

Authors:  R Vellucci; R Terenzi; J A Kanis; H G Kress; R D Mediati; J-Y Reginster; R Rizzoli; M L Brandi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Fibrous Dysplasia/McCune-Albright Syndrome: A Rare, Mosaic Disease of Gα s Activation.

Authors:  Alison M Boyce; Michael T Collins
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 19.871

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.