Literature DB >> 24834406

3D morphometry using automated aortic segmentation in native MR angiography: an alternative to contrast enhanced MRA?

Matthias Müller-Eschner1, Tobias Müller1, Andreas Biesdorf1, Stefan Wörz1, Fabian Rengier1, Dittmar Böckler1, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor1, Karl Rohr1, Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Native-MR angiography (N-MRA) is considered an imaging alternative to contrast enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) for patients with renal insufficiency. Lower intraluminal contrast in N-MRA often leads to failure of the segmentation process in commercial algorithms. This study introduces an in-house 3D model-based segmentation approach used to compare both sequences by automatic 3D lumen segmentation, allowing for evaluation of differences of aortic lumen diameters as well as differences in length comparing both acquisition techniques at every possible location. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixteen healthy volunteers underwent 1.5-T-MR Angiography (MRA). For each volunteer, two different MR sequences were performed, CE-MRA: gradient echo Turbo FLASH sequence and N-MRA: respiratory-and-cardiac-gated, T2-weighted 3D SSFP. Datasets were segmented using a 3D model-based ellipse-fitting approach with a single seed point placed manually above the celiac trunk. The segmented volumes were manually cropped from left subclavian artery to celiac trunk to avoid error due to side branches. Diameters, volumes and centerline length were computed for intraindividual comparison. For statistical analysis the Wilcoxon-Signed-Ranked-Test was used.
RESULTS: Average centerline length obtained based on N-MRA was 239.0±23.4 mm compared to 238.6±23.5 mm for CE-MRA without significant difference (P=0.877). Average maximum diameter obtained based on N-MRA was 25.7±3.3 mm compared to 24.1±3.2 mm for CE-MRA (P<0.001). In agreement with the difference in diameters, volumes obtained based on N-MRA (100.1±35.4 cm(3)) were consistently and significantly larger compared to CE-MRA (89.2±30.0 cm(3)) (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: 3D morphometry shows highly similar centerline lengths for N-MRA and CE-MRA, but systematically higher diameters and volumes for N-MRA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Magnetic resonance angiography; aorta; automatic data processing; thoracic

Year:  2014        PMID: 24834406      PMCID: PMC3996235          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2013.10.06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther        ISSN: 2223-3652


  18 in total

1.  Feasibility of using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography as the sole imaging modality prior to endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  C N Ludman; S W Yusuf; S C Whitaker; R H Gregson; S Walker; B R Hopkinson
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 7.069

2.  The role of magnetic resonance angiography for endoprosthetic design.

Authors:  D G Neschis; O C Velazquez; R A Baum; D Roberts; J P Carpenter; M A Golden; M E Mitchell; C F Barker; A Pyeron; R M Fairman
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Model-based segmentation and motion analysis of the thoracic aorta from 4D ECG-gated CTA images.

Authors:  Andreas Biesdorf; Stefan Wörz; Tobias Müller; Tim Frederik Weber; Tobias Heye; Waldemar Hosch; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk; Karl Rohr
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2011

4.  3-D quantification of the aortic arch morphology in 3-D CTA data for endovascular aortic repair.

Authors:  Stefan Wörz; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk; Verena Henninger; Fabian Rengier; Hardy Schumacher; Dittmar Böckler; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Karl Rohr
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Intraindividual assessment of the thoracic aorta using contrast and non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography.

Authors:  H von Tengg-Kobligk; J Ley-Zaporozhan; V Henninger; K M Grünberg; F L Giesel; D Böckler; F Krummenauer; H-U Kauczor; S Ley
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2009-02-19

6.  Non-contrast MR imaging for detecting endoleak after abdominal endovascular aortic repair.

Authors:  Elda C Resta; Francesco Secchi; Antonello Giardino; Veronica G Nardella; Giovanni Di Leo; Nicola Flor; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Reliability of semiautomatic centerline analysis versus manual aortic measurement techniques for TEVAR among non-experts.

Authors:  F Rengier; T F Weber; S Partovi; M Müller-Eschner; D Böckler; H-U Kauczor; H von Tengg-Kobligk
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 7.069

8.  Non-gadolinium-enhanced 3-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of thoracic aortic disease: a preliminary experience.

Authors:  Monvadi B Srichai; Sooah Kim; Leon Axel; James Babb; Elizabeth M Hecht
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2010

9.  Noncontrast 3D steady-state free-precession magnetic resonance angiography of the whole chest using nonselective radiofrequency excitation over a large field of view: comparison with single-phase 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Mayil S Krishnam; Anderanik Tomasian; Vibhas Deshpande; Lien Tran; Gerhard Laub; J Paul Finn; Stefan G Ruehm
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 10.  Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis associated with gadolinium based contrast agents: a summary of the medical literature reporting.

Authors:  Dale R Broome
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 3.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.