Literature DB >> 24834259

The effect of 5'untranslated region polymorphism in EGF gene, rs4444903, on colorectal cancer.

Vahid Chaleshi1, Mahdi Montazer Haghighi2, Gholam Reza Javadi1, Seyed Reza Fatemi3, Mohsen Vahedi4, Mohammad Reza Zali3.   

Abstract

AIM: The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship of rs4444903 (EGF+61A/G) SNP genotype with colorectal cancer and tumor stage in an Iranian population.
BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor (EGF) is one of the important proteins that determine survival of cells. EGF binds to its receptor on the cell surface and then activates some of the cell signaling pathway networks within cells that lead to activation or deactivation of factors which are responsible for growth and apoptosis of cells. In this study we assessed the association in EGF polymorphism rs4444903 with colorectal cancer (CRC) in Iranian population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted case-control study to investigate the association of polymorphism rs4444903 in EGF, with colorectal cancer risk in Iranian population. Analyzed Polymorphism of EGF rs4444903 with restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP) among two groups of subjects consisting of including 220 cases with colorectal cancer and 220 healthy individuals as controls. Mutations were confirmed in 10% of the samples by direct sequencing.
RESULTS: The frequencies of AA, AG and GG genotypes among cases with colorectal cancer were 28.2, 46.8, and 25.0 % respectively and in controls genotype frequencies were 23.2, 56.4, and 20.5 %, respectively. Frequency of A allele among case group was 51.6% and for control group was 51.4%. The frequency of G allele in case and control was, respectively 48.4% and 48.6% (OR= 1.009, 95% CI= 0.775-1.315; P= 0.946). The percentage of Stage 0, I, II, III, IV were 5%, 9.35%, 38.84%, 30.21% and 16.54%, respectively, among the cases. However, no significant association between this polymorphism and CRC stage was observed (p=0.626).
CONCLUSION: Our data suggest a SNP rs4444903 may not represent a risk factor in the development and progression of CRC among Iranian population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; EGF+61A/G; Epidermal growth factor; Single nucleotide polymorphism; rs4444903

Year:  2013        PMID: 24834259      PMCID: PMC4017510     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench        ISSN: 2008-2258


Introduction

Colorectal cancer is the second cancer leading to death after lung cancer in the developed countries (1). In 1980, 5.8 percent of all types of cancers were colorectal cancer. In 2000, this cancer has been the fourth cancer after gastric, lung, and liver cancer in Iran. Many studies have indicated that colorectal cancer is increasing in Asians (2–6). The incidence of CRC has increased during the last 25 years in the Iranian population (7). CRC is the fifth most common cancer among Iranian men and third among women (8). According to the statistics from the Iranian Ministry of Health, 1130 patients, 450 women and 680 men, died in 2006 due to colorectal cancer (9). Cancer is caused by genetic and environmental factors. The primary method of therapy is surgery. Finding new diagnostic markers may lead to better diagnosis and treatment (10). One of the most important cancer-related genes is epidermal growth factor (EGF). Epidermal growth factor is encoded by the EGF gene, mapped to chromosome 4q25. The longest transcript of EGF gene shows that it has 24 exons and 23 introns (11). When the EGF protein binds to its receptor (EGFR) on cell surface it activates a series of intracellular signaling networks including PI3K/AKT, Ras/Erk, JAK/STAT. These networks activate or deactivate some transcription factors regulating some proteins responsible for the death or survival of cell (12–14). Single nucleotide polymorphisms(SNP) are the most prevalent sources of human genetic variation that may be associated with increasing risk of cancer (10). The rs4444903 (EGF+61A/G) polymorphism is one of the most important polymorphisms in EGF gene, located in the EGF 5'untranslated region (UTR). rs4444903 polymorphism contains a change of Guanine base (G) whit an Adenine base (A). In a recent study it was suggested that this change causes an increase in EGF expression (15). Epidemiologic studies, based on different tests, show a close correlation between rs4444903 polymorphism and different types of cancer (16–18). Recently a study in Iranian population reported rs4444903 polymorphism has no significant association with colorectal cancer, The stage of the colorectal cancer was not considered (19). The aim of this study was to determine the association of rs4444903 SNP in developing colorectal cancer and its relationship to the tumor stage.

Patients and Methods

Study population

Peripheral blood samples of 220 patients suffering from colorectal cancer and 220 healthy individuals were taken. All patients with colorectal cancer were recruited from Taleghani Hospital, during the period 2006-2011. Colonoscopy was performed by a gastroenterologists and diagnosis was confirmed by a pathologist. Controls were recruited from healthy individuals volunteer. Written informed consent was obtained from all the subjects.

DNA extraction and genotyping

The samples were extracted using standard salting out method and the quality and quantity of DNA was evaluated by Nanodrop Spectrophotometer(20). Genotyping of rs4444903 polymorphism was performed by restriction fragment length polymorphisms analysis. To amplify DNA segment, the specific primers were used (Table 1) (18). The PCR cycle conditions consisted of an initial denaturation step at 95° C for 5 min followed by 30 cycles of 45 s at 95° C; 40 s at 60° C; 45 s at 72° C; and a final elongation at 72° C for 10 min. After PCR, product was run on in to 1% agarose gel in order to ensure a successful reproduction. The products were digested by AluI enzyme (New England Biolabs). The recognition and cutting point of this enzyme is AG/CT, in which SNP region is show by capital letters. Cutting point of enzyme can be observed by a diagonal line. After enzyme digestion, the allele A in 102+91+34+15 bp length, and allele G in 193+34+15 bp lengths were observed. The length of the genotype bands can be seen in the Table 2 (Figure 1). The digested PCR products were determined on a 3% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide for visualization under UV light. To confirm genotyping results, a 10% random sample representing all 3 genotypes was sequenced by automated DNA sequencing, using the ABI genetic analyzer 3130xl (Figure 2).
Table 1

Primer sequence and resulting fragment length for growth factor gene polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

Primer directionPrimer sequence%GCResulting fragment bp
1Forward5'-TGTCACTAAAGGAAAGGAGGT-3'42.86245
2Reverse5'-TTCACAGAGTTTAACAGCCC-3'45
Table 2

The result of RFLP genotyping

RowGenotypeRestriction pattern length (bp)
1AA102+91+34+15
2AG193+102+34+15
3GG193+34+15
Figure 1

Electrophoresis digested products with AluI restricted enzyme on agarose gel showed different bonds. The marker (M) that used was 100 base pairs

Figure 2

Direct DNA sequencing results for the EGF rs4444903, genotype GG and genotype AA were observed from the electropherogram.

Electrophoresis digested products with AluI restricted enzyme on agarose gel showed different bonds. The marker (M) that used was 100 base pairs Direct DNA sequencing results for the EGF rs4444903, genotype GG and genotype AA were observed from the electropherogram. Primer sequence and resulting fragment length for growth factor gene polymerase chain reaction (PCR) The result of RFLP genotyping

Statistical analysis

The cases and controls were compared using a Student's t-test for the continuous variables and a χ2 test for the categorical variables. Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was tested using a goodness-of-fit χ2 test. Unconditional logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), with an adjustment for possible confounders (gender, age and smoking). The statistical significance level consider lower than 0.05. The data were analyzed using of SPSS software (version 13).

Results

In this study 220 patients diagnosed with sporadic CRC were recruited. The patients had an average age of 61.02±12.09. 220 healthy subjects with average age of 41.99±14.35 were recruited as controls (Table 3). The genotype frequencies of the EGF rs4444903 A > G polymorphism among the cases and controls are shown in Table 4. Genotype and allele frequencies were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in two groups. There was no significant deviation in the distribution of the genotypes between the cases and the controls. When the more common rs4444903 GG genotype was used as the reference, the rs4444903 AG and AA genotypes were not significantly associated with the risk of colorectal cancer (adjusted OR=0.727, 95% CI: 0.4 - 1.322; and adjusted OR=1.000, 95% CI: 0.502 - 1.992, respectively). Although the frequency of GG, AA genotypes were lower in stage IV and stage I respectively. There was no apparent association between the EGF polymorphism and stage of colorectal cancer (Table 5).
Table 3

Characteristics of the study population

VariableCRC patients (n=220)Controls (n=220)
Age ( years ± SD )61.02±12.0941.99±14.35
Sex (%)
 Male118 (53.6%)93 (41.5%)
 Female102 (46.4%)127 (58.5%)
Smoking (%)
 Ever15 (6.8%)14 (6.4%)
 Never205(93.2%)206 (93.6%)
Table 4

The genotype and allele frequencies of EGF rs4444903 among CRC patients and controls

GenotypesCRC patients n=220(%)Controls n=220(%)P-valueUnadjusted OR (95%CI)Adjusted OR (95%CI)*
GG55(25.0%)45(20.5%)1.00 (Ref)1.00 (Ref)
AG103(46.8%)124(56.4%)0.2960.680 (0.424 - 1.090)0.727 (0.4 - 1.322)
AA62(28.2%)51(23.2%)1.0000.995 (0.579 - 1.708)1.000(0.502 - 1.992)

Alleles CRC patients n=220(%) Controls n=220(%) p OR (95%CI)

G213(48.4%)214(48.6%)1.00(Ref)
A227(51.6%)226(51.4%)0.9461.009 (0.775 – 1.315)

OR (95%CI): odds ratio (95% confidence interval)

Table 5

Tumor-stage specific distribution of EGF rs4444903 genotypes among colorectal cancer patients

GenotypeStage 0Stage IStage IIStage IIIStage IV P value
AA0(0%)2(15.4%)19(35.2%)13(31.0%)8(34.8%)0.626
AG4(51.1%)6(46.2%)20(37.0%)19(45.2%)10(43.5%)
GG3(42.9%)5(38.5%)15(27.8%)10(23.8%)5(21.7%)
Characteristics of the study population The genotype and allele frequencies of EGF rs4444903 among CRC patients and controls OR (95%CI): odds ratio (95% confidence interval) Tumor-stage specific distribution of EGF rs4444903 genotypes among colorectal cancer patients

Discussion

This study showed no significant association between rs4444903 polymorphism of the EGF gene with risk of colorectal cancer in the studied population. Our findings support a study reported by a similar Iranian study reported by Daraei et al (19). Frequencies of the GG, GA, and AA genotypes in our study were similar to other study in Iran (19). This polymorphism has been studied in glioma, breast, lung, gastric, colon and melanoma cancers (20–26). In most studies investigating the association between this polymorphism and susceptibility of cancer, conflicting results have been reported. Studies in different population showed that no significance association between this polymorphism and risk of cancer (23, 27, 28). In a study reported by Goto et al in 2005, patients suffering from gastric cancer and control group were analysed for polymorphisms in the EGFR gene, no significant correlation was found (27). In a study reported by Gao et al, from China, a uniform distribution of genotypes in two groups of patients and controls was reported, suggesting that there is no significant difference between the patients suffering from esophagus cancer and healthy individuals (28). In 2007 Kang et al studied Korean patients afflicted with lung cancer and reported no significant association between the disease and rs4444903 (23). Studies are also showed association with this polymorphism and other cancers (26, 29, 30). A meta-analysis study was conducted by Zhang et al in 2010. This meta analysis reviewed research conducted on 23 groups, consisting of 5578 patients suffering from a variety of cancers and 7306 healthy individuals - using electronic searches. It showed that allele G is related to the probable increase of cancer (30). Xu et al propose that the EGF rs4444903 polymorphism may be associated with an increased glioma risk among Asians, but a decreased glioma risk among Caucasians(31). The reason for these contradictory findings is not clear. Ethnic heterogeneity, genotype distributions, gene environment interactions and different sample size are may be the probable of this discrepancy (25, 31, 32). Spindler et al studied EGF rs4444903 polymorphism to measure EGF gene expression among healthy subjects. The results showed that GG genotype provides more EGF gene expression (15). Lurje et al reported allele A of the rs44444903 polymorphism is related to a reduction of EGF factor in serum (33). Perhaps, the findings of Lurje and Spindler suggest a possible mechanism regarding allele G and the reason of increased the risk of colorectal cancers(34). In a meta-analysis research that was performed by Wue et al, found that allele A of rs4444903 polymorphism was associated with a decreased susceptibility to cancer among Asian and Americans subjects. Allele A may be a protective factor for gastric, esophagus cancer, and liver tumors (35). Finally we could not find any evidence to support an association between the rs4444903 polymorphism and colorectal cancer. We also found no correlation between this polymorphism and tumor stage.
  32 in total

Review 1.  Surviving cell death through epidermal growth factor (EGF) signal transduction pathways: implications for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Henson; Spencer B Gibson
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 4.315

2.  A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells.

Authors:  S A Miller; D D Dykes; H F Polesky
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1988-02-11       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  No association of EGF polymorphism with schizophrenia in a Japanese population.

Authors:  Yuichiro Watanabe; Naoki Fukui; Tatsuyuki Muratake; Naoshi Kaneko; Toshiyuki Someya
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Effect of rs6983267 polymorphism in the 8q24 region and rs4444903 polymorphism in EGF gene on the risk of sporadic colorectal cancer in Iranian population.

Authors:  A Daraei; R Salehi; M Salehi; M H Emami; M Janghorbani; M Jonghorbani; F Mohamadhashem; H Tavakoli
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  No association between EGF gene polymorphism and gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Goto; Takafumi Ando; Hidemi Goto; Nobuyuki Hamajima
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 6.  Genetic polymorphisms of the epidermal growth factor and related receptor in non-small cell lung cancer--a review of the literature.

Authors:  António Araújo; Ricardo Ribeiro; Isabel Azevedo; Ana Coelho; Marta Soares; Berta Sousa; Daniela Pinto; Carlos Lopes; Rui Medeiros; Giorgio V Scagliotti
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2007-02

7.  Colorectal cancer incidence trends by subsite in urban Shanghai, 1972-1994.

Authors:  B T Ji; S S Devesa; W H Chow; F Jin; Y T Gao
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  The EGF 61A/G polymorphism - a predictive marker for recurrence of liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Florian M Kovar; Christiane Thallinger; Claudia L Marsik; Thomas Perkmann; Harald Puhalla; Helmuth Haslacher; Fritz Wrba; Oswald F Wagner; Thomas Gruenberger; Georg Endler
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.704

9.  Colorectal cancer in Iran: an epidemiological study.

Authors:  Safaee Azadeh; B Moghimi-Dehkordi; S R Fatem; M A Pourhoseingholi; S Ghiasi; M R Zali
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar

10.  Association between EGF, TGF-beta1, VEGF gene polymorphism and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Guo-yang Wu; Till Hasenberg; Richard Magdeburg; Roderich Bönninghoff; Jörg W Sturm; Michael Keese
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Host nucleotide polymorphism in hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Shilu Mathew; Hany Abdel-Hafiz; Abbas Raza; Kaneez Fatima; Ishtiaq Qadri
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-04-08

2.  Association of Epidermal Growth Factor 61A>G, Survivin -31G>C, and EFNA1 -1732G>A Polymorphisms with Susceptibility to Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Fatemeh Asadian; Mohammadamin Ghadyani; Mohamad Hossein Antikchi; Seyed Alireza Dastgheib; Hossein Neamatzadeh; Elnaz Sheikhpour; Sahel Khajehnoori; Seyed Sajjad Tabei
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2020-11-12

3.  The genetic association between EGF A61G polymorphism (rs4444903) and risk of colorectal cancer: An update meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Yi Zhu; ZhiHeng Chen; HongGang Jiang; BoHao Lu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Different frequency of epidermal growth factor rs76189946 polymorphism genotype in an Iranian colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Vahid Chaleshi; Sanaz Savabkar; Hesamodin Dolatmoradi; Mahdi Montazer Haghighi; Elmira Khalili Maryan; Sara Pasha; Narges Ebrahimi Vandfaez; Ehsan Nazemalhosseini Mojarad; Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei; Mohammad Reza Zali
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2013

5.  The association between EGF A61G polymorphism and risk of colorectal cancer in a Chinese population: a case-control study.

Authors:  Xiaoying Zhu; Yan Shen; Qigui Xie
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.840

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.