Literature DB >> 24834184

Frequency of Clostridium difficile among patients with gastrointestinal complaints.

Ehsan Nazemalhosseini-Mojarad1, Masoumeh Azimirad1, Maryam Razaghi1, Parisa Torabi1, Ali Moosavi1, Masoud Alebouyeh1, Mohammad Mehdi Aslani2, Mohammad Reza Zali1.   

Abstract

AIM: In this study, the prevalence of C. difficile, from patients with gastrointestinal complaints and its association with other enteropathogen microbes were investigated.
BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile is an important pathogen associated with outbreaks of pseudomembranous colitis and other intestinal disorders, such as diarrhea. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Enterotoxin and cytotoxin (toxin A and toxin B) of C. difficile on the patient's stool samples were detected by a double sandwich enzyme-linked Immunosorbant assay technique using a commercial kit (Premier toxins A & B; Generic Assays, Inc., Germany). The microbial isolation and examination was done, according to the standard identification methods.
RESULTS: Out of 356 individuals (57.6% male and 42.4% female) the results of C. difficile were positive for 19 patients (5.3%) and negative for 337 patients (94.6%) according to the results of C. difficile antigen kit. There was no association between the existence of C. difficile toxin and microbial population or antibiotic usage.
CONCLUSION: This prevalence study clearly supports the hypothesis of a probable role of C.difficile in developing gastrointestinal complaints in patients with diarrhea. More studies are needed to evaluate the role of C. difficile in these diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clostridium difficile; Gastrointestinal complaints; Iran

Year:  2011        PMID: 24834184      PMCID: PMC4017434     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench        ISSN: 2008-2258


Introduction

Clostridium difficile (C.difficile) is responsible for more than 90% of cases of pseudomembranous colitis and approximately 25% of diarrhea cases observed during or after antibiotic therapy (1). Clinical manifestations of infection range from asymptomatic colonization, to severe diarrhea, pseudomembranous colitis (PMC), toxic megacolon and death (2). C.difficile produces two toxins, toxin A (enterotoxin) and toxin B (cytotoxin). These are thought to be the primary causes of colonic mucosal injury and inflammation. Strains of C.difficile that do not produce the toxins are not pathogenic. The importance of detecting toxin B relative to toxin A has been extensively investigated. Initially, toxin A was reported to be responsible for the disease (3). However, the role of toxin B has been reviewed and toxin B is now considered more important than toxin A, and possibly essential for virulence (3–6). Rapid diagnosis of this pathogen is decisive in allowing clinicians to prescribe the appropriate therapy and to take adequate measurement for controlling nosocomial spread. Various laboratory methods may be used to detect the presence of C. difficile or its related toxins (7, 8). In Iran, only a small number of clinical laboratories are able to reach a definitive diagnosis of C. difficile infection, because simple reliable assays for toxins in isolates are not available. The gold standard for diagnosis is a tissue culture assay for the cytotoxicity of toxin B, utilizing pre-incubation with neutralizing antibody against this toxin to show the specificity of cytotoxicity. This test can detect as little as 10 picograms of toxin B in stool and has a high sensitivity (94-100%) and specificity (99%). However, the test takes 1-3 days to complete and requires tissue culture facilities. More recently, enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) have been developed to detect toxin A and/or B in stool. These assays detect 100-1000 picograms of either toxin and have a sensitivity of 66-94% and a specificity of 92-98% (7–11). We believe a local prevalence study of an infectious disease in our community is an initial step towards the introduction of the proper interventions for controlling the disease. This report has investigated on the frequency of C. difficile infection and any correlation between infection and gastrointestinal symptoms or disorders.

Patients and Methods

A total of 356 stool samples were collected from patients who had been referred to the department of foodborne and diarrheal diseases, Taleghani Hospital, Tehran. Patient complaints included abdominal pain, flatulence, tenesmus, diarrhea and dysentery. Stool samples were cultured for pathogenic bacteria and fungi. Presence of cryptosporidium spp. and other parasites were also investigated by modified acid-fast stains and other standard laboratory methods, respectively. Detection of enterotoxin and cytotoxin (toxin A and toxin B) of C. difficile was performed on the stool specimens by a double sandwich enzyme-linked Immunosorbant assay technique using a commercial kit (Premier toxins A & B; Generic Assays, Inc., Germany). The assay was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Results

Out of the 356 individuals (57.6% male and 42.4% female) referred to the department of foodborne and diarrheal diseases, C. difficile were positive for 19 (5.3%) patients. Table 1 indicated the distribution of C.difficile in patients with gastrointestinal complaints according to gender.
Table 1

Gender distribution of C. difficile in patients with gastrointestinal complaints

positivenegativetotal

no%no%no%
Male136.319263.620557.6
Female641459615142.3
total195.333794.6356100
Gender distribution of C. difficile in patients with gastrointestinal complaints No enteric pathogen including bacteria and intestinal parasite were founded. The most common non-pathogen parasite was E.coli (5.1%) followed by I.bottcheli (2.2%). All 356 subjects present GI symptoms, including abdominal pain (60%), diarrhea (31.5%), nausea (28.5%), vomiting (10.2%) and other related symptoms (48.5%) (Table 2). Of 356 patients recruited stool samples, 284 were reported as normal stool and 72 (20.22%) as diarrheic stool. Of 356 patients, 23 (4.6%) patients were taken antibiotics during the study. Distribution of gastrointestinal symptoms in patients infected by C. difficile compare to non-infected.
Table 2

Distribution of gastrointestinal symptoms in patients infected by C. difficile compared to non-infected

Symptomspositivenegative
abdominal pain20%45%
Diarrhea45%32%
Nausea5.2%14.6%
Vomiting8.2%4.2%
other related symptoms38.5%28.6%
Distribution of gastrointestinal symptoms in patients infected by C. difficile compared to non-infected

Discussion

C. difficile is an organism that can be found in most of people's without causing symptoms, but in some people it can cause a severe colitis. Predisposing actors include antibiotic therapy. The C. difficile toxin damages the fragile lining of the bowel causing loose watery bowel movements (diarrhea) (12). The organism is usually acquired from the hospital, as environmental contamination is common and health care workers may carry it in their hands, or on contaminated instruments. Due to the rapidity of testing and ease of performance, ELISAs for toxin A and B are now used most frequently by clinical laboratories for diagnosis of C. difficile infection. In our study C. difficile infection was detected in 5.3% of patients with gastrointestinal complaints. According to a previous study in Iran, C. difficile was isolated from 6.1% of patients with nosocomial diarrhea and 4% in children with diarrhea in Iran (13, 14). This amount was reported 4.9% for Turkish patients with diarrhea (15). Only 4.6% of the patients with toxigenic C. difficile were taking antibiotics at the time of the sampling and 96.4% of them have not used antibiotics. These results contrast with the other study in Iran, that reported that all of their hospitalized patients with toxigenic C.difficile positive stool samples have taken antibiotics at the time of the sampling (13). In Brazil, C. difficile was detected in 5.5% of hospitalized children with acute diarrhea and in Argentina 38.5% C. difficile positive samples were detected from symptomatic patients (4, 16). Our study has a number of limitations. We used an ELISA test for screening that has a high specificity (99–100%) but a low sensitivity (75– 85%) to detect C.difficile toxins A and B (17, 18). Our study showed that C.difficile was potentially the pathogen responsible for gastrointestinal complaints in a significant proportion of patients who denied antibiotics therapy, prior to their admission to hospitals. As a consequence it seems necessary to investigate the mechanisms involved in the infection and pathogenesis of this organism within different populations and different host microenvironments.
  13 in total

1.  Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis: usefulness of Premier Cytoclone A+B enzyme immunoassay for combined detection of stool toxins and toxigenic C. difficile strains.

Authors:  A Lozniewski; C Rabaud; E Dotto; M Weber; F Mory
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Pseudomembranous colitis caused by a toxin A(-) B(+) strain of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  A P Limaye; D K Turgeon; B T Cookson; T R Fritsche
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of methods for detection of toxins in specimens of feces submitted for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  D O'Connor; P Hynes; M Cormican; E Collins; G Corbett-Feeney; M Cassidy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis. American College of Gastroenterology, Practice Parameters Committee.

Authors:  R Fekety
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Clostridium difficile acquisition rate and its role in nosocomial diarrhoea at a university hospital in Turkey.

Authors:  G Söyletir; A Eskitürk; G Kiliç; V Korten; N Tözün
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 6.  Clostridium difficile--Associated diarrhea: A review.

Authors:  E Mylonakis; E T Ryan; S B Calderwood
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2001-02-26

7.  Prevalence and pathogenicity of Clostridium difficile in hospitalized patients. A French multicenter study.

Authors:  F Barbut; G Corthier; Y Charpak; M Cerf; H Monteil; T Fosse; A Trévoux; B De Barbeyrac; Y Boussougant; S Tigaud; F Tytgat; A Sédallian; S Duborgel; A Collignon; M E Le Guern; P Bernasconi; J C Petit
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1996-07-08

Review 8.  Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  D H Gröschel
Journal:  Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 6.250

9.  Risk factors for Clostridium difficile colonisation and toxin production.

Authors:  John M Starr; Heather Martin; Jodie McCoubrey; Gavin Gibson; Ian R Poxton
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 10.668

10.  The diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: comparison of Triage C. difficile panel, EIA for Tox A/B and cytotoxin assays.

Authors:  M J Alfa; B Swan; B VanDekerkhove; P Pang; G K M Harding
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.803

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The emergence of Clostridium difficile infection in Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence and impact.

Authors:  Nienke Z Borren; Shadi Ghadermarzi; Susan Hutfless; Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Pathogenicity locus determinants and toxinotyping of Clostridioides difficile isolates recovered from Iranian patients.

Authors:  A Aliramezani; M Talebi; A Baghani; M Hajabdolbaghi; M Salehi; A Abdollahi; S Afhami; M Marjani; F Golbabaei; M A Boroumand; A Sarrafnejad; M Yaseri; S Ghourchian; M Douraghi
Journal:  New Microbes New Infect       Date:  2018-08-02

Review 3.  Burden of Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile Infection among Patients in Western Asia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yalda Malekzadegan; Mehrdad Halaji; Meysam Hasannejad-Bibalan; Saba Jalalifar; Javad Fathi; Hadi Sedigh Ebrahim-Saraie
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.429

4.  Frequency of antibiotic associated diarrhea caused by Clostridium difficile among hospitalized patients in intensive care unit, Kerman, Iran.

Authors:  Ebrahim Rezazadeh Zarandi; Shahla Mansouri; Nouzar Nakhaee; Farhad Sarafzadeh; Zahra Iranmanesh; Mohammad Moradi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2017

5.  Clostridium difficile in patients with nosocomial diarrhea, Northwest of Iran.

Authors:  Yalda Hematyar; Tahereh Pirzadeh; Seyyed Reza Moaddab; Mohammad Ahangarzadeh Rezaee; Mohammad Yousef Memar; Hossein Samadi Kafil
Journal:  Health Promot Perspect       Date:  2020-03-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.