| Literature DB >> 24834101 |
Na Dai1, Ling Fang1, Yu-Bo Li1, Yu-Ming Wang1, Ju Yin2, Bao-Chan Pu1.
Abstract
Primary dysmenorrhea is a common gynecological disease garnering increasing attention and research. To investigate the clinical therapeutic effects of Jingqian Zhitong Fang (JQF) and the differences in serum sex hormone levels during the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea, we selected 30 healthy volunteers and 60 individuals with primary dysmenorrhea. On the third day of the menstrual cycle, we used ELISA to determine the levels of serum prolactin (PRL), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), testosterone (TEST), progesterone (PROG), and estradiol (E2) compared with normal levels and levels in the JQF group, the Western medicine group receiving continuous treatment during the first and third menstrual cycles, and the group followed up after the drug was stopped. We observed that after JQF treatment, the levels of the following hormones changed significantly: PRL, LH, TEST, and E2 levels decreased significantly and the PROG level increased significantly after treatment. After treatment with Western medicine, the serum levels of FSH, LH, PROG, and E2 showed no significant change. We conclude that the long-term effect of JQF treatment was better than that of Western medicine. JQF treatment of primary dysmenorrhea is related to adjustment of PRL, LH, TEST, and E2 hormone levels in the human body.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24834101 PMCID: PMC4009195 DOI: 10.1155/2014/876431
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Comparison of women with primary dysmenorrhea in the first and third menstrual cycles with JQF and Western medicine treatment and follow-up after treatment [n (%)].
|
| Markedly effective | Effective | Ineffective | Total efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J one cycle | 30 | 16 (53.3) | 10 (33.3) | 4 (13.3) | 88.7 |
| J three cycles | 19 | 13 (68.4) | 5 (26.3) | 1 (5.3) | 94.7 |
| J follow-up | 17 | 13 (76.5) | 3 (17.6) | 1 (5.9) | 94.1 |
| W one cycle | 30 | 24 (80.0) | 4 (13.3) | 2 (6.7) | 93.3 |
| W three cycles | 20 | 14 (70.0) | 4 (20.0) | 2 (10.0) | 90.0 |
| W follow-up | 20 | 0 (0.0) | 4 (20.0) | 16 (80.0) | 20.0 |
“W” stands for the Western medicine treatment group; “J” stands for the JQF treatment group.
The integral contrasts in primary dysmenorrhea after treatment.
| JQF group ( | Western medicine group ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | 11.52 ± 3.36 (30) | 11.86 ± 2.98 (30) |
| The first cycle | 7.35 ± 3.15* (30) | 8.86 ± 2.76** (30) |
| The third cycle | 1.86 ± 1.69** (19) | 2.56 ± 1.54** (20) |
| Follow-up | 1.43 ± 1.12** (17) | 11.88 ± 4.13 (20) |
**Integral values of the degree of dysmenorrhea before and after treatment, P < 0.01. *P < 0.05.
Comparison of serum sex hormone levels in women with primary dysmenorrhea after JQF treatment and follow-up (χ 2 ± S).
| PRL (ng/mL) | FSH (mIU/mL) | LH (mIU/mL) | TEST (ng/mL) | PROG (ng/mL) | E2 (ng/mL) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls ( | 13.93 ± 2.65 | 3.71 ± 0.64 | 6.64 ± 1.69 | 0.91 ± 0.16 | 1.14 ± 2.06 | 70.00 ± 13.57 |
| J dysmenorrhea ( | 19.70 ± 4.09## | 3.68 ± 0.67 | 8.05 ± 3.64# | 1.33 ± 0.23## | 0.58 ± 0.20 | 99.80 ± 25.80## |
| J one cycle ( | 15.75 ± 1.26** | 3.95 ± 0.70 | 6.86 ± 3.06 | 1.01 ± 0.20** | 0.77 ± 0.41* | 67.85 ± 11.72** |
| J three cycles ( | 13.58 ± 2.24** | 3.78 ± 0.36 | 5.99 ± 0.90* | 0.89 ± 0.12** | 1.02 ± 0.46* | 69.05 ± 8.40** |
| J follow-up ( | 12.90 ± 2.41** | 3.87 ± 0.51 | 6.00 ± 1.30* | 0.87 ± 0.15** | 1.04 ± 0.44** | 68.23 ± 11.07** |
| W dysmenorrhea ( | 21.56 ± 2.88## | 4.31 ± 0.82 | 9.74 ± 2.42# | 1.34 ± 0.16## | 0.56 ± 0.19 | 104 ± 18.90## |
| W one cycle ( | 19.13 ± 0.99* | 3.93 ± 0.37 | 6.61 ± 1.28** | 0.92 ± 0.11** | 0.73 ± 0.16 | 85.75 ± 9.39** |
| W three cycles ( | 18.6 ± 0.89* | 4.02 ± 0.45 | 6.2 ± 0.77** | 0.89 ± 0.08** | 0.8 ± 0.13 | 86.57 ± 9.28* |
| W follow-up ( | 19.27 ± 1.40* | 3.74 ± 0.60 | 7.10 ± 0.60 | 1.02 ± 0.30** | 0.71 ± 0.24 | 89.00 ± 4.76 |
“W” stands for the Western medicine treatment group; “J” stands for the JQF treatment group.
Comparison of women with dysmenorrhea treated for the first and third cycles and the follow-up group, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05.
Comparison of women with dysmenorrhea with women in the volunteer group, before treatment ## P < 0.01, # P < 0.05.
Figure 1The correlation coefficients between the levels of six hormones and the scores for the extent of the disease (the bars indicate the confidence intervals of the coefficients. The coefficient is significant when the confidence interval does not cross zero.).
E2, P, PGF2, and PGE2 levels of dysmenorrhea rat uterine tissue in different groups (χ ± S, n = 8, ng/mL).
| E2 | P | PGF2 | PGE2 | PGF2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 19.07 ± 3.32 | 36.20 ± 24.76 | 209.65 ± 77.51 | 801.12 ± 111.32 | 0.27 ± 0.11 |
| Model group | 38.75 ± 10.57** | 18.02 ± 15.01* | 802.79 ± 153.69** | 594.88 ± 137.15** | 1.50 ± 0.56** |
| J one cycle | 23.63 ± 3.09## | 23.11 ± 8.96# | 505.65 ± 98.02## | 619.65 ± 187.78 | 0.99 ± 0.39 |
| J three cycles | 21.43 ± 3.85## | 28.25 ± 2.81## | 221.42 ± 140.67## | 810.35 ± 208.62# | 0.27 ± 0.16## |
| W one cycle | 25.94 ± 7.31## | 20.02 ± 4.51 | 521.67 ± 31.31## | 608.17 ± 23.81 | 0.85 ± 1.31 |
| W three cycles | 23.13 ± 3.09## | 22.00 ± 3.38# | 488.78 ± 134.22## | 875.62 ± 244.11# | 0.59 ± 0.12## |
Note: compared with normal control group: **P < 0.01, compared with model group: ## P < 0.01, # P < 0.05. *P < 0.05.