| Literature DB >> 24833998 |
Mitsuo Ishii1, Takahiro Aoki1, Kazuhiro Yamakawa1, Fumie Magata1, Chikara Gojo2, Katsumi Ito3, Mitsunori Kayano1, Yasuo Nambo4.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to clarify the relationship between the placental retention time (PRT) and the reproductive performance following mating at the foal heat in Thoroughbreds. For this purpose, we interviewed 292 farmers over a period of 3 years with questionnaires evaluating foaling, expulsion of placenta and reproductive performance at the foal heat in 1,432 mares. The obtained data were later compared with a previous study of heavy draft mares. The average of the PRT of the 1,432 Thoroughbred mares was 58 ± 88 min (mean ± SD). The mean PRT of Thoroughbreds was significantly shorter than that of the148 min of heavy draft mares. The incidences of retained placenta (RP) occurring in the Thoroughbred mares were 5.2 and 4.0%, for over 3 and 4 hr after foaling, respectively. The incidence of RP over 4 hr was significantly lower than that of 25% in heavy draft mares. The pregnancy rate at foal heat of the mares in which PRT was less than 3 hr was 37%, and it significantly decreased to 11% for those with PRT of more than 3 hr. In the comparison of the reproductive performance between Thoroughbred and heavy draft mares, the pregnancy rate of Thoroughbreds dropped drastically to 10% when PRT exceeded 40, and in consequence, the pregnancy rate of Thoroughbreds was significantly lower than the 30% of heavy draft mares, which had a PRT of over 4 hr. In conclusion, the Thoroughbred mares had a low incidence of RP, however, a PRT exceeding 3 hr severely affected the reproductive performance at the foal heat.Entities:
Keywords: Thoroughbred; foaling; heavy draft; placental retention time; reproductive performance
Year: 2013 PMID: 24833998 PMCID: PMC4013983 DOI: 10.1294/jes.24.25
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Equine Sci ISSN: 1340-3516
Fig. 1.Distribution of Thoroughbred mares according to PRT. ( ): Number of mares.
Fig. 2.Change in reproductive performance at the foal heat according to PRT. a vs. b, c vs. d, e vs. f: significant differences (P<0.05). ( ): Number of mares.
Fig. 3.The distribution of Thoroughbred and heavy draft according to PRT. **: Significant difference between Thoroughbred and heavy draft in the same PRT category (P<0.05). ( ): Number of mares.
Fig. 4.Comparison of the reproductive performance of Thoroughbred and heavy draft at the foal heat according to PRT. A vs. B, C vs. D, E vs. F: significant differences (P<0.01). a vs. b: significant difference between lowercase letters (P<0.05). **: Significant difference between Thoroughbred and heavy draft (P<0.01). *: Significant difference between Thoroughbred and heavy draft (P<0.05). ( ): Number of mares.