Literature DB >> 24833864

Liver transplantation for hepatic tumors: a systematic review.

Matteo Ravaioli1, Giorgio Ercolani1, Flavia Neri1, Matteo Cescon1, Giacomo Stacchini1, Massimo Del Gaudio1, Alessandro Cucchetti1, Antonio Daniele Pinna1.   

Abstract

Improvements in the medical and pharmacological management of liver transplantation (LT) recipients have led to a better long-term outcome and extension of the indications for this procedure. Liver tumors are relevant to LT; however, the use of LT to treat malignancies remains a debated issue because the high risk of recurrence. In this review we considered LT for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), liver metastases (LM) and other rare tumors. We reviewed the literature, focusing on the past 10 years. The highly selected Milan criteria of LT for HCC (single nodule < 5 cm or up to 3 nodules < 3 cm) have been recently extended by a group from the University of S. Francisco (1 lesion < 6.5 cm or up to 3 lesions < 4.5 cm) with satisfying results in terms of recurrence-free survival and the "up-to-seven criteria". Moreover, using these criteria, other transplant groups have recently developed downstaging protocols, including surgical or loco-regional treatments of HCC, which have increased the post-operative survival of recipients. CCA may be treated by LT in patients who cannot undergo liver resection because of underlying liver disease or for anatomical technical challenges. A well-defined protocol of chemoirradiation and staging laparotomy before LT has been developed by the Mayo Clinic, which has resulted in long term disease-free survival comparable to other indications. LT for LM has also been investigated by multicenter studies. It offers a real benefit for metastases from neuroendocrine tumors that are well differentiated and when a major extrahepatic resection is not required. If LT is an option in these selected cases, liver metastases from colorectal cancer is still a borderline indication because data concerning the disease-free survival are still lacking. Hepatoblastoma and hemangioendothelioma represent rare primary tumors for which LT is often the only possible and effective cure because of the frequent multifocal, intrahepatic nature of the disease. LT is a very promising procedure for both primary and secondary liver malignancies; however, it needs an accurate evaluation of the costs and benefits for each indication to balance the chances of cure with actual organ availability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cholangiocarcinoma; Hemangioendothelioma; Hepatoblastoma; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Liver cancer; Liver metastases; Liver transplantation; Neuroendocrine carcinoma

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24833864      PMCID: PMC4017049          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  60 in total

1.  ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the management of patients with liver and other distant metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms of foregut, midgut, hindgut, and unknown primary.

Authors:  Marianne Pavel; Eric Baudin; Anne Couvelard; Eric Krenning; Kjell Öberg; Thomas Steinmüller; Martin Anlauf; Bertram Wiedenmann; Ramon Salazar
Journal:  Neuroendocrinology       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.914

2.  Neuroendocrine tumors metastatic to the liver: how to select patients for liver transplantation?

Authors:  Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Andrea Pulvirenti; Jorgelina Coppa
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 3.  Primary malignant hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: a comprehensive review of the literature with emphasis on the surgical therapy.

Authors:  Arianeb Mehrabi; Arash Kashfi; Hamidreza Fonouni; Peter Schemmer; Bruno M Schmied; Peter Hallscheidt; Peter Schirmacher; Jurgen Weitz; Helmut Friess; Markus W Buchler; Jan Schmidt
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Liver transplantation for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Gregory J Gores; Sarwa Darwish Murad; Julie K Heimbach; Charles B Rosen
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 2.404

Review 5.  Hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Alejandro Forner; Josep M Llovet; Jordi Bruix
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification.

Authors:  J M Llovet; C Brú; J Bruix
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 6.115

7.  Liver transplantation criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma should be expanded: a 22-year experience with 467 patients at UCLA.

Authors:  John P Duffy; Andrew Vardanian; Elizabeth Benjamin; Melissa Watson; Douglas G Farmer; Rafik M Ghobrial; Gerald Lipshutz; Hasan Yersiz; David S K Lu; Charles Lassman; Myron J Tong; Jonathan R Hiatt; Ronald W Busuttil
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Liver allocation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a European Center policy in the pre-MELD era.

Authors:  Matteo Ravaioli; Gian Luca Grazi; Giorgio Ercolani; Matteo Cescon; Massimo Del Gaudio; Matteo Zanello; Giorgio Ballardini; Giovanni Varotti; Gaetano Vetrone; Francesco Tuci; Augusto Lauro; Giovanni Ramacciato; Antonio Daniele Pinna
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2006-02-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 9.  Allocation policy for hepatocellular carcinoma in the MELD era: room for improvement?

Authors:  Kayvan Roayaie; Sandy Feng
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.799

10.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: the MELD impact.

Authors:  Pratima Sharma; Vijayan Balan; Jose L Hernandez; Ann M Harper; Erick B Edwards; Hector Rodriguez-Luna; Thomas Byrne; Hugo E Vargas; David Mulligan; Jorge Rakela; Russell H Wiesner
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.799

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Klatskin tumor: long-term survival following surgery].

Authors:  B Juntermanns; C D Fingas; G C Sotiropoulos; D Jaradat; A Dechêne; H Reis; S Kasper; A Paul; G M Kaiser
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Radiofrequency ablation for single hepatocellular carcinoma 3 cm or less as first-line treatment.

Authors:  Jun Gao; Shao-Hong Wang; Xue-Mei Ding; Wen-Bing Sun; Xiao-Long Li; Zong-Hai Xin; Chun-Min Ning; Shi-Gang Guo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Current status of surgical treatment of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Feng Xu; Bin Tang; Tian-Qiang Jin; Chao-Liu Dai
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 1.337

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.