Literature DB >> 24833142

Comparison between transverse mini-incision and longitudinal mini-incision for the resection of locally advanced colonic cancer.

Hideyuki Ishida1, Jun Sobajima, Masaru Yokoyama, Hiroshi Nakada, Norimichi Okada, Kensuke Kumamoto, Keiichiro Ishibashi.   

Abstract

We performed a retrospective review of non-overweight (body mass index ≤ 25 kg/m(2)) patients scheduled to undergo a curative resection of locally advanced colon cancer via a transverse mini-incision (n = 62) or a longitudinal mini-incision (skin incision ≤7 cm, n = 62), with the latter group of patients randomly selected as historical controls matched with the former group according to tumor location. Extension of the transverse mini-incision wound was necessary in 3 patients (5%). Both groups were largely equivalent in terms of demographic, clinicopathological, and surgical factors and frequency of postoperative complications. Postoperative analgesic was significantly less (P = 0.04) and postoperative length of the hospital stay was significantly shorter (P < 0.01) in the transverse mini-incision group. Concerning a mini-incision approach for locally advanced colonic cancer, a transverse incision seems to be advantageous with regard to minimal invasiveness and early recovery compared with a longitudinal incision.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colectomy; Colonic cancer; Mini-laparotomy; Transverse incision

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24833142      PMCID: PMC4027903          DOI: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-13-00268.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Surg        ISSN: 0020-8868


  24 in total

1.  [Transverse minilaparotomy as an access route in right colon disease: a valid alternative to midline laparotomy].

Authors:  F Stipa; M Barreca; G Lucandri; E Fernades; P Mercantini; L Meli; V Ziparo
Journal:  Chir Ital       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb

2.  A quantitative relationship of wound tensile strength to length.

Authors:  G NISHIHARA; J F PRUDDEN
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1958-09

Review 3.  Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection.

Authors:  K C H Fearon; O Ljungqvist; M Von Meyenfeldt; A Revhaug; C H C Dejong; K Lassen; J Nygren; J Hausel; M Soop; J Andersen; H Kehlet
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 7.324

4.  Impact of prior abdominal surgery on curative resection of colon cancer via minilaparotomy.

Authors:  Hideyuki Ishida; Tohru Ishiguro; Keiichiro Ishibashi; Tomonori Ohsawa; Kouki Kuwabara; Norimichi Okada; Tatsuya Miyazaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Colectomy for colon cancer via a 7-cm minilaparotomy.

Authors:  T Nakagoe; T Sawai; T Tsuji; M Jibiki; A Nanashima; H Yamaguchi; T Yasutake; H Ayabe
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Use of minilaparotomy in the treatment of colonic cancer.

Authors:  T Nakagoe; T Sawai; T Tsuji; H Ayabe
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 7.  Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review.

Authors:  George J Chang; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; John M Skibber; Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  The relative rate of wound healing in longitudinal and transverse laparotomy incisions. Animal experiments.

Authors:  T Nilsson
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1982

9.  A randomised controlled trial of transverse skin crease vs. vertical midline incision for right hemicolectomy.

Authors:  S R Brown; P J Goodfellow; I J Adam; A J Shorthouse
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Minilaparotomy left iliac fossa skin crease incision vs. midline incision for left-sided colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M H Kam; F Seow-Choen; X H Peng; K W Eu; C L Tang; S M Heah; B S Ooi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.