UNLABELLED: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) exposure leads to persistent life-long infections characterized by chronic inflammation often developing into cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The mechanism by which HCV remains in the liver while inducing an inflammatory and antiviral response remains unclear. Though the innate immune response to HCV in patients seems to be quite active, HCV has been shown in cell culture to employ a diverse array of innate immune antagonists, which suggests that current model systems to study interactions between HCV and the innate immune system are not representative of what happens in vivo. We recently showed that hepatoma-derived HepG2 cells support the entire HCV life cycle if the liver-specific microRNA, miR-122, is expressed along with the entry factor, CD81 (termed HepG2-HFL cells). We found that there was a striking difference in these cells' ability to sustain HCV infection and spread when compared with Huh-7 and Huh-7.5 cells. Additionally, HepG2-HFL cells exhibited a more robust antiviral response when challenged with other RNA viruses and viral mimetics than Huh-7 and Huh-7.5 cells. HCV infection elicited a potent interferon-lambda (IFN-λ), IFN-stimulated gene, and cytokine response in HepG2-HFL cells, but not in Huh-7 cells, suggesting that HepG2-HFL cells more faithfully recapitulate the innate immune response to HCV infection in vivo. Using this model, we found that blocking the retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I)-like receptor pathway or the IFN-λ-signaling pathway promoted HCV infection and spread in HepG2-HFL cells. CONCLUSION: HepG2-HFL cells represent a new system to study the interaction between HCV and the innate immune system, solidifying the importance of IFN-λ in hepatic response to HCV infection and revealing non-redundant roles of RIG-I and melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 in HCV recognition and repression of infection.
UNLABELLED: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) exposure leads to persistent life-long infections characterized by chronic inflammation often developing into cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The mechanism by which HCV remains in the liver while inducing an inflammatory and antiviral response remains unclear. Though the innate immune response to HCV in patients seems to be quite active, HCV has been shown in cell culture to employ a diverse array of innate immune antagonists, which suggests that current model systems to study interactions between HCV and the innate immune system are not representative of what happens in vivo. We recently showed that hepatoma-derived HepG2 cells support the entire HCV life cycle if the liver-specific microRNA, miR-122, is expressed along with the entry factor, CD81 (termed HepG2-HFL cells). We found that there was a striking difference in these cells' ability to sustain HCV infection and spread when compared with Huh-7 and Huh-7.5 cells. Additionally, HepG2-HFL cells exhibited a more robust antiviral response when challenged with other RNA viruses and viral mimetics than Huh-7 and Huh-7.5 cells. HCV infection elicited a potent interferon-lambda (IFN-λ), IFN-stimulated gene, and cytokine response in HepG2-HFL cells, but not in Huh-7 cells, suggesting that HepG2-HFL cells more faithfully recapitulate the innate immune response to HCV infection in vivo. Using this model, we found that blocking the retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I)-like receptor pathway or the IFN-λ-signaling pathway promoted HCV infection and spread in HepG2-HFL cells. CONCLUSION:HepG2-HFL cells represent a new system to study the interaction between HCV and the innate immune system, solidifying the importance of IFN-λ in hepatic response to HCV infection and revealing non-redundant roles of RIG-I and melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 in HCV recognition and repression of infection.
Authors: A Sirven; E Ravet; P Charneau; V Zennou; L Coulombel; D Guétard; F Pflumio; A Dubart-Kupperschmitt Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: C F Basler; X Wang; E Mühlberger; V Volchkov; J Paragas; H D Klenk; A García-Sastre; P Palese Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2000-10-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Kui Li; Eileen Foy; Josephine C Ferreon; Mitsuyasu Nakamura; Allan C M Ferreon; Masanori Ikeda; Stuart C Ray; Michael Gale; Stanley M Lemon Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-02-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Steven S Carroll; Joanne E Tomassini; Michele Bosserman; Krista Getty; Mark W Stahlhut; Anne B Eldrup; Balkrishen Bhat; Dawn Hall; Amy L Simcoe; Robert LaFemina; Carrie A Rutkowski; Bohdan Wolanski; Zhucheng Yang; Giovanni Migliaccio; Raffaele De Francesco; Lawrence C Kuo; Malcolm MacCoss; David B Olsen Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2003-01-27 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Dandan Liu; Tanyaradzwa P Ndongwe; Maritza Puray-Chavez; Mary C Casey; Taisuke Izumi; Vinay K Pathak; Philip R Tedbury; Stefan G Sarafianos Journal: FASEB J Date: 2020-06-04 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Boris V Krivoshiev; Gerrit T S Beemster; Katrien Sprangers; Bart Cuypers; Kris Laukens; Ronny Blust; Steven J Husson Journal: Toxicol Res (Camb) Date: 2018-03-12 Impact factor: 3.524
Authors: Franziska S Hoffmann; Andreas Schmidt; Meike Dittmann Chevillotte; Christian Wisskirchen; Johannes Hellmuth; Simone Willms; Rachel H Gilmore; Jürgen Glas; Matthias Folwaczny; Tobias Müller; Thomas Berg; Ulrich Spengler; Karen Fitzmaurice; Dermot Kelleher; Nicole Reisch; Charles M Rice; Stefan Endres; Simon Rothenfusser Journal: Hepatology Date: 2015-01-05 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Sara Cuadrado-Castano; Juan Ayllon; Mena Mansour; Janis de la Iglesia-Vicente; Stefan Jordan; Shashank Tripathi; Adolfo García-Sastre; Enrique Villar Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 6.261