Literature DB >> 24832980

Effects of concurrent strength and endurance training on genes related to myostatin signaling pathway and muscle fiber responses.

Eduardo O de Souza1, Valmor Tricoli, Marcelo S Aoki, Hamilton Roschel, Patrícia C Brum, Aline V N Bacurau, Carla Silva-Batista, Jacob M Wilson, Manoel Neves, Antonio G Soares, Carlos Ugrinowitsch.   

Abstract

Concurrent training (CT) seems to impair training-induced muscle hypertrophy. This study compared the effects of CT, strength training (ST) and interval training (IT) on the muscle fiber cross-sectional area (CSA) response, and on the expression of selected genes involved in the myostatin (MSTN) signaling mRNA levels. Thirty-seven physically active men were randomly divided into 4 groups: CT (n = 11), ST (n = 11), IT (n = 8), and control group (C) (n = 7) and underwent an 8-week training period. Vastus lateralis biopsy muscle samples were obtained at baseline and 48 hours after the last training session. Muscle fiber CSA, selected genes expression, and maximum dynamic ST (1 repetition maximum) were evaluated before and after training. Type IIa and type I muscle fiber CSA increased from pre- to posttest only in the ST group (17.08 and 17.9%, respectively). The SMAD-7 gene expression significantly increased at the posttest in the ST (53.9%) and CT groups (39.3%). The MSTN and its regulatory genes ActIIb, FLST-3, FOXO-3a, and GASP-1 mRNA levels remained unchanged across time and groups. One repetition maximum increased from pre- to posttest in both the ST and CT groups (ST = 18.5%; CT = 17.6%). Our findings are suggestive that MSTN and their regulatory genes at transcript level cannot differentiate muscle fiber CSA responses between CT and ST regimens in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24832980     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  6 in total

1.  Interference Phenomenon with Concurrent Strength and High-Intensity Interval Training-Based Aerobic Training: An Updated Model.

Authors:  Felipe C Vechin; Miguel S Conceição; Guilherme D Telles; Cleiton A Libardi; Carlos Ugrinowitsch
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Does Aerobic Training Promote the Same Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy as Resistance Training? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jozo Grgic; Luke C Mcllvenna; Jackson J Fyfe; Filip Sabol; David J Bishop; Brad J Schoenfeld; Zeljko Pedisic
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Fructose Consumption in the Development of Obesity and the Effects of Different Protocols of Physical Exercise on the Hepatic Metabolism.

Authors:  Rodrigo Martins Pereira; José Diego Botezelli; Kellen Cristina da Cruz Rodrigues; Rania A Mekary; Dennys Esper Cintra; José Rodrigo Pauli; Adelino Sanchez Ramos da Silva; Eduardo Rochete Ropelle; Leandro Pereira de Moura
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  The Effects of Concurrent Aerobic and Strength Training on Muscle Fiber Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tommy R Lundberg; Joshua F Feuerbacher; Marvin Sünkeler; Moritz Schumann
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 11.928

5.  Biomechanical implications of skeletal muscle hypertrophy and atrophy: a musculoskeletal model.

Authors:  Andrew D Vigotsky; Bret Contreras; Chris Beardsley
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Effect of eccentric action velocity on expression of genes related to myostatin signaling pathway in human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Hamilton Roschel; Carlos Ugrinowistch; Audrei Reis Santos; Wesley Pereira Barbosa; Elen Haruka Miyabara; Valmor Tricoli; Marcelo Saldanha Aoki
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 2.806

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.