Literature DB >> 24832858

Repair of complete urethral disruption due to synthetic sling complication.

Nitya Abraham1, Adrienne Quirouet, Sandip Vasavada.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Urethral complications due to synthetic midurethral slings are rare. Possible causes may include unrecognized trocar injury, mesh implantation despite recognized injury, mesh contamination leading to inflammation and delayed perforation, and excessive sling tension. There is no consensus as to the surgical management of urethral complications with regard to how much mesh should be excised, whether an interposition flap should be used, and whether a pubovaginal sling should be placed at the time of surgery. The purpose of this video is to present a technique of repairing complete urethral disruption due to a synthetic midurethral sling complication.
METHODS: In this video, we demonstrate the steps to perform primary end-to-end urethral reconstruction for repairing complete urethral disruption. Any residual synthetic mesh must first be excised, after which the anastomosis may be completed.
RESULTS: Complete urethral disruption is a rare complication of synthetic midurethral sling surgery that can be repaired primarily with good results.
CONCLUSIONS: There is no consensus regarding surgical management of urethral complications caused by synthetic midurethral slings, and thus an individualized approach should be used based on patient presentation and surgeon expertise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24832858     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2416-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  3 in total

1.  Surgical management of lower urinary mesh perforation after mid-urethral polypropylene mesh sling: mesh excision, urinary tract reconstruction and concomitant pubovaginal sling with autologous rectus fascia.

Authors:  Ketul Shah; Dmitriy Nikolavsky; Daniel Gilsdorf; Brian J Flynn
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Adverse events over two years after retropubic or transobturator midurethral sling surgery: findings from the Trial of Midurethral Slings (TOMUS) study.

Authors:  Linda Brubaker; Peggy A Norton; Michael E Albo; Toby C Chai; Kimberly J Dandreo; Keith L Lloyd; Jerry L Lowder; Larry T Sirls; Gary E Lemack; Amy M Arisco; Yan Xu; John W Kusek
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Urethral erosion after synthetic and nonsynthetic pubovaginal slings: differences in management and continence outcome.

Authors:  Cindy L Amundsen; Brian J Flynn; George D Webster
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.450

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.