Literature DB >> 24832833

Transferability of results of cost utility analyses for biologicals in inflammatory conditions for Central and Eastern European countries.

László Gulácsi1, Fanni Rencz, Márta Péntek, Valentin Brodszky, Ruth Lopert, Noémi V Hevér, Petra Baji.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries require cost-utility analyses (CUAs) to support reimbursement formulary listing. However, CUAs informed by local evidence are often unavailable, and the cost-effectiveness of the several currently reimbursed biologicals is unclear. AIM: To estimate the cost-effectiveness as multiples of per capita GDP/quality adjusted life years (QALY) of four biologicals (infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab) currently reimbursed in six CEE countries in six inflammatory rheumatoid and bowel disease conditions.
METHODS: Systematic literature review of published cost-utility analyses in the selected conditions, using the United Kingdom (UK) as reference country and with study selection criteria set to optimize the transfer of results to the CEEs. Prices in each CEE country were pro-rated against UK prices using purchasing power parity (PPP)-adjusted per capita GDP, and local GDP per capita/QALY ratios estimated.
RESULTS: Central and Eastern European countries list prices were 144-333% higher than pro rata prices. Out of 85 CUAs identified by previous systematic literature reviews, 15 were selected as a convenience sample for estimating the cost-effectiveness of biologicals in the CEE countries in terms of per capita GDP/QALY. Per capita GDP/QALY values varied from 0.42 to 6.4 across countries and conditions (Bulgaria: 0.97-6.38; Czech Republic: 0.42-2.76; Hungary: 0.54-3.54; Poland: 0.59-3.90; Romania: 0.77-5.07; Slovakia: 0.55-3.61).
CONCLUSION: While results must be interpreted with caution, calculating pro rata (cost-effective) prices and per capita GDP/QALY ratios based on CUAs can aid reimbursement decision-making in the absence of analyses using local data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24832833     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-014-0591-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  26 in total

1.  Differential pricing of drugs: a role for cost-effectiveness analysis?

Authors:  Ruth Lopert; Danielle L Lang; Suzanne R Hill; David A Henry
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Golimumab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a NICE single technology appraisal.

Authors:  Huiqin Yang; Dawn Craig; David Epstein; Laura Bojke; Kate Light; Ian N Bruce; Mark Sculpher; Nerys Woolacott
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Financial deficits in the health services of the UK and Hungary.

Authors:  Imre Boncz; Andor Sebestyén
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-09-09       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Applying rapid 'de-facto' HTA in resource-limited settings: experience from Romania.

Authors:  Ruth Lopert; Francis Ruiz; Kalipso Chalkidou
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Health technology assessment in Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria.

Authors:  László Gulácsi; Alexandru M Rotar; Maciej Niewada; Olga Löblová; Fanni Rencz; Guenka Petrova; Imre Boncz; Niek S Klazinga
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-05-16

Review 6.  A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in adults and an economic evaluation of their cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Y-F Chen; P Jobanputra; P Barton; S Jowett; S Bryan; W Clark; A Fry-Smith; A Burls
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  Disease burden of psoriatic arthritis compared to rheumatoid arthritis, Hungarian experiment.

Authors:  Valentin Brodszky; Péter Bálint; Pál Géher; László Hodinka; Gábor Horváth; Éva Koó; Márta Péntek; Anna Polgár; Magdolna Seszták; Sándor Szántó; Ilona Ujfalussy; László Gulácsi
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.631

8.  Health-economic analysis: cost-effectiveness of scheduled maintenance treatment with infliximab for Crohn's disease--modelling outcomes in active luminal and fistulizing disease in adults.

Authors:  J Lindsay; Y S Punekar; J Morris; G Chung-Faye
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 8.171

9.  Cost-effectiveness of adalimumab for the maintenance of remission in patients with Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Edward V Loftus; Scott J Johnson; Andrew P Yu; Eric Q Wu; Jingdong Chao; Parvez M Mulani
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.566

10.  Cost effectiveness of adalimumab for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  M F Botteman; J W Hay; M P Luo; A S Curry; R L Wong; B A van Hout
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2007-06-02       Impact factor: 7.580

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Biological therapy in inflammatory bowel diseases: access in Central and Eastern Europe.

Authors:  Fanni Rencz; Márta Péntek; Martin Bortlik; Edyta Zagorowicz; Tibor Hlavaty; Andrzej Śliwczyński; Mihai M Diculescu; Limas Kupcinskas; Krisztina B Gecse; László Gulácsi; Peter L Lakatos
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  EQ-5D in Central and Eastern Europe: 2000-2015.

Authors:  Fanni Rencz; László Gulácsi; Michael Drummond; Dominik Golicki; Valentina Prevolnik Rupel; Judit Simon; Elly A Stolk; Valentin Brodszky; Petra Baji; Jakub Závada; Guenka Petrova; Alexandru Rotar; Márta Péntek
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Disease-Related Costs Published in The Middle East and North Africa Region: Systematic Review and Analysis of Transferability.

Authors:  Zsombor Zrubka; Márta Péntek; Lea Mhanna; Teebah Abu-Zahra; Mohamed Mahdi-Abid; Meriem Fgaier; Faris El-Dahiyat; Hana Al-Abdulkarim; Michael Drummond; László Gulácsi
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.558

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.